Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Al-Qaida Has Nuclear Weapons Inside U.S.

PC1 said:
Thank you for this. I appreciate your honesty here.

This marks some real progress in this discussion.

:)

However I disagree with the idea that Saddam would ever have given up control of Iraq voluntarily. Remember that he already was isolated as a result of the embargo. And despite his unpopularity among most Iraqis, and his distrust among most arab countries, he maintained his grip on power and control of the country's resources. If covert actions were unsuccessful, and the embargo was only hurting Iraqi citizens while Saddam didn't seem to give a damn, and that Saddam was in at least some ways subverting the embargo with France and Russia, I don't know what else anyone could do to bring more pressure against him? What else could have been done?

Insofar as failures of intelligence go and the premise(s) by which the US invaded Iraq, I think the one thing anyone has to admire is the freedom of the press here in the US (and in England). Look at the level of public scrutiny the two governments are now receiving as a result of the invasion. Even if in the end you feel the war was unjustified or not worth the cost in lives and dollars, we would be hard pressed to justify an invasion of Iran or North Korea right now, just as examples, without being in possession of air-tight iron-clad intelligence that they posed a credible threat.


Hiphop, I agree with PC1 we have a breakthrough :thumbsup: :drunk:. Thank you for your frank answer to the question.

To bad that you still contracdict yourself
WMD have gone that he never had

We know he had WMD because he used them on the Kurds and Iranians. Invalid Link Removed
via Invalid Link Removed
The ISG’s search for significant stockpiles of WMD has so far come up empty. It may be that there are no large stockpiles, as Dr. Kay has stated. But from my perspective in the MOST, this lack of a positive finding may also be the result of unfocused and uncoordinated ISG search operations. It is entirely possible that the much sought-after WMD stockpiles may be literally right under the feet of coalition forces, and until a properly coordinated search effort is completed, no firm conclusions about their presence or absence can be reached. The case remains open.

In his recent testimony, Dr. Kay pronounced that there are no large stockpiles of WMD. This is a pretty bold assertion considering that actual surveys of sites we were familiar with were haphazard and uncoordinated. Also, according to his own interim report published in October of 2003, the ISG had not even searched 120 of the 130 known ammo storage points, much less any underground sites. In addition to these known sites, “neighborhood� arms caches are discovered all the time in Iraq. It is entirely possible that WMD stockpiles were moved out of Iraq, or that they were dispersed in Baghdad neighborhoods and throughout Iraq. All of this may even have been accomplished while the unfocused search operations were ongoing.

How fast can you find something the size of a refrigerator in an area about the same size as texas? Even somehting a fraction of that size could bring unthinkable destruction and death to a large sized city. You also have to look at what you are defining as an immenent threat. Are we talking total descruction of the US, vis a vis full scale nuclear assault by the ussr? Hell no, never happen. Are we talking about some idoit releasing Sarin gas in a subway killing thousands and crippling the world economy. You bet.


hiphop said:
1.what right do the US have to be going around and imposing there values on other countries ?
2.who is to blame for this disterous performance about WMD and immenent threat
3.what kind of safe guards have been put in place to prevent this dangerous situation happening again.

1. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. This is a common argument, and I say you ARE 100% COMPLETELY RIGHT. I want the US our of the UN and NATO, I don't want millitary bases in Europe where my tax money bolsters the failing economy of an ungrateful population. I don't care that Sub-saharan africans are starving to death because local governments and warlords don't care about THEIR own people. I don't care that ME countries have some of the worst standards of living on the planet even though they sit on the richest natural resource supply around. I don't care that the chechens want to be a free islamic state not under russian control. I don't give a **** what happens in the balkins. You are right, the world as a whole needs to take responsibility for thier own actions and thier own problems.

But when friends and family are killed under the auspices of fanatical islam, then it becomes our problem. Would we have gone into iraq if there had been no 911, probably not. Do I think Iraq should have been next on the list if there were no WMD, I am not a military planner and am not privelege to all of the classified information to make that decision. IMO, there are other countries (Iran, North Korea) that are a far bigger mess and threat as far as wmd capablities are concerned.

