Guest viewing is limited

5 Weeks On And Have Dead D**k

JoeBrooklyn said:
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Ok, this is a semi-serious question I guess...do you envision some scenario in your mind where the military/police or some other nefarious government agency (helicopters overhead, mirrored sunglasses, dogs barking) is going door-to-door with a clipboard telling people to surrender their firearms?? Do the people that refuse get shot on sight?? Are you the hero that grabs his AR-15 from his closet and escapes into the mountains, kinda like Red Dawn (the 80's version with Patrick Swayze and C. Thomas Howell)

I'm not trying to be rude, but the mentality that "the govt. is going to take my guns" is kinda absurd...besides being logistically impossible everyone knows that "the people rising up in revolution against the tyrannical govt." is some hillbilly fallacy. Nobody will rise up because we might miss Jersey Shore, we have to get the kids to soccer, we don't want to ruin our nice clothes, the new iPhone is coming out and we are going to Golden Corral for dinner. As Rodja rightly pointed out we have first-world problems to deal with, no true tyranny, no true oppression. I hate politics on these forums but I just find this mentality very interesting.
 
Turbo6GN said:
Ok, this is a semi-serious question I guess...do you envision some scenario in your mind where the military/police or some other nefarious government agency (helicopters overhead, mirrored sunglasses, dogs barking) is going door-to-door with a clipboard telling people to surrender their firearms?? Do the people that refuse get shot on sight?? Are you the hero that grabs his AR-15 from his closet and escapes into the mountains, kinda like Red Dawn (the 80's version with Patrick Swayze and C. Thomas Howell)

I'm not trying to be rude, but the mentality that "the govt. is going to take my guns" is kinda absurd...besides being logistically impossible everyone knows that "the people rising up in revolution against the tyrannical govt." is some hillbilly fallacy. Nobody will rise up because we might miss Jersey Shore, we have to get the kids to soccer, we don't want to ruin our nice clothes, the new iPhone is coming out and we are going to Golden Corral for dinner. As Rodja rightly pointed out we have first-world problems to deal with, no true tyranny, no true oppression. I hate politics on these forums but I just find this mentality very interesting.
Click to expand...

I think you miss the point. No true oppression or tyranny is occurring now. Are there unjust or perhaps unnecessary restrictions on liberty? Absolutely.

The point made about a tyrannical government is a hypothetical for the future in case a situation like Hitler ever materialized in America which is what many of the founding fathers wrote about (not disarming the populace in case of a tyrannical government in the future).

And a full scale disarming or prohibition of firearms is incredibly unlikely, but the fact that Hitler did just that, legally, in Germany is food for thought.
 
ONtop888 said:
I think you miss the point. No true oppression or tyranny is occurring now. Are there unjust or perhaps unnecessary restrictions on liberty? Absolutely.

The point made about a tyrannical government is a hypothetical for the future in case a situation like Hitler ever materialized in America which is what many of the founding fathers wrote about (not disarming the populace in case of a tyrannical government in the future).

And a full scale disarming or prohibition of firearms is incredibly unlikely, but the fact that Hitler did just that, legally, in Germany is food for thought.
Click to expand...

Could not have said it better myself.
 
Turbo6GN said:
Ok, this is a semi-serious question I guess...do you envision some scenario in your mind where the military/police or some other nefarious government agency (helicopters overhead, mirrored sunglasses, dogs barking) is going door-to-door with a clipboard telling people to surrender their firearms?? Do the people that refuse get shot on sight?? Are you the hero that grabs his AR-15 from his closet and escapes into the mountains, kinda like Red Dawn (the 80's version with Patrick Swayze and C. Thomas Howell)

I'm not trying to be rude, but the mentality that "the govt. is going to take my guns" is kinda absurd...besides being logistically impossible everyone knows that "the people rising up in revolution against the tyrannical govt." is some hillbilly fallacy. Nobody will rise up because we might miss Jersey Shore, we have to get the kids to soccer, we don't want to ruin our nice clothes, the new iPhone is coming out and we are going to Golden Corral for dinner. As Rodja rightly pointed out we have first-world problems to deal with, no true tyranny, no true oppression. I hate politics on these forums but I just find this mentality very interesting.
Click to expand...

There is no true tyranny in who's eyes? There are many different levels of tyranny and that's why I used the term "soft tyranny" what it means is that we now live in a country where in some states, honest citizens cannot own even a pistol. All this straw man arguements about "assault weapons" (whatever they are) is just that. A 17 year old girl threatened with arrest if she mentions Jesus in a graduation speech? Fines if we fail to buy health insurance. No one is being imprisoned, no one is being executed for their political or religious beliefs, hence the term "soft".
Further; this argument that some people make that because things are worse in other countries it's ok for them to get half as bad here is ridiculous. My parents are from Italy and all the mistakes the Europeans have been making we are now making them here. I dont want to wait until things get like Pakistan to finally say enough is enough, by that time it's too late. It's like saying I'm not as fat as my neighbor so it's ok to get chubby.
 
