Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

Aleksandar37 said:
Most recently, interfering in this last election. I'm not a huge fan of Bernie, but she should have let the votes speak and not pulled her behind-the-scenes crap. Beyond that I don't like her role in the wars under Obama and even her influence in the Bosnian and Kosovo action under her husband, so pick any of those.
Click to expand...

lets add in Libya...at least it's a starting point.
 
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

So an FBI agent is removed for his anti Trump and pro clinton bias. Turns out he's the one that intetviewed Huma and Cheryl Mills about the Clinton email scandal. Those two lied to the FBI and weren't prosecuted, and they get Flynn on a lying to the FBI charge.

Nothing to see here, right?
 
The Net Neutrality Scam goes deeper:

The New York Attorney general is calling out the FCC (Ajit) for not investigating thousands of fake comments, which support the repeal of net neutrality, before going to vote on December 14th. All of the comments were submitted via an API (many redditors have demonstrated evidence that the FCC orchestrated the 'hack', as the FCC has made no record of a security breach in which the comments were allegedly submitted. All government agencies must have reports of any and all breaches made to their network. On top of that, the API can only be authorized by someone within the FCC. Ajit has some 'splaining to do.

Ajit is stating that the majority of the public want the FCC to relinquish net neutrality given the overwhelming number of submissions, despite the majority of legitimate submissions being against repealing it. No doubt the court hearings being thrown against the FCC will be shunted until after the repeal happens, and after Ajit gets his payout.

Tl;DR Ajit Pai is as corrupt as you can get. Thankfully the internet is waking up.

The sad part about of all this? Despite all of the public submissions, Ajit is ignoring them all. If this doesn't scare you that you are not living in a true democracy; nothing will.

help get this video viral: Invalid Link Removed
 
Jiigzz said:
The Net Neutrality Scam goes deeper:

The New York Attorney general is calling out the FCC (Ajit) for not investigating thousands of fake comments, which support the repeal of net neutrality, before going to vote on December 14th. All of the comments were submitted via an API (many redditors have demonstrated evidence that the FCC orchestrated the 'hack', as the FCC has made no record of a security breach in which the comments were allegedly submitted. All government agencies must have reports of any and all breaches made to their network. On top of that, the API can only be authorized by someone within the FCC. Ajit has some 'splaining to do.

Ajit is stating that the majority of the public want the FCC to relinquish net neutrality given the overwhelming number of submissions, despite the majority of legitimate submissions being against repealing it. No doubt the court hearings being thrown against the FCC will be shunted until after the repeal happens, and after Ajit gets his payout.

Tl;DR Ajit Pai is as corrupt as you can get. Thankfully the internet is waking up.

The sad part about of all this? Despite all of the public submissions, Ajit is ignoring them all. If this doesn't scare you that you are not living in a true democracy; nothing will.

help get this video viral: Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

You realize "net neutrality" was implemented just a few years ago by Obama. Prior to that there was no one crying about needing the US government to stick their nose in and start regulating the internet. So how is going back to the regulations that governed the Internet for a couple decades going to lead to death and destruction of it?
 
youngandfree said:
You realize "net neutrality" was implemented just a few years ago by Obama. Prior to that there was no one crying about needing the US government to stick their nose in and start regulating the internet. So how is going back to the regulations that governed the Internet for a couple decades going to lead to death and destruction of it?
Click to expand...

Edit: wait wrong source

Ok here we go.

The battle for net neutrality has been since internet use became widespread in homes. The timeline is below, but essentially it was always known, or at least expected that the FCC would treat the internet as a utility.

Invalid Link Removed

The FCC battled with Verizon and Comcast during 2007-2014, but it later emerged that they had no grounds to do so, so they drafted up a plan so that it could. The plan prohibited discriminating access and essentially removed power from Verizon and Comcast now that they know they can throttle and charge more for access.

With this repeal, expect them to do so.

