IMO it's gotta do with Testosterone shut down, but that's what Clomid-Nolva-HCG are for. I'd rather do fewer 8 weeks than more frequent 4 week cycles, but some people like the 4on 4off strategy betteriamcdn said:bump: why do most ppl suggest running 4 on 4 off 4 on 4 off with 2 PCT's ... faster recovery is that the only reason
Originally posted by windwords7
It acutally has to do with the fact that MOST people have little to no gains after week 4 on dermals. The recovery issues are secondary. The evidence speaks for itsefl. Its better to gain for 4 weeks, take a break and the gain for 4 more rather than gain for the first 4 on an 8 week cycle and then gain little to nothing the next 4 weeks.
NPursuit said:
Also by running a cycle 8 weeks you run the chance of increasing side effects. I know There is another thread going on about this and Chemo wants to revisit the benefits of running a cycle 6 to 8 weeks long for people that use clomid or nolva post cycle.
Originally posted by iamcdn
****, i have no idea now ... a couple admins say 4weeks... a couple say 6-8 weeks
im so confused right now ...
Big D said:I would difinitely start with 4 weeks, but if your still gaining hard, I might consider going further. I'm in week 5 and so far I feel like I might go to 6. Listen to your body: Why stop if your not slowing down? Why continue if you feel like your not gaining any more?
Big D said:I would difinitely start with 4 weeks, but if your still gaining hard, I might consider going further. I'm in week 5 and so far I feel like I might go to 6. Listen to your body: Why stop if your not slowing down? Why continue if you feel like your not gaining any more?
SCORPIO said:
This advice is right on the money. If you have experience with ph's and hardly come across any sides, go with the longer cycle. Be sure you have nolva/clomid or both. With the current recipie and access to stronger meds, I see no problem doing longer cycles, as long as you know what you're doing. Good luck.