The best we can hope for ( and there is tons of hope if you read some of the new iraqi blogs Invalid Link Removed) is to have helped stabalize the region (with no help from our Nato allies, just like the balkins where they turn a blind eye to genocide in their own backyard), give the iraqies a taste of what it is like to be in charge of their own destiny, and hope that it is contageous in the region.

2. Saddam bears full responsiblity for not complying with resolution 1441.

3. When this is the language, posturing, and media coming out of a religeon. I don't see why America has to appoliogize for any action or bear sole responsibility for the problems in the region. Clean up your own backyard.

Invalid Link Removed

Ben Laden : they held back your fools and interdict on them ..The sheikh puts the final touches before the coming battle

Two speeches to the sheikh Osama that the masses media neglected totally
A single of the nations the Islamic and fighting in Iraq
And this I will not stop at it a lot
Because it is included under the incitement that the sheikh Osama persisted in most his last messages

As for the second message
Then she was a clear political message
The sheikh Osama excuses himself in front of Allah and in front of the world
The sheikh Osama actually has knotted a jihad brigade major general so that it carries out strong battle in the back lines to the enemy
And this word she is nothing but an establishment of the pilgrimage
Until no is to the people a pretext they blame by it the sheikh when the event falls

And from the clear
Located on the point of the execution
And its prevention appears impossible

Or what the sheikh Osama spoke with this severe confidence
And he reminded them of what he said the day of Afghanistan hitting and she is the more famous sentence of it since it said
I swear by the great Allah who raised the sky without mayors, that America will not dream and no who lives in America with the security before we live it located in Palestine land and before it yields all unbelieving armies from Mohammad 's land peace be upon him

Since from the folds of its speaking the severe confidence appears that there is a matter has not being issued
And the secrecy of what may consider the minutes and the seconds Llithkhan is in the enemy

And the good reader to the juveniles
He knows that the Al-Qaeda will give with power in America and with no mercy
Because the Americans have done what raised the anger of the Muslims in the whole world it
And they used the strongest killing weapons in the killing of the free unarmed Muslims

And we do not forget that the eleventh events from September came answering to hitting an Afghanistan in 1998
And about 5 of the militants were killed !!!!
5 of the militants she drove Mohammad Ata 's brigade and Albraa and Al-Qaqaa and the surgeon that he overthrows the age idiots !!!
Then so what do you think of by these thousands that executed dead in Afghanistan and Iraq !!!

The confirmation of the sheikh that they count number of the dead from the Muslims
He confirms by what does not leave a field for the doubt that the coming hitting will be very painful
And the running will drive in it an expensive bill a price for its injustice and its pursuit the corruption in earth

Does she drop the Romans country with this hitting ØŸ
I do not think at all
But I think that the coming Aldria will be effective to the extent of that the Americans incite to the change of their politics totally in the region, and perhaps an open drawing to their forces from Iraq and Afghanistan is !!!
And it not the end is meant to the military America
But it will be the end to America the greatest, and the American century will end, so that powers start like Russia and France and Germany and China and Japan in the emergence on the arena !!
And this strong will represent an eastern leader from China and Russia, and a western leader from Germany and France, and will be the severe fear and the lining runner of the new pole that will appear by a force of the yard, and he is the jihad groups .

I say it confidently : the coming hitting - if the divine decree of it the success - then the militants will turn to a power that gives for it thousand consideration, and for them a Foreign Minister will be ordering then he is obeyed !!
And the sheikh Osama will drive the world all how he wants
And he will suffice the direction of a threat through the message of its sounds so that the enemies bodies tremble and comply with the man demands
Or then the stick is present
And there will be not island
He will mention the sheikh Osama knowledgeable of his stick God willing

The Americans understand that the rule will not miss the chance of the American elections for the pressure on the American people for the compliance with the execution of their demands
And the Al-Qaeda became possessing the initiative !!!! With the recognition of the Americans themselves !!
And he suffices
All today wait for what the Islam lion will do Osama is !!!