I go to work out come back and were still on anabolic politics. Who's gonna roid rage out first and hulk smash their monitor.
 
ONtop888 said:
I think you miss the point. No true oppression or tyranny is occurring now. Are there unjust or perhaps unnecessary restrictions on liberty? Absolutely.

The point made about a tyrannical government is a hypothetical for the future in case a situation like Hitler ever materialized in America which is what many of the founding fathers wrote about (not disarming the populace in case of a tyrannical government in the future).

And a full scale disarming or prohibition of firearms is incredibly unlikely, but the fact that Hitler did just that, legally, in Germany is food for thought.
Click to expand...

OK, fair enough, I can appreciate that answer but I guess I just don't understand the whole "in case of a tyrannical government" argument. The world in which your founding fathers lived and formed their ideals is a drastically different one then the one we find ourselves in now.
 
Turbo6GN said:
OK, fair enough, I can appreciate that answer but I guess I just don't understand the whole "in case of a tyrannical government" argument. The world in which your founding fathers lived and formed their ideals is a drastically different one then the one we find ourselves in now.
Click to expand...

Is it really that different? In every age there are tyrannical governments and dictators that oppress their people. The details in approaches to the problems may and probably should vary from the Founders, but the fundamentals are indelible.

I would think that the modern examples of Hitler, Stalin, Mubarak (Egypt), Assad, Saddam, Khomeini (Iran), Musselini (Italy), and so on and so forth would be convincing enough to demonstrate why the threat is always there for an oppressive government that can not be peacefully talked down.

It would be naive to think that this could never happen to America, especially when most of our citizens are tuned out of reality with Jersey Shore and NBA.
 
Turbo6GN said:
OK, fair enough, I can appreciate that answer but I guess I just don't understand the whole "in case of a tyrannical government" argument. The world in which your founding fathers lived and formed their ideals is a drastically different one then the one we find ourselves in now.
Click to expand...

Turbo6GN,
I'm not trying to be an ass but go and do some research on the things the founding fathers were pissed about, hardly anything to start a revolution over and we have moved way passed those things. And if I'm not mistaken Hitler and Stalin were in the 20th century not the 18th.
 
ONtop888 said:
Is it really that different? In every age there are tyrannical governments and dictators that oppress their people. The details in approaches to the problems may and probably should vary from the Founders, but the fundamentals are indelible.

I would think that the modern examples of Hitler, Stalin, Mubarak (Egypt), Assad, Saddam, Khomeini (Iran), Musselini (Italy), and so on and so forth would be convincing enough to demonstrate why the threat is always there for an oppressive government that can not be peacefully talked down.

It would be naive to think that this could never happen to America, especially when most of our citizens are tuned out of reality with Jersey Shore and NBA.
Click to expand...

You are the man!!
 
Turbo6GN said:
Ok, this is a semi-serious question I guess...do you envision some scenario in your mind where the military/police or some other nefarious government agency (helicopters overhead, mirrored sunglasses, dogs barking) is going door-to-door with a clipboard telling people to surrender their firearms?? Do the people that refuse get shot on sight?? Are you the hero that grabs his AR-15 from his closet and escapes into the mountains, kinda like Red Dawn (the 80's version with Patrick Swayze and C. Thomas Howell)

I'm not trying to be rude, but the mentality that "the govt. is going to take my guns" is kinda absurd...besides being logistically impossible everyone knows that "the people rising up in revolution against the tyrannical govt." is some hillbilly fallacy. Nobody will rise up because we might miss Jersey Shore, we have to get the kids to soccer, we don't want to ruin our nice clothes, the new iPhone is coming out and we are going to Golden Corral for dinner. As Rodja rightly pointed out we have first-world problems to deal with, no true tyranny, no true oppression. I hate politics on these forums but I just find this mentality very interesting.
Click to expand...

You must have missed it when law enforcement went house to house in Louisiana right after Katrina hit. At gunpoint hey disarmed law abiding citizens of their firearms just when looting was begining. They knew they had them because they pulled the registered firearms lists so they could hunt them down. And many of those illiegally confiscated/stolen firearms have never been returned.

