Agreed. Great post but I think there is a typo. Pretty sure A-yo is an Alpha-1 antagonist (not alpha-2)
Good work man (last paragraph of yours)
A-yo is an antagonist of alpha 1 and 2. All substrates of yohimbine base bind to alpha 2. Some people believe A-Yo binds to 2 more than yohimbine base, the people at Avant labs use to talk about this over 10 yrs ago, but non-the-less, all this A-yo binds to alpha 1 not 2, its more bro science and it doesn't matter, but alpha 1 and alpha 2 when bound "plugged" by yohimbine (any substrate) will increase noradrenaline and adrenaline. Its just a binding of alpha one increase noradrenaline more than adrenaline.
The bigger difference is how they bind to alpha 2a, 2b and 2c. Basically if you take 10mg of a-yohimbine, 12mg of this 90% Rauwolscine, 10mg of Yohimbine HCL, you will not feel any different from one or the other. Its just companies want you to believe there are some Rauwolfia trees being extracted for rauwolscine which is BS. Actually its not companies want you to believe that, they really don't know. I have dealt with manufactures and suppliers who don't even know the difference between yohimbe, yohimbine HCL and yohimbine base...so its not their fault. They just put in there what everyone else is using.
So if you take any sample of anything labels "Rauwfolia" extract, and send it to Chormadex or any high end lab, the analysis will come back with a % of a-yohimbine HCL.
354.44 g/mol - Rauwolscine C21H26N2O3 (from the tree)
354.44 g/mol - Yohimbine base C21H26N2O3 from the tree)
^^^ There is no way one is "jitter free" ^^
Now yohimbine HCL comes in with a higher mass at over 390 which is how you determine if a product has yohimbine base or yohimbine HCL.
99% of anything sold as "yohimbe bark extract standardized for yohimbine HCL" is technically wrong, you cant standardize yohimbe bark for yohimbine HCL and its just yohimbe with yohimbine HCL added.....same with Rauwfolia. To test this you have to perform a test for alpha-yohimbine HCL.