The coming days will be very hot
And she will witness the fall of the thrones of the Arab tyrants after the failure of their master in the White House
And if the hitting was delayed for some time
Then I do not think the reason that will be the non readiness
But - and Allah is more knowledgeable -, the Al-Qaeda wants that it exhausts the nerves of their enemy that his stock exchange collapse with the doing of this psychological war !!!
And I believe that the militants today perceive well
How and when they are hit
And from where the shoulder is eaten

And I think - and Allah is more knowledgeable - that the Al-Qaeda studies also the American reaction accurately on its coming hitting
And securing places alternative to the rules that their registration and their giving will take place as a reaction to the American enemy
And I am not excluded
There is a coordination it will be between the militants in Iraq and the fighting in America
Because the coming hitting will weaken from the intention of America men in Iraq
And have Tdfam for throwing the weapon
And the surrender to the resistance a price for the preservation of their life !!!

Oh Allah repay
Oh Allah repay
Oh Allah repay

man that should be a top 40 hit :blink:
 
Last edited:
yeah saddam had someone iinject them selves with ebola thats the immenet threat the US were facing and thats why they went to war you are only foolin yourself vanilla and makin yourself look stupid when you make statements like this
Go back and read what I said. You were assuming a WMD was something that had to be launched from another country which it is not. I simply pointed out what WMDs are. I did not say that Sadam injected someone with Ebola but that it would be classified as a WMD.
WE WOULD NOT BE IN IRAQ IF THE UN DID IT'S JOB IN THE FIRST PLACE.

they also wouldnt be in iraq of america was nt so egocentric
That great but you keep igoring my point. The UN did not enforce it's own resolutions and if it did we would not be in Iraq. That answers many of you questions you asked. You can't say anything to refute this so you ignore it.
i repeat them because no one awners them.
They have been answered several times.
richard clarek is a counter terrorism expert not a WMD expert, im not getting involved in stupid arguments about where saddams WMD have gone that he never had. the bottom line is these invisible WMD are going to have gone to whichever country is next on the US hitlist.
It's a stupid argument because it makes you look bad. You are the one who brought him into this not me. So I guess you pick and choose the points you like and ignore the others? So if Clark says some thing you agree with than it's true but if you don't like it or in this case didn't know about it than he doesn't know what he is talking about? There is some solid logic hiphop.
 
hiphop said:
that still doesnt address the main problem, theroteically america could take over the world on pre-emption. we have laws and organisations for dealing with problems to prevent war and to prevent chaos and countries taking over other countries under false pretenses.

Saddam was fully responsible for PROVING that he had destroyed his weapons. Not just saying, oh yeah I got rid of the sain, vx, centirfuges, and yellow cake after I kicked the inspectors out, come back in and see if you can't find them.

[qutoe]
1.Yet we didnt see this kind of questioning of the iraq intellegence why ??
2.we saw dodgy claims and spin to the verge of a lie which is usually avoided by politians.
3.i have seen people loose their job for far less than this, so who is to blame for these failiures and why are they still being employed after such a horrendous mistake?
4.what kind of safe guards have been put in place to prevent these kind of disasterous intellgence failiures from happening again ??

1. We did, you can only get so much information out of a totalitarian regime. I am having trouble finding the links, give me a while - but I have some documenation showing the even our 'allies' france, germany, russia had come to the same conclusion. They just weren't willing participant because of the UN Oil for Food scandle.

2. :rofl: Please tell me that you didn't just say that policticians don't lie.

3. You are 100% right, the intelligence community in this county needs to be dismantled and rebuilt. Because this sounds fishy as hell
Invalid Link Removed
via Invalid Link Removed
Under this system, thousands of agents were recruited abroad neither for their intelligence-reporting potential nor their operational utility. They were put on the books--case officers often referred to the sport as "collecting scalps"--because that is how CIAoperatives earned promotion. With some exceptions--extraordinary handling of foreign agents could win you bonus points--the "head count" was the way to professional success. For most case officers, the Cold War was a backdrop for the constant search for an easy "developmental," somebody who could be quickly turned into a "recruitment" for the annual performance report.
 
