Beneath_the_Sea
Board Supporter
I've been doing some reading, and have come across posted studies on how Sesamin increases AA as opposed to reducing it. Would X-Factor and Sesamin be a good stack then? Would there be any positive synergy there?
Man, that kinda hurt my feelings. It's true though, Phosphate is an MD, I'm not.Derek_aka_Beast said:I directed him to Phosphate Bond, Molecular Nutrition's new rep. He'd be the one to ask IMO.
To give you a clear answer, I say alternate between cycles of the two.Apowerz6 said:So what do you think Beast? I know sesamin is solid, but to stack? Thoughts?
Aeternitatis said:And saying you'd rather get AA from eggs is somewhat like saying I'd rather get sesamin from sesame seeds. It is POSSIBLE, but not easy to do. At least, not to the extent that is going to harness the powers that are harnessed through supplementation with sesamin and AA.
Reggin said:I do not think that is a fitting analogy.
Egg yolk contains 967 mg of AA per 1/2 pound. Combine that with a loss of approximately 20-30% when cooked and you see that it isn't the best source. The richest sources by far are organ meats.Derek_aka_Beast said:Me either, but I couldn't find a concrete number of how much AA an egg has, so I'm not gonna argue it.
When talking about proper use of X-Factor one must differentiate between muscle specific inflammation and full body inflammation.doggzj said:Personally, I'm not going to be increasing inflammation more then my body does itself. The health benifits of sesamin FAR outway the extra muscle your might make from x-factor, imo.
Aeternitatis said:And no one is claiming that X-Factor is more healthy than sesamin (though I have reason to believe we're gonna find sesamin to not be so great after all), that is why it is used in cycles.
In that case, it seem to me as though we were never meant to consume such large amounts of sesamin. It would be impossible to do naturally.Reggin said:I believe it is 160 mg/egg yolk.
That is about 5.5 egg yolks to get the daily dosage of AA in X-Factor.
Sesamin, on the other hand, is about 1 mg/gram of sesame seeds.
To get a daily dose of sesamin, one would need 1,500,000 grams of sesame seeds, which is more than 3,000 lbs.
As I said, not a fitting analogy.
Sesamin usage is still rather new. It is impossible to consume in such large amounts in any natural setting. Anecdotal evidence and personal experience show it to not be so saintly. I think it will eventually go the way of flax oil. But hey, it's just a hunch.Reggin said:What reason is that? I'd honestly like to know.
By the way, my post above was in response to Derek, and you replied before I posted, so the first line of my post comes off as real smart-ass like. Sorry bout' that.
Aeternitatis said:In that case, it seem to me as though we were never meant to consume such large amounts of sesamin. It would be impossible to do naturally.
Now before everyone gets pissed at that statement, I want to say that I do think sesamin is a good product (although personally I saw nothing from it, the research is positive). I'm just trying to put a little perspective into the scene. To me though, sesamin reminds me of the flax oil craze. It was touted by everyone as the one thing you can't live without... then whoops. It negatively impacts testosterone? It is implicated in prostate cancer?
Again, sesamin has it's uses (flax does as well), but these alliances people have made to it are crazy.
Perhaps.Reggin said:I understand your argument, but that argument can be purported with many supplements.
I.e. antioxidant compounds, Green Tea Extract, syephrine, yohimbine, and plant sterols are all present in extremely small quantities in their natural states, but have their relative benefits when extracted and concentrated to a significant enough level.
Aeternitatis said:When talking about proper use of X-Factor one must differentiate between muscle specific inflammation and full body inflammation.
And no one is claiming that X-Factor is more healthy than sesamin (though I have reason to believe we're gonna find sesamin to not be so great after all), that is why it is used in cycles. But it isn't like stopping your use of sesamin in order to effectively use AA is going to lead to some horrible loss in health.
Another example of your argument is that the health benefits of eating a low calorie diet FAR outweigh the extra muscle you might get from ingesting a large amount of calories. While this is true, who wants to be small and weak for the whole life just to get a few extra years out of it?
Thank you for understanding that I'm not bashing sesamin at all. I do think it is a good product. The research and feedback support it very well.Reggin said:I don't believe he is bashing Sesamin, but just expressing his skepticism, which there is nothing wrong with.
I, on the other hand, do completely disagree with him. I take a completely opposite approach in the sense that I believe Sesamin is even more benefecial for health than we make it out to be. I think that it should be marketed more as a "general health" supplement than a fat loss agent, because it exerts very many positive effects in the body.
Derek_aka_Beast said:I blame the low carbs![]()