Guest viewing is limited

Dimethandrostenol transdermal?

JeremyNG25

JeremyNG25

Active member
Does anyone know if this hormone can be made into a transdermal or would it not pass well through the skin? I have access to some powder and am just curious is all. Thanks for any help!
 
Pretty sure molecular weight is to high. But i could be wrong.
 
harbonah said:
Where did you see the Molecular weight? Just curious.
Click to expand...


well, one could determine this info themselves if they know the nomenclature. but I don't think he knows how to do it. lol. I don't either, I'd have to go back an look it up.
but I know anyone can figure out the mw of a compound themselves if they know some simple math.
 
jbryand101b said:
well, one could determine this info themselves if they know the nomenclature. but I don't think he knows how to do it. lol. I don't either, I'd have to go back an look it up.
but I know anyone can figure out the mw of a compound themselves if they know some simple math.
Click to expand...
True, I have just never seen it listed so I asked where he had seen it.
 
harbonah said:
True, I have just never seen it listed so I asked where he had seen it.
Click to expand...
Which is odd looking at the suppliers sites most hormones have MW listed yet this one is not.
 
MW of superdrol = 318
Only difference between superdrol and dimethandrostenol is dimethandrostenol has a double bond around the ring instead of a carbonyl group. At a quick glance the hydrogens should be the same, you just have to subtract the molecular weight of the oxygen. I'm using my iphone to look at the structures of both of them so I may be missing a hydrogen but overall the number will be in the ballpark

318-16=302 for dimethandrostenol
 
harbonah said:
Where did you see the Molecular weight? Just curious.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure someone Listed it in a thread on another forum back when Mithras hit the market. Probably using the formula jbry was talking about. But it was quite a while ago and I couldn't remember exactly, that's why I threw in I believe.
jbryand101b said:
well, one could determine this info themselves if they know the nomenclature. but I don't think he knows how to do it. lol. I don't either, I'd have to go back an look it up.
but I know anyone can figure out the mw of a compound themselves if they know some simple math.
Click to expand...

Thanks for believing in me buddy ;) but yeah, I don't know how.
 
reps4jesus said:
Pretty sure someone Listed it in a thread on another forum back when Mithras hit the market. Probably using the formula jbry was talking about. But it was quite a while ago and I couldn't remember exactly, that's why I threw in I believe.


Thanks for believing in me buddy ;) but yeah, I don't know how.
Click to expand...

All good just had not seen it listed.
 
For the dimethandrostenol the raws are not up on this site yet but will be this weekend. Find the company that used to make ostanish and you will have the raws. Hope I didn't break a rule here
 
5ourdiesel said:
MW of superdrol = 318
Only difference between superdrol and dimethandrostenol is dimethandrostenol has a double bond around the ring instead of a carbonyl group. At a quick glance the hydrogens should be the same, you just have to subtract the molecular weight of the oxygen. I'm using my iphone to look at the structures of both of them so I may be missing a hydrogen but overall the number will be in the ballpark

318-16=302 for dimethandrostenol
Click to expand...

Invalid Link Removed
 
The Engineer said:
Thanks.

If the mw is less than 500, we could theoretically use it with IL Salvo, correct?
Click to expand...

Like Jbry says, it would be a waste, because absorption would be markedly worse. The best compounds for TDs are active non-methyls. If you have dimethandrostenol powder you're better off making an oral solution.
 
henryv said:
Like Jbry says, it would be a waste, because absorption would be markedly worse. The best compounds for TDs are active non-methyls. If you have dimethandrostenol powder you're better off making an oral solution.
Click to expand...

This might sound stupid, and I'm only thinking out loud here:
Dimethandrostenol is sd + phera

SD: 2a,17a-dimethyl-5a-androst-3-one-17b-ol
Phera: 17a-methyl-etioallocholan-2-ene-17b-ol

Also to note, Methyl group was added at position 2 of dimethandrostenol to protect the double bond from being broken by the addition of a hydroxyl group to position 2 or 3.

So with that said, in order for a TD option to be viable... crap. NVM. You'd need Masteron (SD) and Delta-2 (phera) for their unmethylated forms.

Dammit...
 
The Engineer said:
This might sound stupid, and I'm only thinking out loud here:
Dimethandrostenol is sd + phera
Click to expand...

It's not, it's a different compound with structural similarities to both.

The Engineer said:
Also to note, Methyl group was added at position 2 of dimethandrostenol to protect the double bond from being broken by the addition of a hydroxyl group to position 2 or 3.
Click to expand...

Please don't quote from that disinformation site.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top