Clen on cycle

[Shiznitzz]

Im looking to prepare for my next cycle around march to get ready for summer, I've had some good solid gains with this cycle but will be looking to cut all this extra fat off once spring rolls around.

I got feedback for this cycle previously:

Eq 600mg 12wks
Test 400mg 12wks
Winny 50mg 6-8wks

Looking into adding clen into this cycle for its fat burning benefit, I have a strong heart and have never had any issues, a skipped beat once every few months would be the most I ever experience with my heart.

Thoughts?

 

[DemntedCowboy]

Im looking to prepare for my next cycle around march to get ready for summer, I've had some good solid gains with this cycle but will be looking to cut all this extra fat off once spring rolls around.

I got feedback for this cycle previously:

Eq 600mg 12wks
Test 400mg 12wks
Winny 50mg 6-8wks

Looking into adding clen into this cycle for its fat burning benefit, I have a strong heart and have never had any issues, a skipped beat once every few months would be the most I ever experience with my heart.

Thoughts?

You wont need the Clen

 

[Whisky]

You wont need the Clen

Unless you are already very lean and trying to go low single digit bf you shouldn’t need the clen. If you do then your diet is off.

Why risk it?

I’d lower the test to 300 and run the winny last 6 weeks.

Eq is normally run longer than 12 weeks but for a cut I imagine that’ll work. You might want to front load though

 

[Shiznitzz]

Unless you are already very lean and trying to go low single digit bf you shouldn’t need the clen. If you do then your diet is off.

Why risk it?

I’d lower the test to 300 and run the winny last 6 weeks.

Eq is normally run longer than 12 weeks but for a cut I imagine that’ll work. You might want to front load though

I could front load on the eq for 2 weeks and add in the test, run test for 12 with eq 14.

Run winny from weeks 6 to 12? I see the benefit of this instead of on the front end. Why lower test to 300 instead of 400? Just straight waste?

 

[Whisky]

I could front load on the eq for 2 weeks and add in the test, run test for 12 with eq 14.

Run winny from weeks 6 to 12? I see the benefit of this instead of on the front end. Why lower test to 300 instead of 400? Just straight waste?

Eq aromatises to estro and about half the rate test does. On a cutting cycle most would want to keep estro low to get the dry hard look (the beach body). Ergo it’s pointless running test higher than you need for the general well being and feel good as you’ll start to negate the point of running eq in this context.

To be fair my logic for finishing with winny is simply that I’d be wanting to come off as lean and dry as poss but no reason I can think not to start with it either.

Should be noted I’ve not run test and eq together by the way, but have read up on eq recently as I’m looking at it myself for next year

 

[Shiznitzz]

Eq aromatises to estro and about half the rate test does. On a cutting cycle most would want to keep estro low to get the dry hard look (the beach body). Ergo it’s pointless running test higher than you need for the general well being and feel good as you’ll start to negate the point of running eq in this context.

To be fair my logic for finishing with winny is simply that I’d be wanting to come off as lean and dry as poss but no reason I can think not to start with it either.

Should be noted I’ve not run test and eq together by the way, but have read up on eq recently as I’m looking at it myself for next year

Alright, I can drop the test to 300, run eq 600/wk front loaded for 2 weeks, then finish off with winny from weeks 6-12.

I'll more than likely use exemestane for estro, keep it low for the dry look. I'll just not use clen, no real point.