Comcast and Verizon have already throttled websites prior to, and during net neutrality when they shouldn't have. They have done it before, but we expect they will do so even more now. There is a lot more money at stake, and huge gains to make.

The internet should be treated as a utility. It is essentially the lifeblood of many peoples careers and livelihoods. Only in the US would they challenge that
 
Additionally, there were 4 internet freedoms set in 2003, and when Comcast tried to go against those, the FCC challenged them.

Comcast fought back and in 2010, the Judges sided with Comcast, fueling more power to them given legal precedent. The battle for net neutrality was in full force: Invalid Link Removed

In 2014 the precedent had been set that companies like Verizon and Comcast could actually abuse internet freedoms, and so the FCC enforced title II for the internet, and passed the necessary legislation to make it happen.

With the repeal in place, Comcast and Verizon will most definitely use the power to draw out more money from websites and internet users in the US. They have already done so, and you can expect it to get worse.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

So an FBI agent is removed for his anti Trump and pro clinton bias. Turns out he's the one that intetviewed Huma and Cheryl Mills about the Clinton email scandal. Those two lied to the FBI and weren't prosecuted, and they get Flynn on a lying to the FBI charge.

Nothing to see here, right?
Click to expand...

isn't he also the one who interviewed Flynn? I know he is the one involved with the 'dossier'.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

So an FBI agent is removed for his anti Trump and pro clinton bias. Turns out he's the one that intetviewed Huma and Cheryl Mills about the Clinton email scandal. Those two lied to the FBI and weren't prosecuted, and they get Flynn on a lying to the FBI charge.

Nothing to see here, right?
Click to expand...

This isn't a trick question. I'm honestly curious to understand where you're coming from on this. My understanding is that Mueller found out a member of the team was biased against Trump and removed that person. Isn't that a good thing and showing that the leadership of the team is not biased?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
This isn't a trick question. I'm honestly curious to understand where you're coming from on this. My understanding is that Mueller found out a member of the team was biased against Trump and removed that person. Isn't that a good thing and showing that the leadership of the team is not biased?
Click to expand...

the question should be...how did Mueller find out about those texts to his girlfriend?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
This isn't a trick question. I'm honestly curious to understand where you're coming from on this. My understanding is that Mueller found out a member of the team was biased against Trump and removed that person. Isn't that a good thing and showing that the leadership of the team is not biased?
Click to expand...

Hiding the reasons he was removed from Congress that's overseeing it isn't a problem for you? Mueller hasn't removed Andrew Weissman in spite of his biased work for Clinton. And these are the first two that have come to light in FOIA requests published. Go back and read about all the Clinton donors that were put on Mueller's team from the beginning. When folks brought it up, it got dismissed. Now one of those agents got demoted, and there should be more that get dumped also.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
More than likely pissed off the girlfriend or his wife got involved and girlfriend tried to save her own ass.
Click to expand...

just found out that those texts are being turned over to congress....I understand the fbi put up a fight about turning them over-from what I understand the fbi hasn't been very willing on a lot of things.

1st thing I read when I got home today was trumps bank records being looked at, then I hear sarah Huckabee saying they are not...more fake news?
 
youngandfree said:
Hiding the reasons he was removed from Congress that's overseeing it isn't a problem for you? Mueller hasn't removed Andrew Weissman in spite of his biased work for Clinton. And these are the first two that have come to light in FOIA requests published. Go back and read about all the Clinton donors that were put on Mueller's team from the beginning. When folks brought it up, it got dismissed. Now one of those agents got demoted, and there shold be more that get dumped also.
Click to expand...

forget I asked
 
Best of luck to the employees of the soon-to-be American embassy in Jerusalem. Benghazi is going to look like a tea party compared to what will more than likely happen there.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Best of luck to the employees of the soon-to-be American embassy in Jerusalem. Benghazi is going to look like a tea party compared to what will more than likely happen there.
Click to expand...


it's just talk for now...I've heard it could take 2-3 years to make this happen, a lot could change in that length of time.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Best of luck to the employees of the soon-to-be American embassy in Jerusalem. Benghazi is going to look like a tea party compared to what will more than likely happen there.
Click to expand...