3. You are 100% right, the intelligence community in this county needs to be dismantled and rebuilt. Because this sounds fishy as hell
Invalid Link Removed
via Invalid Link Removed
I'll agree with that. It's one of the first things we should have done after 9-11.
 
1.what right do the US have to be going around and imposing there values on other countries ?
1. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. This is a common argument, and I say you ARE 100% COMPLETELY RIGHT. I want the US our of the UN and NATO, I don't want millitary bases in Europe where my tax money bolsters the failing economy of an ungrateful population. I don't care that Sub-saharan africans are starving to death because local governments and warlords don't care about THEIR own people. I don't care that ME countries have some of the worst standards of living on the planet even though they sit on the richest natural resource supply around. I don't care that the chechens want to be a free islamic state not under russian control. I don't give a **** what happens in the balkins. You are right, the world as a whole needs to take responsibility for thier own actions and thier own problems.

But when friends and family are killed under the auspices of fanatical islam, then it becomes our problem. Would we have gone into iraq if there had been no 911, probably not. Do I think Iraq should have been next on the list if there were no WMD, I am not a military planner and am not privelege to all of the classified information to make that decision. IMO, there are other countries (Iran, North Korea) that are a far bigger mess and threat as far as wmd capablities are concerned.

The best we can hope for ( and there is tons of hope if you read some of the new iraqi blogs Invalid Link Removed) is to have helped stabalize the region (with no help from our Nato allies, just like the balkins where they turn a blind eye to genocide in their own backyard), give the iraqies a taste of what it is like to be in charge of their own destiny, and hope that it is contageous in the region.
??? you still didnt awnser the question what right does america have to go around and impose its values on other countries ??

2. Saddam bears full responsiblity for not complying with resolution 1441
you still didnt awsner this question maybe i shoudl rephrase it and you might understand it better.
the intellegence was wrong beyond comprehension who is to blame ?

3.what kind of safe guards have been put in place to prevent this dangerous situation happening again.
i guess is hould rephrase this one too
the intellegence was disasterously wrong which lead to, billions of dollars,thousands of lives, americans lives lost what kind of safeguards have been put in place to prevent this kind of disaster from ever happening again.

in reply to the waffle above the UN is there to maintain peace not to intiate war and about richard clarke i said he was one of many top security officials from around the world that the white house ignored reagrding terrorism nothing to do with WMD
 
hiphop said:
??? you still didnt awnser the question what right does america have to go around and impose its values on other countries ??
*** Edit *** I don't feel like beating this dead horse anymore.

hiphop said:
you still didnt awsner this question maybe i shoudl rephrase it and you might understand it better.
the intellegence was wrong beyond comprehension who is to blame ?

*** Edit *** I don't feel like beating this dead horse anymore.

hiphop said:
1. the intellegence was wrong beyond comprehension
and
2. intellegence was disasterously wrong

*** Edit *** I don't feel like beating this dead horse anymore.

hiphop said:
and about richard clarke i said he was one of many top security officials from around the world that the white house ignored reagrding terrorism nothing to do with WMD

****Edit, was gonna delete but maybe somebody will read the link****
And of coarse you'll ignore this and just cut and paste the last 4 questions again.

Oh look, dirty bombs
Oh but the UN instpectors and Hans Blix said he destroyed it all :frustrate
Invalid Link Removed
Hmmm, mustard gas
Invalid Link Removed

Doesn't sound like we ignored the russian?
Invalid Link Removed

Russian President Vladimir Putin Says Russia Gave United States Intel on Iraq
Date Posted: June 19, 2004

ASTANA, Kazakhstan - Russian President Vladimir Putin said Friday his government warned Washington that Saddam Hussein's regime was preparing attacks in the United States and its interests abroad-- an assertion that appears to bolster President Bush's contention that Iraq was a threat.

Putin emphasized that the intelligence didn't cause Russia to waver from its firm opposition to the U.S.-led war last year, but his statement was the second this month in which he has offered at least some support for Bush on Iraq.

