AnthroLats
New member
I know that this is definitely overthinking and overcomplicating matters, but I like the science so bear with me.
Generally when I see people talking about recomps, or caloric intake for that matter, gain or loss is always deferred to the daily intake, or sometimes even the weekly. I've seen many opinions state that its your total caloric intake for the week that will determine your composition changes, and many also state that you can't burn fat and build muscle in a 24 hour period. My question is, why not?
Lets assume the following hypothetical day.
8AM: Wake up, take some supplements. ECA, Alpha-Y, Forskolin, and maybe something else synergistic
8:30AM: Fasted cardio for 30 minutes
At this point, from the low insulin levels combined with stims and the supposed forskolin synergy, I would assume my body is in tip top shape for some lipolytic action to happen.
Then lets say I fast for a while longer.
2:00PM: Hit the gym, maybe sip some BCAAs prior/during
3:30-11PM: Eat 500-800 calories over maintenance with 40/40/20 macro intake
12PM: Sleep
Under these circumstances, would:
A. The fat you "burned" in the morning be long gone, and the post workout meal be more beneficial to helping recovery and build muscle
B. The fat you "burned" in the morning effectively come back due to the overfeeding.
I guess what I'm trying to find out is, if or how does the whole "fat coming back" process work during the time that you eat. Say if I were to eat at maintenance, by standard logic, all of the calories I ate would simply come back as fat negating the morning cardio, without any actual change in composition.
I'm speaking all in theoreticals here, any opinions are greatly appreciated, but please refrain from telling me I'm overthinking it, because I'm already well aware of that.
Generally when I see people talking about recomps, or caloric intake for that matter, gain or loss is always deferred to the daily intake, or sometimes even the weekly. I've seen many opinions state that its your total caloric intake for the week that will determine your composition changes, and many also state that you can't burn fat and build muscle in a 24 hour period. My question is, why not?
Lets assume the following hypothetical day.
8AM: Wake up, take some supplements. ECA, Alpha-Y, Forskolin, and maybe something else synergistic
8:30AM: Fasted cardio for 30 minutes
At this point, from the low insulin levels combined with stims and the supposed forskolin synergy, I would assume my body is in tip top shape for some lipolytic action to happen.
Then lets say I fast for a while longer.
2:00PM: Hit the gym, maybe sip some BCAAs prior/during
3:30-11PM: Eat 500-800 calories over maintenance with 40/40/20 macro intake
12PM: Sleep
Under these circumstances, would:
A. The fat you "burned" in the morning be long gone, and the post workout meal be more beneficial to helping recovery and build muscle
B. The fat you "burned" in the morning effectively come back due to the overfeeding.
I guess what I'm trying to find out is, if or how does the whole "fat coming back" process work during the time that you eat. Say if I were to eat at maintenance, by standard logic, all of the calories I ate would simply come back as fat negating the morning cardio, without any actual change in composition.
I'm speaking all in theoreticals here, any opinions are greatly appreciated, but please refrain from telling me I'm overthinking it, because I'm already well aware of that.