Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Best and legit sarm companies

M.I.D

Well-known member
Hi guys

What are the best and most legit sarm companies atm?

Are liquid research SARMs the way to go?
 
Invalid Link Removed

You can watch that if you want. The guy has four sarms companies’ ostarine tested and all of them came back legit. Some were slightly underdosed. Instead of 25mg in a ml there was 22.7mg per ml. I use purerawz. They’re one of the companies tested in the video. I use their tabs because they’re cheaper than capsules or liquid. All their stuff is legit and it makes no sense when people claim only liquid sarms are real.
 
Just gonna toss this out there, and the sarms guys can chime in since I’m no expert on these drugs; but there’s dozens if not hundreds of logs where guys used sarms and had labs that showed trashed lipids, elevated liver enzymes, and pretty much indisputable suppression. So my question(and I apologize for the hijack) is if many have side effects similar to aas, are they really a validated alternative?
 
Just gonna toss this out there, and the sarms guys can chime in since I’m no expert on these drugs; but there’s dozens if not hundreds of logs where guys used sarms and had labs that showed trashed lipids, elevated liver enzymes, and pretty much indisputable suppression. So my question(and I apologize for the hijack) is if many have side effects similar to aas, are they really a validated alternative?
In my experience liver values are not affected by sarms but supression is significant, especially with YK (which is not really a sarm i guess) and LGD.
 
Just gonna toss this out there, and the sarms guys can chime in since I’m no expert on these drugs; but there’s dozens if not hundreds of logs where guys used sarms and had labs that showed trashed lipids, elevated liver enzymes, and pretty much indisputable suppression. So my question(and I apologize for the hijack) is if many have side effects similar to aas, are they really a validated alternative?

I think the answer to that is no, and in due time that may be the consensus. They definitely carry the same health consequences as oral AAS, but to a less severe degree. They also give way less gains. So is it really a better alternative to steroids? That’s debatable. We’ll see if sarms stick around when they become illegal and harder to access.
 
To make a blanket statement on Sarms crashing lipids, suppressing, basically hinting at the negatives vs. the positives, I feel its up to each individual and how you design to run your cycle.

I look at my body for instance as a science experiment, meaning, when/if I do a cycle, I put in the time, effort to research what I'm putting into my body, then I run it and see how I feel.

In terms of suppression, I've read a ton of threads where everyone says LGD gives them E.D., yet I ran a stack with 10mg of LGD for 8 weeks and my libido was way strong, raging morning wood, I feel the rad140 I ran with it, was the test base as that was a low low dose of RAD.

So what I'm getting at is, will Sarms replace Steroids? No. But they can accelerate recovery, and help you build muscle, if you take your cycle run seriously.

In terms of sides, I know real roids, can cause enlarged organs. Have yet to see anyone running Sarms with this problem. Also I never experienced hair loss or gyno which can happen when running roids. Again, both are great for making gains, it just depends on your preference to which you prefer and how your body responds to either.
 
To make a blanket statement on Sarms crashing lipids, suppressing, basically hinting at the negatives vs. the positives, I feel its up to each individual and how you design to run your cycle.

I look at my body for instance as a science experiment, meaning, when/if I do a cycle, I put in the time, effort to research what I'm putting into my body, then I run it and see how I feel.

In terms of suppression, I've read a ton of threads where everyone says LGD gives them E.D., yet I ran a stack with 10mg of LGD for 8 weeks and my libido was way strong, raging morning wood, I feel the rad140 I ran with it, was the test base as that was a low low dose of RAD.

So what I'm getting at is, will Sarms replace Steroids? No. But they can accelerate recovery, and help you build muscle, if you take your cycle run seriously.

In terms of sides, I know real roids, can cause enlarged organs. Have yet to see anyone running Sarms with this problem. Also I never experienced hair loss or gyno which can happen when running roids. Again, both are great for making gains, it just depends on your preference to which you prefer and how your body responds to either.

Kudos brother.
Like I said, I don’t know Sarms at all, I just read a lot of logs and a lot of labs and have yet to form a real opinion on them.

This is a great way to look at things and thanks for the well thought out response.
 
Just gonna toss this out there, and the sarms guys can chime in since I’m no expert on these drugs; but there’s dozens if not hundreds of logs where guys used sarms and had labs that showed trashed lipids, elevated liver enzymes, and pretty much indisputable suppression. So my question(and I apologize for the hijack) is if many have side effects similar to aas, are they really a validated alternative?

For some people they are an alternative because though they are not as effective at building muscle they are not yet a controlled substance yet unlike aas which are a felony to possess. However, If they get banned, I suspect they will become a lot less popular since they aren’t as effective.
 
Back
Top