"After Sept. 11, 2001, and before the start of the military operation in Iraq, the Russian special services ... received information that officials from Saddam's regime were preparing terrorist attacks in the United States and outside it against the U.S. military and other interests," Putin said.

"Despite that information ... Russia's position on Iraq remains unchanged," he said in the Kazakh capital, Astana, after regional economic and security summits. He said Russia didn't have any information that Saddam's regime had actually been behind any terrorist acts.

"It's one thing to have information that Saddam's regime is preparing terrorist attacks, (but) we didn't have information that it was involved in any known terrorist attacks," he said. ....

*** EDIT ****
This thread has proven to be a waste of someones server space.
 
Last edited:
hiphop said:
1.Yet we didnt see this kind of questioning of the iraq intellegence why ??
2.we saw dodgy claims and spin to the verge of a lie which is usually avoided by politians.
3.i have seen people loose their job for far less than this, so who is to blame for these failiures and why are they still being employed after such a horrendous mistake?
4.what kind of safe guards have been put in place to prevent these kind of disasterous intellgence failiures from happening again ??

Just my two cents on these, not that I'm necessarily right...........

1. There was more to the decision to invade, than just the threat from WMD. Bush indicated Saddam posed "a growing and gathering threat", not an emminent danger. It's an important distinction. The intelligence was, again my words here, not our governments, "suggestive" rather than conclusive. We had multiple accounts from various sources that Saddam was trying to reconstitute his aresenal and by some accounts he had. AND remember that post 9-11, Bush, and I think most Americans, felt we were caught flat footed with al-Qaeda's attack. Bush successfully laid out a game plan that Saddam was part of the overall war on terror. He was afterall, a tyrant and viewed by most middle eastern countries as a menace and a threat. Put it all together, in hindsight, it was fairly easy to gain public support, even if you disagree with it's merit.

2. I'm not sure what you mean here. There's an old saying in this country, it's easy to tell any time a politician is lying........ their lips are moving. ;)

3. A valid point. George Tenant has resigned as head of the CIA, and the CIA seems at this point anyway, to bear the primary responsibility for both underestimating al Qaeda and for the shortcomings leading up to the Iraq invasion. I would also point out at this point, that initial reports are indicating that the Bush administration did not try to influence the intelligence or shape it to support a preconceived doctrine or policy.

4. Well, it appears we've taken the first step, which involves a fairly intense and public scrutiny of our shortcomings. One can't expect this is going to happen overnight, but it is in the news just about every day. The 9/11 commission has made some suggestions. Many here are saying though that not much substantive change is going to occur until after the November elections. That strikes many people here as being irresponsible. That's true, but on the other hand, it's also very unlikely that during the same time the US would be taking on any new conflicts, such as North Korea or Iran.

Now, being that I've at least attempted to answer your questions, I would enjoy knowing from you what additional measures you feel the US should have taken to bring more pressure to bear on Saddam Hussein, that possibly would have caused him to give up his throne and leave Iraq?

Thank you.

;)
 
