B5150
Legend
I want to throw this one out there for some discussion.
In the case of this discussion the estrogen sensitivity being discussed is estrogen bloat not gyno. The sensitivity is not really moon pie bloat but rather an increased propensity to acrue fat around the midsection when eating in surplus, even slightly.
We know that estrogen and adipose tissue/cells have a symbiotic relationship. We know that increased or elevated estrogen contributes to increased adipose tissue.
We know that there is a some who believe that reducing estrogen created by exogenous testosterone hinders gains. I have heard it said that by doing this a bulker would become a lean mass gaining cycle (which btw is not a bad thing for someone who gets over fat too easily)
We know that the use of an AI (arimidex) can aggresively reduce estrogen and compromise cholesterol. Used sparingly it can be very effective at managing estrogenic bloat.
So we know that reducing (too low) estrogen can hinder gains. But what we also know and sometimes forget is that DHT is an alternate method to control estrogen. Here is a quote by someone credible just to support my theory:
I know that in my research I uncovered many of my fellow members as well as some veterans who have dabbled in some discussion or variation of this topic.
Please discuss...
In the case of this discussion the estrogen sensitivity being discussed is estrogen bloat not gyno. The sensitivity is not really moon pie bloat but rather an increased propensity to acrue fat around the midsection when eating in surplus, even slightly.
We know that estrogen and adipose tissue/cells have a symbiotic relationship. We know that increased or elevated estrogen contributes to increased adipose tissue.
We know that there is a some who believe that reducing estrogen created by exogenous testosterone hinders gains. I have heard it said that by doing this a bulker would become a lean mass gaining cycle (which btw is not a bad thing for someone who gets over fat too easily)
We know that the use of an AI (arimidex) can aggresively reduce estrogen and compromise cholesterol. Used sparingly it can be very effective at managing estrogenic bloat.
So we know that reducing (too low) estrogen can hinder gains. But what we also know and sometimes forget is that DHT is an alternate method to control estrogen. Here is a quote by someone credible just to support my theory:
Suppose you used M-DHT, M5AA or 3-Alpha as an alternative to an AI to control the excess estrogen. You would still be able to yield its anabolic properties and reap the androgenic properties (for those who enjoy them) of a true DHT or its derivative.Designer Supps said:You could go with 3 alpha powder in a trans solution and rub it right on where you want. M5aa would also help to lower overall E.
Actually DHT will be even better for the sex drive, you want to control E not totaly destroy it. The real reason it can hurt gains is GH needs it to be present in the liver for a better igf1 conversion. if e is to low now igf1.
Invalid Link Removed
I know that in my research I uncovered many of my fellow members as well as some veterans who have dabbled in some discussion or variation of this topic.
Please discuss...