That was a different situation, that was a assassination by the US on Senator Stevens as he wasnt complying on the plan to smuggle Khaddafi's guns to "peaceful" rebels in other countries.

I can always picture a small level attack by real terrorists in Jerusalem, but they will be untouchable for the most part unless there was an all out war.
 
ax1 said:
That was a different situation, that was a assassination by the US on Senator Stevens as he wasnt complying on the plan to smuggle Khaddafi's guns to "peaceful" rebels in other countries.

I can always picture a small level attack by real terrorists in Jerusalem, but they will be untouchable for the most part unless there was an all out war.
Click to expand...

Because Netanyahu won't look the other way to create a reason for war? lmao
 
john conyers and al franken are sacrificial lambs...the dems are willing to sacrifice them to gain credibility to go after trump.

imo, this is a strategic move on the part of democrats to get to their ultimate goal-the removal of Donald trump as president.

this is not something I heard anywhere else, this is my own thought.
 
thebigt said:
john conyers and al franken are sacrificial lambs...the dems are willing to sacrifice them to gain credibility to go after trump.

imo, this is a strategic move on the part of democrats to get to their ultimate goal-the removal of Donald trump as president.

this is not something I heard anywhere else this is my own thought.
Click to expand...

Links?

LOL

Incredible boxing match on Saturday, they should make more money than gayweather and Conner imo. This should be a ppv not free tv.

I have a feeling Ringo will outpoint Lomenchenko, but rooting for Lomo he is way more fun.
 
ax1 said:
Links?

LOL

Incredible boxing match on Saturday, they should make more money than gayweather and Conner imo. This should be a ppv not free tv.

I have a feeling Ringo will outpoint Lomenchenko, but rooting for Lomo he is way more fun.
Click to expand...

i'm all in with lomo.
 
ax1 said:
Links?

LOL

Incredible boxing match on Saturday, they should make more money than gayweather and Conner imo. This should be a ppv not free tv.

I have a feeling Ringo will outpoint Lomenchenko, but rooting for Lomo he is way more fun.
Click to expand...

Ringo is a very hard hitter with a keen eye. My bet is Ringo wins by KO, probably a body shot. Love Lomanchenko's style, especially the sliding side steps.
 
hairygrandpa said:
Ringo is a very hard hitter with a keen eye. My bet is Ringo wins by KO, probably a body shot. Love Lomanchenko's style, especially the sliding side steps.
Click to expand...

Ringo has alot of pop in his own weight class, but he is going up 2 weight classes, thats a huge difference and Lomo is too good to get knocked out by a little guy. I think he just sticks to pure boxing, keeps it safe and wins on technicality of skills, and thats says alot I consider Lomo a boxing master.

Ringo deserves incredible props for going up.
 
ax1 said:
Ringo has alot of pop in his own weight class, but he is going up 2 weight classes, thats a huge difference and Lomo is too good to get knocked out by a little guy. I think he just sticks to pure boxing, keeps it safe and wins on technicality of skills, and thats says alot I consider Lomo a boxer master.

Ringo deserves incredible props for going up.
Click to expand...

I endorse this statement!!!

you've done your homework ax1, well said!!!
 
ax1 said:
Ringo has alot of pop in his own weight class, but he is going up 2 weight classes, thats a huge difference and Lomo is too good to get knocked out by a little guy. I think he just sticks to pure boxing, keeps it safe and wins on technicality of skills, and thats says alot I consider Lomo a boxing master.

Ringo deserves incredible props for going up.
Click to expand...

thebigt said:
I endorse this statement!!!

you've done your homework ax1, well said!!!
Click to expand...