You are blind. You think that maybe these little things arn't a big deal because they don't effect you right now, today. They though the same thing in 1930's Germany. Tyranny is implemented little by little until it has enough momentum to overthrow a people's freedom. Nazi Germany wasn't born overnight; here a little and there a little freedom was chipped away at until the people had lost their freedom. The right to keep and bear arms is not just for person protection from criminals or hunting, but as a check against governmental tyranny. Either learn from the lessons of history or be damned by them; you can choose... at least for now.
 
saludable24 said:
You must have missed it when law enforcement went house to house in Louisiana right after Katrina hit. At gunpoint hey disarmed law abiding citizens of their firearms just when looting was begining. They knew they had them because they pulled the registered firearms lists so they could hunt them down. And many of those illiegally confiscated/stolen firearms have never been returned.

You are blind. You think that maybe these little things arn't a big deal because they don't effect you right now, today. They though the same thing in 1930's Germany. Tyranny is implemented little by little until it has enough momentum to overthrow a people's freedom. Nazi Germany wasn't born overnight; here a little and there a little freedom was chipped away at until the people had lost their freedom. The right to keep and bear arms is not just for person protection from criminals or hunting, but as a check against governmental tyranny. Either learn from the lessons of history or be damned by them; you can choose... at least for now.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not blind, I just refuse to give in to paranoia and irrational fear. To each their own, and by the way I'm by no means anti-gun, I own several and carry one every day when I work. And in a relative political sense Nazi Germany was born almost overnight.
 
Rodja said:
Pretty sure there isn't anything regarding firearms in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. All in all, that's what we are truly entitled to as people and everything above that is an amenity
Click to expand...

Much respect to you personally, but this post is crap. Man's right to the means to defends himself and his family and property are inherently his and need not be confired or limited by some declaration of his rights by a body of men as if they had the authority to grant them to him. Our rights are inherent to us as human beings and are self evident. Government does not exist to grant unto us our God given rights; it exists to maintain and ensure them. Any action by the government to the contrary is very dangerous.
 
Last edited:
Turbo6GN said:
No, I'm not blind, I just refuse to give in to paranoia and irrational fear. To each their own, and by the way I'm by no means anti-gun, I own several and carry one every day when I work. And in a relative political sense Nazi Germany was born almost overnight.
Click to expand...

One does not have to be fearful or paranoid about gun control to acknowledge that there appear to be efforts to curtail the freedom of law abiding citizens or to aknowledge the brazen deprivation of their rights. But, we can agree to disagree as to whether these things matter.
 
saludable24 said:
You must have missed it when law enforcement went house to house in Louisiana right after Katrina hit. At gunpoint hey disarmed law abiding citizens of their firearms just when looting was begining. They knew they had them because they pulled the registered firearms lists so they could hunt them down. And many of those illiegally confiscated/stolen firearms have never been returned.

You are blind. You think that maybe these little things arn't a big deal because they don't effect you right now, today. They though the same thing in 1930's Germany. Tyranny is implemented little by little until it has enough momentum to overthrow a people's freedom. Nazi Germany wasn't born overnight; here a little and there a little freedom was chipped away at until the people had lost their freedom. The right to keep and bear arms is not just for person protection from criminals or hunting, but as a check against governmental tyranny. Either learn from the lessons of history or be damned by them; you can choose... at least for now.
Click to expand...

Brother you are on a roll!! You make me proud to be an American! To think all this started over my Deca D**k.
 
Turbo6GN said:
No, I'm not blind, I just refuse to give in to paranoia and irrational fear. To each their own, and by the way I'm by no means anti-gun, I own several and carry one every day when I work. And in a relative political sense Nazi Germany was born almost overnight.
Click to expand...

What do you do for a living?
 
hey moron, it already happened to rich white people in hurricane katrina, get informed f/uck face before you say some stupid s/hit, ya we dont have horrible tyranny yet because we have fought for oour rights but that will vanish man
Turbo6GN said:
Ok, this is a semi-serious question I guess...do you envision some scenario in your mind where the military/police or some other nefarious government agency (helicopters overhead, mirrored sunglasses, dogs barking) is going door-to-door with a clipboard telling people to surrender their firearms?? Do the people that refuse get shot on sight?? Are you the hero that grabs his AR-15 from his closet and escapes into the mountains, kinda like Red Dawn (the 80's version with Patrick Swayze and C. Thomas Howell)

I'm not trying to be rude, but the mentality that "the govt. is going to take my guns" is kinda absurd...besides being logistically impossible everyone knows that "the people rising up in revolution against the tyrannical govt." is some hillbilly fallacy. Nobody will rise up because we might miss Jersey Shore, we have to get the kids to soccer, we don't want to ruin our nice clothes, the new iPhone is coming out and we are going to Golden Corral for dinner. As Rodja rightly pointed out we have first-world problems to deal with, no true tyranny, no true oppression. I hate politics on these forums but I just find this mentality very interesting.
Click to expand...
 
