Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

I love the ladies, long time.

Actually thinking of ending my serial monogamous relationships and settling down in the next couple years.

Hope you find the right woman....you say you stay away from white Americans, I did and do too...but I stay away from all American women, lol.

I have yellow fever I guess, lol.
 
Hope you find the right woman....you say you stay away from white Americans, I did and do too...but I stay away from all American women, lol.

I have yellow fever I guess, lol.
the American women stationed at subic bay had a hard time getting a date, lol....American women have been hillaried, lol

when a sailor would bring a philipina back to the states philipinas would gather around her and tell her you are not in PI anymore, we don't act like that here---that is honest truth!!! American women have horrible attitudes, fortunately my wife agrees with me!!!
 
Hope you find the right woman....you say you stay away from white Americans, I did and do too...but I stay away from all American women, lol.

I have yellow fever I guess, lol.

Thanks.
And same. I once lived with a Taiwanese woman, which was why I asked you about Taiwan a while back :)
 
the American women stationed at subic bay had a hard time getting a date, lol....American women have been hillaried, lol

when a sailor would bring a philipina back to the states philipinas would gather around her and tell her you are not in PI anymore, we don't act like that here---that is honest truth!!! American women have horrible attitudes, fortunately my wife agrees with me!!!

Been Hillaried!!! Lol

I'm going to take credit for having an exceptionally cool white girl wife. A quite Liberal Christian.

Unlike first wife

Bad white girl attitude on that one.
 
Watching this town hall debate, cant believe anyone even takes this platform seriously.

If you wanna keep your guns, you an keep your guns....hahahahahahahaa

just like his lies on health care, ending the wars, lobby money, his oath to the constitution, global warming, promising transparency, respecting journalists, ending warrentless wiretapping and so on.

This dirty lying cockroach cannot be trusted on anything he says.
 
Watching this town hall debate, cant believe anyone even takes this platform seriously.

If you wanna keep your guns, you an keep your guns....hahahahahahahaa

just like his lies on health care, ending the wars, lobby money, his oath to the constitution, global warming, promising transparency, respecting journalists, ending warrentless wiretapping and so on.

This dirty lying cockroach cannot be trusted on anything he says.

I can't believe he lied but let's vote for another president, he is telling the truth ;)
 
I can't believe he lied but let's vote for another president, he is telling the truth ;)

Here I sit saying "no ones going to take your guns from you" while I foaming at the mouth knowing I cant get the guns I want in the first place.
 
Science denial is the most laughable right wing phenomenon. Go ahead, post your link to a study or article. They pale in comparison to the evidence.

There is even heavier science denial on the left and they want to persecute scientists and even NASA or anyone that questions why the climate changes or references how the sun may effect change, etc....That is not science.

Then its already leaked out during the Copenhagen conference that the climate hasnt warmed in over 18 years and governments wanted to hide this from the public as it would put a heavy strain on pushing the corporate agenda and tax ponzi schemes they want to unleash on the world.

Its easy to prove the climate changes, that has happened since the birth of the planet.

There are trillions of dollars at stake here.
 
There is even heavier science denial on the left and they want to persecute scientists and even NASA or anyone that questions why the climate changes or references how the sun may effect change, etc....That is not science.

Then its already leaked out during the Copenhagen conference that the climate hasnt warmed in over 18 years and governments wanted to hide this from the public as it would put a heavy strain on pushing the corporate agenda and tax ponzi schemes they want to unleash on the world.

Its easy to prove the climate changes, that has happened since the birth of the planet.

There are trillions of dollars at stake here.

No.
 
Science denial is the most laughable right wing phenomenon. Go ahead, post your link to a study or article. They pale in comparison to the evidence.

yes, I agree...but Obama attending a coast guard graduation and telling them that denial of global warming is dereliction of duty is going too far, imo....

hey dma, google..... what does the military think of Obama's stance on isis
 
yes, I agree...but Obama attending a coast guard graduation and telling them that denial of global warming is dereliction of duty is going too far, imo....

hey dma, google..... what does the military think of Obama's stance on isis
I will.

But science unfortunately has been politicized. But real science has no agenda. Politicians have agendas and manipulate many things for their own. But science has none.
 
I will.

But science unfortunately has been politicized. But real science has no agenda. Politicians have agendas and manipulate many things for their own. But science has none.

But there are "real" scientists that disagree, so your only picking what science you want to believe in.
 
I will.

But science unfortunately has been politicized. But real science has no agenda. Politicians have agendas and manipulate many things for their own. But science has none.

I agree weird stuff going on with the weather....but I also believe governments particularly ours is trying to manipulate weather.
 

I gotta go to bet but ill grab and post this real quick.

March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science

CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center

Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change.

/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years

/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years

/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years

/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years

/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years

/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years

/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years

/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years

/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years

/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years

/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years

/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years

/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years

/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years

/s/ Anita Gale

/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years

/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years

/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years

/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years

/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years

/s/ Thomas J. Harmon

/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years

/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years

/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years

/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years

/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years

/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years

/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years

/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years

/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen

/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years

/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years

/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years

/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years

/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years

/s/ Tom Ohesorge

/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years

/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years

/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years

/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years

/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years

/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years

/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years

/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years

/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years

/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years

/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years

/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years

/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years
 
Not that vast, no way. Where you got those numbers from, CNN?

And no, I don't watch cable news channels. They're all a joke. I get my news from Facebook, the Daily Show, and Bill Maher.

