This article presents a logical fallacy; specifically, it's a loaded question. You can't argue against anything he says here without being labeled an 'exercise nazi'. Even if he's wrong. About, for instance, behind the neck presses being superior to correct presses, or dips being superior to bench press. Correct presses are better than behind the neck presses IMO, because it's possible to load them a lot more effectively, same thing for dips vs. bench press. You might get 10% better activation with those exercises, but that's moot if you can use twice the weight with the right movements.