irrational, they all introducing senate, state and ounty bills(possibly executive order to) take the guns, feinsteins bill? are you retarded??? Nazi Germany (hitler) took the guns in 1934 and started invasion in poland in 1939, thats overnight for sure, just stop talking man
Turbo6GN said:
No, I'm not blind, I just refuse to give in to paranoia and irrational fear. To each their own, and by the way I'm by no means anti-gun, I own several and carry one every day when I work. And in a relative political sense Nazi Germany was born almost overnight.
Click to expand...
 
didnt even read this before i posted my pos, YES DUDE YOU ARE THE SH/IT
saludable24 said:
You must have missed it when law enforcement went house to house in Louisiana right after Katrina hit. At gunpoint hey disarmed law abiding citizens of their firearms just when looting was begining. They knew they had them because they pulled the registered firearms lists so they could hunt them down. And many of those illiegally confiscated/stolen firearms have never been returned.

You are blind. You think that maybe these little things arn't a big deal because they don't effect you right now, today. They though the same thing in 1930's Germany. Tyranny is implemented little by little until it has enough momentum to overthrow a people's freedom. Nazi Germany wasn't born overnight; here a little and there a little freedom was chipped away at until the people had lost their freedom. The right to keep and bear arms is not just for person protection from criminals or hunting, but as a check against governmental tyranny. Either learn from the lessons of history or be damned by them; you can choose... at least for now.
Click to expand...
 
SCOTTYS ON FIRE
saludable24 said:
You must have missed it when law enforcement went house to house in Louisiana right after Katrina hit. At gunpoint hey disarmed law abiding citizens of their firearms just when looting was begining. They knew they had them because they pulled the registered firearms lists so they could hunt them down. And many of those illiegally confiscated/stolen firearms have never been returned.

You are blind. You think that maybe these little things arn't a big deal because they don't effect you right now, today. They though the same thing in 1930's Germany. Tyranny is implemented little by little until it has enough momentum to overthrow a people's freedom. Nazi Germany wasn't born overnight; here a little and there a little freedom was chipped away at until the people had lost their freedom. The right to keep and bear arms is not just for person protection from criminals or hunting, but as a check against governmental tyranny. Either learn from the lessons of history or be damned by them; you can choose... at least for now.
Click to expand...
 
Yo guys seriously stop with the bull **** arguments this thread is ment to cure this dudes not working penis ( aside the fact u jerk like 4 times a day) go start another thread in the misc section about all this politics and morality ****
 
Borispili said:
Yo guys seriously stop with the bull **** arguments this thread is ment to cure this dudes not working penis ( aside the fact u jerk like 4 times a day) go start another thread in the misc section about all this politics and morality ****
Click to expand...
Agree!
 
Borispili said:
Yo guys seriously stop with the bull **** arguments this thread is ment to cure this dudes not working penis ( aside the fact u jerk like 4 times a day) go start another thread in the misc section about all this politics and morality ****
Click to expand...

NO BLOOD FOR OIL!
 
Borispili said:
Yo guys seriously stop with the bull **** arguments this thread is ment to cure this dudes not working penis ( aside the fact u jerk like 4 times a day) go start another thread in the misc section about all this politics and morality ****
Click to expand...

Then to help him get things working, let me suggest adding a DHT prohormone like stano, androhard if you can find it, or the new 5-Alpha Test by Forerunner Labs here: Invalid Link Removed

The sublingual B-12 in the 5-Alpha should be great; I loved Dsade's B-12 strips he used to make. Those strips were awsome for calming stress and giving a clean energy and focus; add to that the epiandro in 5-Alpha and you'd get a kick of aggression/libido along with the B-12 effects - a win/win for fixing the issue.
 
saludable24 said:
Then to help him get things working, let me suggest adding a DHT prohormone like stano, androhard if you can find it, or the new 5-Alpha Test by Forerunner Labs here: Invalid Link Removed

The sublingual B-12 in the 5-Alpha should be great; I loved Dsade's B-12 strips he used to make. Those strips were awsome for calming stress and giving a clean energy and focus; add to that the epiandro in 5-Alpha and you'd get a kick of aggression/libido along with the B-12 effects - a win/win for fixing the issue.
Click to expand...

My main problem is I was not taking an AI, I thought Novla was an AI, so my estrogen levels must be very high. I got some Erase Pro and waiting on some Fomerone to tied me over until I can get Adex. I'm also back on Caber, I ran out of Prolactrone.
 