in reply to the waffle above the UN is there to maintain peace not to intiate war and about richard clarke i said he was one of many top security officials from around the world that the white house ignored reagrding terrorism nothing to do with WMD
The only person who is waffling is you. The bottom line is Sadam was in violation of the UN resolutions for years. The UN did nothing about it and was getting paid off. Even though you don't like it they are facts. You can keep trying to side step it and ignore it but they are facts.
the UN is there to maintain peace not to intiate war
That is the most asinine point you have made yet. How many places did the UN go into in the 1990s? Was Somalia in violation of UN resolutions for years? NO!! Yet they supported that war.
Sadam kicked inspectors out and would play games with them when they were allowed to look for weapons. It was clear that he was calling the shots not the UN. That fact coupled with the oil for food scandal proves what an inept, corrupt, bureaucratic, pointless organization that the UN is. The bottom line is had the UN held Sadam to the resolutions and enforced them we would not be in Iraq today.
richard clarke i said he was one of many top security officials from around the world that the white house ignored reagrding terrorism nothing to do with WMD
Yes but the point is you presented Richard Clark as evidence against the Bush administration. When it was pointed out that Richard Clark said that the WMDs were moved to Syria you didn't like this and dismissed it. You can't cherry pick what points you like and don't like. If Clark is credible against the Bush administration his views are credible on WMDs in Iraq. You don't think that the United States Terrorism Czar would be concerned or have information about WMDs in Iraq ? What you essentially have said was that Clarke is credible when he is criticizing the Bush administration but doesn't know what he is talking about with WMDs in Iraq. On top of that your logic implies that the Terrorism Czar of the United States would be out of the loop when it comes to another country having WMDs. Do you see a problem with that logic chain?
You won't answer any questions so I am guessing here.......... but it looks like you are thinking of WMDs in terms of another country launching a rocket at us. The reality is the United States needs to be more concerned about WMDs on a much smaller scale. We are more in danger of a suite case nuke or a biological weapon such as Anthrax or small pocks. This is a different kind of war than we are accustomed to. It is not like the Cold War when we knew where are enemies were located for the most part. Now we need to worried about small cells or bands of terrorist walking over the Mexican border with a few glowing suite cases or a dozen or so highly contagious aerosol cans of a biological weapon. After that all they need to do is take a tour of the Major tourists sites of Washington or visit a few malls and there will be massive amounts of casualties.
 
Too bad it wont happen until there is another one
I have a feeling the next one is going to be a hell of allot worse and it's going to be coming from the boarder. Did you guys read that article some posted a few days ago about the 10 or so middle eastern guys on a plane? It was scary it proved we still are not safe flying.


Doesn't sound like we ignored the russian?
Invalid Link Removed
We know why Putin didn't suport us.
 
Now, being that I've at least attempted to answer your questions, I would enjoy knowing from you what additional measures you feel the US should have taken to bring more pressure to bear on Saddam Hussein, that possibly would have caused him to give up his throne and leave Iraq?
well the war was based on saddam being an immenent threat with WMD which we now know he wasnt and that , that assumption was wrong.

but if we had to get rid of him these are some things that i think would have helped to avoid war
1.support legitime forces of resistance to saddam and encourage them to rise up over saddam.
2.gather support for these operations from the rest of the world and gain support from the arab league, UN, EU etc then work together to pressure him.
3.isolate saddam from even its neighbours
4.or even state assination i know its illegal and slightly extreme but anything has to be better than war.
 
hiphop said:
well the war was based on saddam being an immenent threat with WMD which we now know he wasnt and that , that assumption was wrong.

but if we had to get rid of him these are some things that i think would have helped to avoid war
1.support legitime forces of resistance to saddam and encourage them to rise up over saddam.
2.gather support for these operations from the rest of the world and gain support from the arab league, UN, EU etc then work together to pressure him.
3.isolate saddam from even its neighbours
4.or even state assination i know its illegal and slightly extreme but anything has to be better than war.

WMD and immenent threat have not been provent wrong, we have all provided you with references to the contrary. Just because YOU want to ignore the facts, that doesn't make them wrong.

1. The last time a 'letigatmate' native iraq force stood up to him he used his WMD against them
2. + 3. You mean gather support from the same people he was bribing with the oil-for-food scandle. Yeah that is going to happen. He was under sanctions for a decade and did not comply - you just want more sanctions. You mean isoloate him even more from the world community then he was supposed to have been. Except the contries with the veto UN power were increasing their GDP doing business with him.
4. This statement is f'd up for so many reasons that I will not even dignify it with an answer.
 
VanillaGorilla said:
I have a feeling the next one is going to be a hell of allot worse and it's going to be coming from the boarder. Did you guys read that article some posted a few days ago about the 10 or so middle eastern guys on a plane? It was scary it proved we still are not safe flying.

Check these two out
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Have you ever heard of a group called Ranch Rescue?

We know why Putin didn't suport us.
Are you taking about 'The final phase'?
 