Not srs.

But srs about the news channels
 
The 90+% is in regards to evolution.

Oh, I understand. Thats a whole nother issue though but I see your point, I just believe mainstream media makes it appear worse than it is, and then they wont cover real stats such as the climate NOT warming the past 18 years and how government kept this hidden from the public to promote their corporate agendas.
 
And no, I don't watch cable news channels. They're all a joke. I get my news from Facebook, the Daily Show, and Bill Maher.

Not srs.

But srs about the news channels

Lol Bill Maher!
 
Yup....science can control the climate, create storms, earthquakes, steer hurricanes, make rain disappear, etc....

Eating hamburgers wont make the ice caps melt.

you can wipe out an entire city with earhquakes/sunami's...not to mention the damage that could be done with drought.

I bet the military is creamin in their jeans about the possibilities of using weather as a weapon
 
I love Bill Maher, but obviously not where I get my news. He's my kind of non-PC Lib

I used to love him, he helped me get through the Bush years but he lost me after Obama took power. He can still make me laugh though.
 
you can wipe out an entire city with earhquakes/sunami's...not to mention the damage that could be done with drought.

I bet the military is creamin in their jeans about the possibilities of using weather as a weapon

They already started using them during the Vietnam war to create massive rainstorms to create mudslides and stuff.
 
I used to love him, he helped me get through the Bush years but he lost me after Obama took power. He can still make me laugh though.

if I want a laugh I just listen to George carlin[RIP]do snow white and the 7 dwarfs, now that is funny!!!
 
Invalid Link Removed

This is near my hometown, happened a month ago. It was so hot for december, yet it broke a record set 118 years prior. We weren't driving suvs 100 years ago.

And before you say it, all the alarmists but to weather events to "prove" global warming is true. Yes weather is different than climate.
 
Invalid Link Removed

There have been 5 major ice ages. What did humans do to cause the global warming that melted all that ice?
 
This presentation contains photos and quotes This presentation contains photos and quotes of over 200 scientists. This list starts with 45 IPCC scientists, 35 Australian scientists, then NASA and other leading scientists then it concludes with 26 Meteorologists.
“We‟re not scientifically there yet. Despite
what you may have heard in the media, there
is nothing like a consensus of scientific
opinion that this is a problem. Because there
is natural variability in the weather, you
cannot statistically know for another 150
years.”

Invalid Link Removed

A_major_deception_on__global_warming__Wall_Street_Journal_Professor_Frederick_Seitz_19960612.pdf
Invalid Link Removed

David_Evans_climate-coup-politics.pdf
Invalid Link Removed

Climate change assessments Review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC
Invalid Link Removed

Global Warming Prediction Index
Invalid Link Removed
 
Anyone remember the "Save The Rainforest" movement back in the 80's? Lol, when I was a kid I thought we were coming close to the Apocalypse!

Then we also had Maurice Strong who just passed away, scandalous caught with the food for oil scheme where he has been hiding in Beijing to avoid arrest coaching the Chinese on how to cash in on the climate change scam made the 70's-80's push all about global cooling and handing over the power of humanity to the United Nations elite to take care of it. Learn from history people, trillions of dollars and far bigger power grabs are at stake here.

Here is Time Magazine in '74 ROFLLLL!!!

Invalid Link Removed
 
Invalid Link Removed

There have been 5 major ice ages. What did humans do to cause the global warming that melted all that ice?

Oh no, you didnt just post that! This is a call to ban your 2nd Amendment rights by bypassing the 5th Amendment. Good luck with your background checks in the future and criticizing the government approved science will be classified as a "psychological illness." Thanks Obama!
 
Invalid Link Removed

This deserves 1st party posting so Obama can see it!

Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate

James Taylor ,
Nov 23, 2011 @ 11:38 AM 1,684 views
Forbes Magazine


A new batch of 5,000 emails among scientists central to the assertion that humans are causing a global warming crisis were anonymously released to the public yesterday, igniting a new firestorm of controversy nearly two years to the day after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal.

Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails:

(1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions;

(2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and

(3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data.

Regarding scientific transparency, a defining characteristic of science is the open sharing of scientific data, theories and procedures so that independent parties, and especially skeptics of a particular theory or hypothesis, can replicate and validate asserted experiments or observations.

Emails between Climategate scientists, however, show a concerted effort to hide rather than disseminate underlying evidence and procedures.

“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,”writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a newly released email.

“Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”

The original Climategate emails contained similar evidence of destroying information and data that the public would naturally assume would be available according to freedom of information principles. “Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith [Briffa] re AR4 [UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment]?” Jones wrote to Penn State University scientist Michael Mann in an email released in Climategate 1.0. “Keith will do likewise. … We will be getting Caspar [Ammann] to do likewise. I see that CA [the Climate Audit Web site] claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!”

The new emails also reveal the scientists’ attempts to politicize the debate and advance predetermined outcomes.

“The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out” of IPCC reports, writes Jonathan Overpeck, coordinating lead author for the IPCC’s most recent climate assessment.

“I gave up on [Georgia Institute of Technology climate professor] Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she thinks she’s doing, but its not helping the cause,” wrote Mann in another newly released email.
 
For every link you post, I can match it. Your studies are bought. Any study from a politically backed site, news outlet, etc. is bought. On both sides. I am an independent science advocate. And your one-sided right leaning science denial means nothing to me. Zero.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Back
Top