Both are are the real deal.
We will see. :)
 
youngandfree said:
I don't recall saying I supported him. Your comment would suggest you don't have a problem with someone making false claims to take down someone.
Click to expand...

No, I think it's quite telling that this is the first time you or bigt were willing to discuss the Moore issue. Republicans don't want to take responsibility for anything which is not new. You support Trump and Trump and the Republicans support Moore, so you get to own everything Moore is about. That's exactly what you do with Democrats.

You and the other Republicans on here have kept quiet about Moore until one of the victims admitted that she made up part of her story and so now you want to focus on that and not on the fact that there are plenty of other allegations. It was the same thing with the liar at CNN. Even though the Russian investigation continues to show more and more of what we were promised didn't exist by the Republicans, you and the other Republicans want to focus on the liar who exaggerated what Flynn said and tried to play it off that he wasn't talking at all.

As for your interpretation on my comment, that's simply your tactic for avoiding topics that you're not able to actually discuss or debate. I ask you a simple straight forward question and you respond with "OH so you have no problem with (fill in the blank)". Trump supporters are just like Trump in that they can't have an intelligent conversation and have to fall back on distractions. Somebody simply questions one of Trump's actions and the typical Trump supporter reaction is to yell something about Hillary.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
No, I think it's quite telling that this is the first time you or bigt were willing to discuss the Moore issue. Republicans don't want to take responsibility for anything which is not new. You support Trump and Trump and the Republicans support Moore, so you get to own everything Moore is about. That's exactly what you do with Democrats.

You and the other Republicans on here have kept quiet about Moore until one of the victims admitted that she made up part of her story and so now you want to focus on that and not on the fact that there are plenty of other allegations. It was the same thing with the liar at CNN. Even though the Russian investigation continues to show more and more of what we were promised didn't exist by the Republicans, you and the other Republicans want to focus on the liar who exaggerated what Flynn said and tried to play it off that he wasn't talking at all.

As for your interpretation on my comment, that's simply your tactic for avoiding topics that you're not able to actually discuss or debate. I ask you a simple straight forward question and you respond with "OH so you have no problem with (fill in the blank)". Trump supporters are just like Trump in that they can't have an intelligent conversation and have to fall back on distractions. Somebody simply questions one of Trump's actions and the typical Trump supporter reaction is to yell something about Hillary.
Click to expand...

That's the same tactic you use. You don't like if someone makes an inference on your comment but you make a 3 paragraph long inference on someone else's.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
No, I think it's quite telling that this is the first time you or bigt were willing to discuss the Moore issue. Republicans don't want to take responsibility for anything which is not new. You support Trump and Trump and the Republicans support Moore, so you get to own everything Moore is about. That's exactly what you do with Democrats.

You and the other Republicans on here have kept quiet about Moore until one of the victims admitted that she made up part of her story and so now you want to focus on that and not on the fact that there are plenty of other allegations. It was the same thing with the liar at CNN. Even though the Russian investigation continues to show more and more of what we were promised didn't exist by the Republicans, you and the other Republicans want to focus on the liar who exaggerated what Flynn said and tried to play it off that he wasn't talking at all.

As for your interpretation on my comment, that's simply your tactic for avoiding topics that you're not able to actually discuss or debate. I ask you a simple straight forward question and you respond with "OH so you have no problem with (fill in the blank)". Trump supporters are just like Trump in that they can't have an intelligent conversation and have to fall back on distractions. Somebody simply questions one of Trump's actions and the typical Trump supporter reaction is to yell something about Hillary.
Click to expand...

I guess republicans are just a basketful of deplorables, eh.....

you see where that tactic got good old Hillary, lol....my money says moore wins for that very reason!!!!
 
thebigt said:
I guess republicans are just a basketful of deplorables, eh.....

you see where that tactic got good old Hillary, lol....my money says moore wins for that very reason!!!!
Click to expand...
And the people who vote for him are idiots and deserve the crap they get.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top