Countries with the highest testosterone levels!

Cheeky Monkey

Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed

Mongolia number 1 with avg test levels at 693. Must be the horse milk/horse meat or maybe Genghis Khan's conquering/ravaging genes.

USA at 420 (by the way, another map showed that Portland, OR has the highest average test levels in the US at 614, with Florida in second place at 569. The Midwest states had the lowest averaging 350).

Lowest is Venezuela with the average male at 290. I find that very hard to believe given just how dangerous and crime-infested Venezuela is. You'd think everyone would be on edge and aggressive.
 
Invalid Link Removed

Mongolia number 1 with avg test levels at 693. Must be the horse milk/horse meat or maybe Genghis Khan's conquering/ravaging genes.

USA at 420 (by the way, another map showed that Portland, OR has the highest average test levels in the US at 614, with Florida in second place at 569. The Midwest states had the lowest averaging 350).

Lowest is Venezuela with the average male at 290. I find that very hard to believe given just how dangerous and crime-infested Venezuela is. You'd think everyone would be on edge and aggressive.
I think low T can be associated with irrational anger and mood swings though
 
Actually if you think about it, one common factor is the top test countries is that their diet is primarily meat and fat. Minimal carbs or very high fiber carbs. Whereas in low-test countries, there is an abundance of fried foods, sweets, large amounts of refined carbs, etc.
 
Invalid Link Removed

Mongolia number 1 with avg test levels at 693. Must be the horse milk/horse meat or maybe Genghis Khan's conquering/ravaging genes.

USA at 420 (by the way, another map showed that Portland, OR has the highest average test levels in the US at 614, with Florida in second place at 569. The Midwest states had the lowest averaging 350).

Lowest is Venezuela with the average male at 290. I find that very hard to believe given just how dangerous and crime-infested Venezuela is. You'd think everyone would be on edge and aggressive.
But are they testing criminals testosterone levels?
 
Violent criminals tend have higher testosterone levels than non-violent criminals but people in prison have lower test then gen pop as a whole.



I also think that you guys need to remember that the whole world has low testosterone. In the 1950's The average man had a testosterone level over a 1000.



High testosterone in todays world is still lower then it should be. Having high test doesnt make people mean or angry that's just the nonsense that the world pushes upon you because they want you to be a f* p*** and tuck your Dick between your legs
 
I issue this challenge to anyone, run 500 test and then crash your test and see which one makes you feel violent or angry
 
Invalid Link Removed

Mongolia number 1 with avg test levels at 693. Must be the horse milk/horse meat or maybe Genghis Khan's conquering/ravaging genes.

USA at 420 (by the way, another map showed that Portland, OR has the highest average test levels in the US at 614, with Florida in second place at 569. The Midwest states had the lowest averaging 350).

Lowest is Venezuela with the average male at 290. I find that very hard to believe given just how dangerous and crime-infested Venezuela is. You'd think everyone would be on edge and aggressive.

I know some people from Venezuela.... I'm curious as to how they'll react, when I share this with them.
:)
 
This thread is hilarious. Trying to equate singular outcomes to a single hormonal measure while ignoring all the potentially innumerable other variables is quite entertaining.

Always easy to prove your points when you can dismiss things when they don’t match your opinion and just make up statistics with no backing to strengthen your stance.

Idk what you were looking for here, but I think the question about who was being measured probably does the best job pointing out the problem with something like this. Whenever you find an article or something of this nature it’s best to look at where or how it is gathering this info. Trying to piece together numbers from various places into a singular list can have a ton of issues and definitely is going to limit the scope of how you can use those numbers to try and make inferences about how that can be interpreted in regards to other factors.

Just having some fun bro. Nothing personal.
 
Back to the being on edge or agression stuff. Like countries with high crime. Think about that for a min. Being on edge and looking over your shoulder and tuned up all the time.. . .... stress, stress, stress= low testosterone, or at least it can. Stress has a massive effect on many hormones. Stress fucks with your sleep, stress hinders your recovery ability. Being a gangster isn't always very gangster on your hormones.

As for the numbers being accurate, who got tested? I didnt. did any of you???? I dont think anyone is taking the #'s very seriously
 
Back to the being on edge or aggression stuff. Like countries with high crime. Think about that for a min. Being on edge and looking over your shoulder and tuned up all the time.. . .... stress, stress, stress= low testosterone, or at least it can. Stress has a massive effect on many hormones. Stress fucks with your sleep, stress hinders your recovery ability. Being a gangster isn't always very gangster on your hormones.

As for the numbers being accurate, who got tested? I didnt. did any of you???? I dont think anyone is taking the #'s very seriously

I can Testify to the effects of stress, and lack of sleep over time.
So bad for our health.
Thankfully, it didn't effect my own Test levels... But it was nonetheless Destructive.
 
That’s fine. I’m just saying you have to be careful how much weight you put in this stuff. Just because something is posted doesn’t mean it has the same strength of evidence as something else.

I mean do most people even look where this data even come from? It’s single “source” is testosteronedecline .com. Where do they even get their info? It’s even harder to follow where that gets its info from as it sometimes links studies and sometimes just circles back to its own articles as a source. It’s drawing that table from various studies over various time periods with some countries getting more data points than others. Etc.


It always just turns into these weird circle jerks instead of taking it for what it is. If you want to just have fun with it that’s fine.

You know, off topic, but researchers did a study on Gen Z (18-25 year olds) and their consumption of news/information sources. Almost all of them said they get their information from social media, particularly TikTok. When asked how they knew if the information they received was correct or not, shockingly majority of them said that they didn't care about the credibility of the information; all they cared about was whether it was liked or popular by viewers. If the majority of viewers liked the video or news, then they would accept it as legit.
 
Back
Top