Search results

  1. Solo Longjack supp?

    I too have BB's LJ100. I posted earlier in this thread that in just a few short days, I could feel it more than weeks on Nutrex TesteED.

  2. Solo Longjack supp?

    1 cap. Going to take the other one around 1pm CST, so 30 minutes. I didn't experience nausea, but I did lose some steam in the gym. I think I felt the motivational effects for about 30 minutes, then I sort of came down. I did also take it with 250mg of Shilajit, so perhaps I need to try it...

  3. Solo Longjack supp?

    Just took my morning dose of 2%. See how I go...

  4. Solo Longjack supp?

    You talking about the 2 or 10 or both? Cheers.

  5. Solo Longjack supp?

    Gotta say it’s somewhat discouraging hearing about the fatigue and nausea effects from the ND TKA at 10% and 2%. I’ve never experienced those on OL or Barlowes. I did purchase the ND 2% and will give it a go. What dosage are you guys doing the ND 2%?

  6. Solo Longjack supp?

    Interesting. I don't think I've taken any TKA or LJ100 product that made me drowsy like that. Have you had that experience on other products with TKA?

  7. Solo Longjack supp?

    Which one are you taking and how much? Thx!

  8. Solo Longjack supp?

    In just two days of this product I felt more of a boost than 2 weeks on TestED. Ugh... How's everyone else going with their solo TKA supps?

  9. Solo Longjack supp?

    A while back I picked up some Bluebonnet LJ100, cause I OL was out. Haven't tried it yet. Invalid Link Removed

  10. Solo Longjack supp?

    Yeah, I think that I was doing 2-3 of the 200:1 and it was too much. Thanks for chiming in. Perhaps I could give the 100:1 a shot again.

  11. Solo Longjack supp?

    Always read good feedback on Barlowe's products. I remember trying Barlowe's TKA back in 2015. It seemed to drop my libido a bit, so I stopped and who knows what happened. I can't recall which one I had the 100 or 200:1. I'm really interested in how you guys go with the Nootropics Depot...

  12. Solo Longjack supp?

    Same experience with these two points above. I miss a simple TA or LJ100 pill that's effective. The 'kitchen sink' approach seemed to take have really since off a few years ago, but they mostly include stuff that I don't respond well to, so I'm in the same boat with OP.

  13. Safe stack? Low libido but why? (BMP, M-Test and more)

    This. I've been down the road several times with "low libido/soft erections" and going the supplement and stack route. I don't want to assume you're not on top of it, but I do want to help by adding some thoughts... You may have some unconscious anxiety or stress; meaning, you don't feel...

  14. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    Here you go, brother. Per below, SERMs are showing positive progress on the prevention and treatment of PCa. Thanks for suggested to look it up. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that raloxifene, a SERM, induces apoptosis in the androgen-responsive human prostate cancer cell...

  15. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    Gotcha. So based on that, there will never be high-confidence TRT is low-risk for high-risk men. I Will wait to see how the research progresses. For now, I'll just monitor my levels annually as I have been and look at any alternatives as needed before seriously considering TRT. Cheers. And...

  16. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    Thanks, man. Read all that you sent in the links and there is great info that's very promising for sure! On what you posted above, however, it only addresses there MAY be a viable option for ALREADY with prostate cancer. This does not address the amount of confidence science has in giving...

  17. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    Truth and wise words. Great post, man. Cheers!

  18. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    100%. Like I said, it shocked me to read a few studies that said many men end up getting PCa, but they die at older age from something else. The prostate is just a shitty organ, I guess. Ha! But some men have a rougher run with it due to genetics.

  19. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    Yup, agree. If high test or test in general caused PCa, why doesn't every 18 year old have PCa, right? I believe the recent studies that support negating the 1941 study by Huggins and Hodges. Overall, I have read the studies that are now saying TRT for survivors of PCa shows benefit. But...

  20. Show Evidence: TRT is OK for High-risk (family history) Prostate Cancer 44 y/o

    This is really good info. Thanks for sharing, man. I bolded what I want to see more research on. If TRT increases total/free test, and then concurrently DHT and E2, then what is the protocol? Do you then take something to reduce the DHT and E2, which then does that make the TRT...
Back
Top