Greetings,
So i wanted to ask a few questions about something i have been researching recently.
Basically, i am constructing my next blast which will be a recomp. And i would like to stick to test and masteron.
Also, it seems like a good idea to confirm/bust some of the myhts concerning trenbolone.
So, lets begin...
Lets say someone can only handle 150-200mg of tren. Anymore than that and psychological side effects are too much. Now, from anecdotal evidence from people who had used both compounds, it seems that tren builds about 3x as much muscle than test on a same dose (say 200 tren = 600 test). Some ncbi studies i read seem to agree on this (qutoing tren has 3x the androgen receptor binding affinitiy than that of test ).
We also know from anecdotal evidence from people who used it that masteron build about 2/3 as much muscke as test. So, my question is, in your opinion, should a stack of 300 test/400 masteron yield similar muscle building/retaining results as 150-200mg of tren? On paper they would be really close as far as anabolic potency goes, and this stack should keep you pretty dry and hard (provided you use an AI of course, as needed).
And that stack should still be less toxic to your heart, kidneys etc. than 150-200mg of tren?
Also, there are potential neurodegenerative side- effects of tren which need to be taken into the account.
***Lately i have been seeing some people (including Seth Spartan) talking about how trenbolone is safer long term than testosterone, because some minor study showed that it protects the heart in rats. Also, that it seems to be more selective in its binding to the AR.
Some even suggest it as a possible form of TRT, because of its more selective nature (which is crazy to me)
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189634/) <---- this one is interesting
https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/157/1/368/2251856 <---- i am actually trying to make sense of this study. It seems to be contradicting everything we know about trenbolone so far, ie. its harshness etc.
I just dont know. From peoples accounts it seems that heart muscle tends to get over stimulated by trenbolone, ie. chronically elevated heart rate.
What do you all think?
Edit: Just as a side note, eople say that masteron doesnt do anything for their strength. I digress. There is no way in hell for me to hit my pressing numbers I was hitting while on 400mg of masteron right now. The aggression in the gym was on another level. I wish i could run it at 400+ pw for prolonged periods of time. But it causes me panic attacks amd i was all around a mental mess. Felt like i was going to lose my mind at times.
So i wanted to ask a few questions about something i have been researching recently.
Basically, i am constructing my next blast which will be a recomp. And i would like to stick to test and masteron.
Also, it seems like a good idea to confirm/bust some of the myhts concerning trenbolone.
So, lets begin...
Lets say someone can only handle 150-200mg of tren. Anymore than that and psychological side effects are too much. Now, from anecdotal evidence from people who had used both compounds, it seems that tren builds about 3x as much muscle than test on a same dose (say 200 tren = 600 test). Some ncbi studies i read seem to agree on this (qutoing tren has 3x the androgen receptor binding affinitiy than that of test ).
We also know from anecdotal evidence from people who used it that masteron build about 2/3 as much muscke as test. So, my question is, in your opinion, should a stack of 300 test/400 masteron yield similar muscle building/retaining results as 150-200mg of tren? On paper they would be really close as far as anabolic potency goes, and this stack should keep you pretty dry and hard (provided you use an AI of course, as needed).
And that stack should still be less toxic to your heart, kidneys etc. than 150-200mg of tren?
Also, there are potential neurodegenerative side- effects of tren which need to be taken into the account.
***Lately i have been seeing some people (including Seth Spartan) talking about how trenbolone is safer long term than testosterone, because some minor study showed that it protects the heart in rats. Also, that it seems to be more selective in its binding to the AR.
Some even suggest it as a possible form of TRT, because of its more selective nature (which is crazy to me)
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6189634/) <---- this one is interesting
https://academic.oup.com/endo/article/157/1/368/2251856 <---- i am actually trying to make sense of this study. It seems to be contradicting everything we know about trenbolone so far, ie. its harshness etc.
I just dont know. From peoples accounts it seems that heart muscle tends to get over stimulated by trenbolone, ie. chronically elevated heart rate.
What do you all think?
Edit: Just as a side note, eople say that masteron doesnt do anything for their strength. I digress. There is no way in hell for me to hit my pressing numbers I was hitting while on 400mg of masteron right now. The aggression in the gym was on another level. I wish i could run it at 400+ pw for prolonged periods of time. But it causes me panic attacks amd i was all around a mental mess. Felt like i was going to lose my mind at times.
Last edited: