WLIFTCJ33
New member
- Awards
- 0
Hey guys,
Background:
- I'm 22
- 6'2" 240lbs
- %bf = 10 - 14 (possibly less I am not sure, will update that when I find it)
- lifting for 5 years - 3 1/2 have been serious
- Long story short -> started at 180 sumthin lbs; throughout college to my junior year gained around 90 sumthin lbs (270 sumthin lbs fairly lean); BAM!!!! -> tore my acl; Have been out around a year and back down to around 240 lbs (leaner than before due to immense HIIT cardio I have been doing to heal and get in shape).
Supplements currently on:
Protein
Multi
L Arg.
BCAAs
Omegas
Will most likely pick up creatine for bulking phase
Will also most likely get a preworkout.
Dilemma:
I have done OTC PHs before and have had some decent results with them. I find it fairly easy to put on lean muscle, and I have no problem with eating a massive amount of food to do so. I would like to start getting into a cycle with some legit gear, but I'm not sure if I know enough about cycling and the compounds. I mean, I have read up on them for months and learned about the different profiles, what I should take at my weight, PCTs/ SERMs, etc. but I am not sure if I am ready to use all of it yet, and even if I was, I have no source.
Thus, this brings me to the main point. I have read a lot about Anabeta and the Andro series. I know it is not really a comparison between the two, but which would give me a better bang for my buck; AndroMass and AndroHard or Anabeta stacked with something. I am just talking pure.lean.mass. I just don't want to waste my money either way. I know that Anabeta says it needs no PCT, but I am a bit of a worrywart. So is it true it would need no PCT? Also, for AndroMass and Hard, would Sustain from PP be enough for the PCT? Or is it all a waste of my time and I should stop being a wuss and get some Dbol and test E?
Any input to this would be appreciated!
Background:
- I'm 22
- 6'2" 240lbs
- %bf = 10 - 14 (possibly less I am not sure, will update that when I find it)
- lifting for 5 years - 3 1/2 have been serious
- Long story short -> started at 180 sumthin lbs; throughout college to my junior year gained around 90 sumthin lbs (270 sumthin lbs fairly lean); BAM!!!! -> tore my acl; Have been out around a year and back down to around 240 lbs (leaner than before due to immense HIIT cardio I have been doing to heal and get in shape).
Supplements currently on:
Protein
Multi
L Arg.
BCAAs
Omegas
Will most likely pick up creatine for bulking phase
Will also most likely get a preworkout.
Dilemma:
I have done OTC PHs before and have had some decent results with them. I find it fairly easy to put on lean muscle, and I have no problem with eating a massive amount of food to do so. I would like to start getting into a cycle with some legit gear, but I'm not sure if I know enough about cycling and the compounds. I mean, I have read up on them for months and learned about the different profiles, what I should take at my weight, PCTs/ SERMs, etc. but I am not sure if I am ready to use all of it yet, and even if I was, I have no source.
Thus, this brings me to the main point. I have read a lot about Anabeta and the Andro series. I know it is not really a comparison between the two, but which would give me a better bang for my buck; AndroMass and AndroHard or Anabeta stacked with something. I am just talking pure.lean.mass. I just don't want to waste my money either way. I know that Anabeta says it needs no PCT, but I am a bit of a worrywart. So is it true it would need no PCT? Also, for AndroMass and Hard, would Sustain from PP be enough for the PCT? Or is it all a waste of my time and I should stop being a wuss and get some Dbol and test E?
Any input to this would be appreciated!