Disproportional loss of gains?

[drake117]

Ok. so i did what i'll call my first cycle (more accurately i tried out all sorts of steroids for six months at conservative doses). i finished up a little over a month ago. I expected to lose some of the weight gain seeing as how i had put on 30 pounds. I have lost about ten of it and i am sure some of it was fat and water weight. some is most likely muscle though.

The point is that i haven't noticed much loss in muscle mass on my upper body. Some in my chest but mostly in my legs. Throughout the cycle some pants became unwearable :fing02: , but now fit again. However some older shirts that i cant wear now still don't fit. Have any of you guys noticed disproportional weight loss after a cycle?

 

[drake117]

Bump

 

[1test]

Being on gear just amplifies how your body would respond naturally.
It could simply mean that you lose mass on legs before anywhere else irrelevant to steroids

 

[ChocolateClen]

Maybe you put on a significant amount of muscle on your legs in comparison to everywhere else, so you noticed it because your legs gained a lot and now you lost some?

 

[drake117]

Being on gear just amplifies how your body would respond naturally.
It could simply mean that you lose mass on legs before anywhere else irrelevant to steroids

Thanks I have always had small legs so that would be logical.

 

[drake117]

Maybe you put on a significant amount of muscle on your legs in comparison to everywhere else, so you noticed it because your legs gained a lot and now you lost some?

I did put on over an inch for sure so it could be. Its crazy how different our bodies are. I hold almost no fat in my face or arms but I do in my legs and over my center abs.

 

[GreekTheBrick]

If it matters, I find myself that I have to do legs twice a week to keep up with the rest of the body. Either on or off cycle

 

[ChocolateClen]

Your legs are also a large muscle group so there's more room for them grow, and also to shrink lol