What do you huys think would be better for strength and size: Celtic One or Msten. Celtics msten is out of stock. Im just wondering if msten is worth 20 more dollars than celtic one.
What do you huys think would be better for strength and size: Celtic One or Msten. Celtics msten is out of stock. Im just wondering if msten is worth 20 more dollars than celtic one.
If im mot mistaken celtic one is a clone of legal gears alpha1 its a ph to M1T I would say they are both strong , I ran both back in 08 I would say alpha1 which would be today celtic 1 helped me put on 20 pounds also gave me some wicked lethargy deff would not run it today without a test base.
If im mot mistaken celtic one is a clone of legal gears alpha1 its a ph to M1T I would say they are both strong , I ran both back in 08 alpha1 which would be today celtic 1 helped me put on 20 pounds also gave me some wicked lethargy deff would not run it today without a test base. Msten for me was a dryer cycle.
Alpha 1 is not the ph to m1tIf im mot mistaken celtic one is a clone of legal gears alpha1 its a ph to M1T I would say they are both strong , I ran both back in 08 alpha1 which would be today celtic 1 helped me put on 20 pounds also gave me some wicked lethargy deff would not run it today without a test base. Msten for me was a dryer cycle.
Thanks for the input. What about Super DMZ 3.0, how does it compare to these. I ran 2.0 last summer and had some decent gains, but was looking to try something else this cycle. Any of u tried dmz 3.0.
Alpha 1 is not the ph to m1t
From what I know its already active and just a small % converts to m1t.Was under the impression it converted to m1 test? Please enlighten me
From what I know its already active and just a small % converts to m1t.
Maybe someone more knowledgeable can chime in[/QUOTE
Methyl 1 alpha gave me similar gains to sd back in the day I think the coversion to m1t isnt small deff stronger then msten and dmz ]
I'm running 2.0 with dermatrest.i enjoy itThanks for the input. What about Super DMZ 3.0, how does it compare to these. I ran 2.0 last summer and had some decent gains, but was looking to try something else this cycle. Any of u tried dmz 3.0.
I would have to side with Celtic One. I've used both and it's going to build more size/strength. Msten is more of a lean bulker. It still gives good size but not as much.
How did the side effects of celtic one compare to sdmz. My side effects were not too bad with sdmz. Also, have any of you tried celtic mass.
Celtic one is stronger then dmz and celtic mass it also carries more sides, I got very painful back pumps + lethargy sucks if you dont run a test base I ran legal gears Methyl 1 Alpha (back around 2007) which is the same as celtic one I gained 20 lbs in 4 weeks strength went thru the roof
What do you huys think would be better for strength and size: Celtic One or Msten. Celtics msten is out of stock. Im just wondering if msten is worth 20 more dollars than celtic one.
What do you huys think would be better for strength and size: Celtic One or Msten. Celtics msten is out of stock. Im just wondering if msten is worth 20 more dollars than celtic one.
How is Msten on the hair line does it cause any shedding?I would have to side with Celtic One. I've used both and it's going to build more size/strength. Msten is more of a lean bulker. It still gives good size but not as much.