Jeff said:
Check these two out
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

It is SO exhasperating to read stories like these. It's one thing to be a free and open society insofar as legitimate immigration.

But it just seems criminally negligent that with the resources the US has, that groups of dozens, or even more are able to sneak in without our being aware of it.
 
It is SO exhasperating to read stories like these. It's one thing to be a free and open society insofar as legitimate immigration.

But it just seems criminally negligent that with the resources the US has, that groups of dozens, or even more are able to sneak in without our being aware of it.
It is criminally negligent.3000 people died on 9-11.Shutting down the boarder and restructuring the INS should have been one of the first things we did. If a local police officer picks up people they suspect of being illegal immigrants, they can't do anything about it. They have to let them go. We are in big trouble.
 
VanillaGorilla said:
Damn those story were scary. No never heard of them. What do they do?

ranchrescue.com.

Ranch Rescue is a volunteer network composed of people who believe that when government fails or refuses to act, individual Citizens are obligated to act on their own. Our membership works to preserve and protect the individual private property rights of all our nation's Citizens, regardless of race, color, creed, or religion.
Please read a description of our founding principles.
We are not a single entity, but a network of many independent state chapters, landowner hosts, and individual volunteers and allies.
 
PC1 said:
It is SO exhasperating to read stories like these. It's one thing to be a free and open society insofar as legitimate immigration.

But it just seems criminally negligent that with the resources the US has, that groups of dozens, or even more are able to sneak in without our being aware of it.

Both of my parents came to this country 'legaly' following WWII from Europe. My mother said that it took almost 2 years for them to obtain a visa and they were almost denide access because my grandfather failed to mention he had a traffic accident that he was sited for 10 years prior to them applying. Times change I guess :think:

I am with you though, it is because America is a free/melting pot society that makes the country the greatest on the planet.
 
Here's another one for our buddy hiphop, I think his question was something to the effect - "Who should pay to have the wall removed?". How about the people who made millions on it.

Palestinians 'made millions' selling cheap cement for barrier they bitterly oppose.
Invalid Link Removed
Palestinian businessmen have made millions of pounds supplying cement for Israel's "security barrier" in the full knowledge of Yasser Arafat, the Palestinian leader and one of the wall's most vocal critics.

Now we know how Arafat's wife can afford a $2 million apartment in downtown paris.
 
Nukes won't be used in retaliation unless solid evidence of direct ties to and funding from a foreign nation are established, and even then they most likely wouldn't be used.
I know this is a bit late but...
... that statement is simply not true. One of the main points of the with-us-or-against-us phrase was to put Iran, Syria, and others on notice. A nuclear attack from terrorists supported by a state will be considered an attack from the state itself. It's probably one of the reasons Pakistan changed its tune (at least superficially).
 
I know this is a bit late but...
... that statement is simply not true. One of the main points of the with-us-or-against-us phrase was to put Iran, Syria, and others on notice. A nuclear attack from terrorists supported by a state will be considered an attack from the state itself. It's probably one of the reasons Pakistan changed its tune (at least superficially).
We wouldn't have a choice. We would have to hit some one. The first reason being there would be a hell of allot public out rage to act. Also it's the equivalent of being in a fight and some one punches you. If you don't do something they are going to punch you again. If you have to wait for someone's permission to hit them back your going to get hit more times than you would want before you could fight back.
 
CDB said:
Nukes won't be used in retaliation unless solid evidence of direct ties to and funding from a foreign nation are established, and even then they most likely wouldn't be used.
Don't be so sure..lack of proof never stopped us before.
I don't doubt Al Q has assets in this country...but the nuclear option may be the biggest risk for them to execute. Biological agents are not as effective as many people belive, but "fact" they have that capability..easier to execute and less likely to result in direct retaliation. The psychological effect would be devastating as well. Many of these people are fanatical or wacko if you prefer, but at the top of these cadres the is shrewd planning .Believe me, they are not all "camel jockeys". I am more worried about a fringe group doing this..besides don't assume US territory would be the only target of consideration.
 
Back
Top