Not to shiat on your day, but I came across this article which cites a peer reviewed study about how Deca is 11 times more damaging to blood vessels and CV than test. You may want to check it out:

ergo-log.com/nandrotest.
 
JoeBrooklyn said:
Ok, I have been on 300mg of Deca twice per week and 600mg of Sustanon twice per week. I have also been using Prolactrone, Unleashed, Nolva and Testosterone Conversion Factor. Up until last night my libido and erections have been through the roof, masturbating or having sex 3-7 times per day.
Yesterday, I masturbated twice and went to see a girl and I counldn't get an erection and when I did it didnt hold. What do I do?
Click to expand...

first you dont have a test base.... you should with the deca and sust lol... welll test sust yea but its weak, shut ya down for sure man. and quit masturbating 5-7 times a day man.... no wonder why u cant get hard. tone the jerkin to 3 times a week. lets the girl do it. stop abusin urself homie!!!!!
 
DrDeca said:
first you dont have a test base.... you should with the deca and sust lol... welll test sust yea but its weak, shut ya down for sure man. and quit masturbating 5-7 times a day man.... no wonder why u cant get hard. tone the jerkin to 3 times a week. lets the girl do it. stop abusin urself homie!!!!!
Click to expand...


So what test should I take with Deca?
And the day the incident happened I only jerked twice and it was 3 hours before. There should've been no reason not to get erect (difficulty cumming yes but not erection). Also, the fact that a couple of times I got to about 90% hard and then lost it is a symptom of high estrogen.
 
Half of my guns arnt registered:P so luckily no one knows I have them.

"if you want peace, prepare for war"
 
I always thought abnormally high estrogen levels will cause penile reduction? I thought thats what male to female transsexuals do, external estrogen with androgen blocker. Get an AI fast
 
JoeBrooklyn said:
I did, and I dont think thats true.
Click to expand...
Oh I see my friend. So very high levels of estrogen wont permanently reduce penile length/cause smooth muscle redution? Thats good because I used to take about 50 grams of fenugreek a day for a week to control my hairloss as prescribed by my ayurvedic doctor and I had ED for 2 months after. Hopefully it didnt cause permanent damage. How did the Aromatose inhibtior workfor you?
 
Gungadin said:
Oh I see my friend. So very high levels of estrogen wont permanently reduce penile length/cause smooth muscle redution? Thats good because I used to take about 50 grams of fenugreek a day for a week to control my hairloss as prescribed by my ayurvedic doctor and I had ED for 2 months after. Hopefully it didnt cause permanent damage. How did the Aromatose inhibtior workfor you?
Click to expand...

I never heard of that. Men who take female hormones do it to grow breasts if I'm not mistaken. As for AI, I bought Erase Pro and it seems ok. My supplier can't get the Arimedex yet and I ordered some Formerone, I haven't received it yet.
 
Rodja said:
Soft tyranny....

Are you having to worry about food rations, clean water supply, civil war? Exactly.

This is what we have to bitch about in the US; whether or not we can own a gun or use testosterone. Do you now how ****ing spoiled we are? We constantly bitch about gas prices here, but fail to realize that gas has been much more expensive in Europe for decades. We have it great here. Stop whining.
Click to expand...

Fkn ae! Gas here is $2.29 PER LITRE. And thats NZ dollar.
 
The fact that everywhere else sucks more is not a reason not to be vigilant when it comes to civil liberties. My oathe to support and the derend the constitution has no expiration date. But how did we get back to talking about politics?
 
MIGUEL1J said:
:) women say it all the time so you can keep eating cat :)
Click to expand...

Well, if it's done right, it's the one sure fire way to make a woman cum.
They say there are vaginal orgasms but I read an article from a woman saying that there is no such thing and another that says that if there is such a thing it's just a clitoral orgasm and she doesnt realize it's it. Women's bodies are so confusing they dont even know how it works, that's why there are volumes of books written on how women cum; but how many books have been written on how men cum? None, because it's simple and we know how to do it and how to teach you to do it.
 
JoeBrooklyn said:
Well, if it's done right, it's the one sure fire way to make a woman cum.
They say there are vaginal orgasms but I read an article from a woman saying that there is no such thing and another that says that if there is such a thing it's just a clitoral orgasm and she doesnt realize it's it. Women's bodies are so confusing they dont even know how it works, that's why there are volumes of books written on how women cum; but how many books have been written on how men cum? None, because it's simple and we know how to do it and how to teach you to do it.
Click to expand...

I'm rolling on the floor :) love it, but one question why are you reading women's articles. We come f**k it up and leave. Lol no reading required. Just go hard they will come and love it more:) I'm just saying lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top