"Most powerlifters are clinically obese (with no muscle definition), perpetually injured, and, astonishingly, only marginally developed by bodybuilding standards."
i think you will be e-lynched for this sentence right here, and well deserve it
Many people are more interested in performance rather than pretty biceps
Performance is defined by ones sport.
Developing the muscles to look magnificent for show is a body builders performance.
Hmm, I see it differently. I see performance as being a physical phenomenon, not a subjective aesthetic. And lifting a high volume of lighter weights can be a useful training tool, but it will never be as physically and neurologically challenging as lifting a bigger weight a smaller number of times.
And what of the raw powerlifters at the top of the game? Stan efferding,Dan green? Obese;I think not.
Pete rubish,mark bell, Sam Byrd, Eric lillebridge, Chris hickson-to name a few more.
Ben seath just did a bodybuilding show, I bet he didn't get his quads and hams from extensions and curls
Whoah, bias much? Being strong is a noble goal in itself; it leads to better health and longevity, and benefits the individual and everyone around them along the way. Being pretty on the other hand is just narcissistic. So how do you justify your bias? Personally I could care less about having a 20" arm. As long as that arm can lift a kid or rescue a stranger from a burning building I'm happy with it.
It's quite obvious to me the author doesn't really understand, or is up to date on current pl training methodologies.if you don't really understand the sport of bodybuilding, you really shouldn't comment
Obviously doesn't know the difference between a raw lifter and a lifter in gear trying to get perfect leverage.
This article blows and is outdated. Most raw power lifters understand they will be most competitive in a weight class where they hold the most muscle mass...not the most fat.
Different sports are different.
Stupidest fcking bunch of words I've ever read. I can't even call it an article.
I just lifted in the WPC worlds in Prague, the 'clinically obese' lifters were the minority as far as physiques go.
The days of the fat Powerlifter have been over for quite a few years now. We are in fact putting more emphasis on conditioning now than ever.
Clearly no research was done prior to assembling this piece of shyt...
Great pointFact is anybody with a BMI over 30 is "clinically obese", which would include every single (male) person who's ever set foot on the Olympia stage.
Hmm, I see it differently. I see performance as being a physical phenomenon, not a subjective aesthetic. And lifting a high volume of lighter weights can be a useful training tool, but it will never be as physically and neurologically challenging as lifting a bigger weight a smaller number of times.
that is why you are not a body builder.
the author clearly states the differences between the two sports. posing on stage is not easy. if you are not in the best shape, you are either going to look seriously out of shape (an most likely will look like shiit as well) or are going to pass out from being out of breath.
if you don't really understand the sport of bodybuilding, you really shouldn't comment.
the point of this article is to get those interesting in bodybuilding back on point, as we all get caught up in wanting to be strong and big (set in our own minds).
the training styles are different. this can be argued for days. either you agree or don't. if you do, this article is a wake up call.
if you don't, then you'll most likely bitch about it.
It isn't a, " why powerlifters w/e" article.
Stupidest fcking bunch of words I've ever read. I can't even call it an article.
I just lifted in the WPC worlds in Prague, the 'clinically obese' lifters were the minority as far as physiques go.
The days of the fat Powerlifter have been over for quite a few years now. We are in fact putting more emphasis on conditioning now than ever.
Clearly no research was done prior to assembling this piece of shyt...
No kidding, clearly it's just an off the cuff slam at pl. Fact is anybody with a BMI over 30 is "clinically obese", which would include every single (male) person who's ever set foot on the Olympia stage.
Except that the BMI test clearly footnotes that it isn't accurate for those who have rigourous and regular training of any type. BMI can't be used to measure anyone with any above average level of activity.
But it is used everyday to determine exactly what you are saying it can't be used for.
<----had to get nutritional and exercise counseling from my pcp because my bmi was >30
I've forgotten more about nutrition and training than 99% of clinicians who use bmi in their practice.
Powerlifters goal is to move the maximum amount of poundage regardless of form"
Lmao you fycking srs?
fueledpassion said:Clearly, you haven't performed 65-70% of your 1RM @ 15-25 reps on squats. Do that and you'll likely never make that statement above ever again...
I've ran the cube method by Brandon Lilly (Powerlifter). The program had me do 1 set of 50 on Olympic squats. Do that statement above and you'll never question if a PL'er incorporates volume again...
fueledpassion said:U were the one that made the statement that lower reps higher weight was more demanding than the other and somehow coming back with 1 set of 50 as a point to show the difficulty in heavy weight-lifting isnt ringing a bell. Besides, u'd have to go way below 50% of ur 1RM to pull off 50 reps. That isnt really a bodybuilding style as much as an aerobic/endurance training.
I think I speak for most folks that do regular training of each type that the higher intensity nature of bodybuilding style will tax both the aerobic and anaerobic systems as compared to strength training which dabbles mainly in anaerobic training. Its simply easier to do 3 reps of 90% and rest for 3 minutes than to do 15 reps of 70% and only rest for 90 seconds.
"...bodybuilding is men on a stage in their underwear wearing brown paint showing other men their muscles. It is training for appearance only, and at the contest level requires a degree of vanity, narcissism and self absorption that I find distasteful and odd"
-Mark Rippetoe...
With all due respect, go back and read the first paragraph of that piece of shyt.
It is totally bashing powerlifters...
The clinically obese part, yes. The rest, while most likely true, are generalizations about PL'ers and could have been more tactfully written about except the part about pl being easier that isnt true. There is a staunch of arrogance for sure. Bad write up in regards to being tactful and kind about it but regarding the takeaway, which I think was to train differently, was still helpful imo. Regardless, all the PL'ers have come in here and for every criticism the author had we've now probably gotten two from Pl'ers directed toward bodybuilding to a point that I'm beginning to wonder if the masses of PL'ers have a chip on their shoulder toward us about it...by responding back that same way as the author did...did it make u any better? Just a thought I have as I read through all the lashing out. We're supposed to support each other not hate each other like this. Lets not have this arrogant author ruin the comraderie amongst us.
The fact that this "author's" sample powerlifting routine was a typical, gradual progressive-overload routine, clearly shows he knows next to nothing about how to achieve maximal strength & speed.
The best powerlifter's in the world train maximal strength, maximal speed, conditioning, restoration & technique.
Of course, there are amateur & professional powerlifters who don't know how to train, just like there are amateur & professional bodybuilders who don't know what they're doing either. This "author" is generalizing everybody which is just ignorant.
Great powerlifters may lift maximally 4-6~ times each week, which not only takes an immense physical toll on someone, but an even greater mental & emotional toll, as well. The ability to recover between sets, exercises & workouts like this requires excellent conditioning.
Bottom line: powerlifting & bodybuilding = apples & oranges.
Agreed. On a slightly different note, anyone care to mention a few powerlifting programs I could consider after my cycle? I've never done one and would like to do it for 6-8 weeks...
You could give 531 a try, but ideally you'd want to run it more than 6-8 weeks since it's based on 4 week cycles. If you want to run it for 12 weeks, it'd put 30 lbs on the big three and your military press.
If you need any more info, shoot me a pm and I'll hook you up.
I'm so deep into 531 I have an excel file that plans my whole year out for me...