Search results

  1. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered Drug test

    a drug test is a broad thing. You could get a standard 4 panel drug test, or a more extensive one depeneding on the job. Based on the compounds you're listing, It's highly highly unlikely anything will come up as a false positive or a positive.
  2. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered Nitrates for pump

    Im not sure what math those companies are using on their labels but it is incorrect based on this basic math...I know I am not incorrect on my end here.
  3. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered Nitrates for pump

    You can figure out the numbers for yourself to confirm pretty easily...here's how you do it Arginine Nitrate Arginine molecular weight: 174.2g/mol Nitrate molecular weight: 62.0049g/mol Total molecule weight: 236.2049g/mol Now that you have the individual and total molecular weights, to find...
  4. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered 'Not for human consumption': Your nutritional supplements may be extremely dangerous

    the ones I'm quoting/speaking about were all "not for human consumption". Again, if they're selling RC's that are likely to be consumed, it becomes dicey. A website that sells RC's that just coincidentally all have steroid cycle/bodybuilding implications is an exact example of this. Same with...
  5. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered 'Not for human consumption': Your nutritional supplements may be extremely dangerous

    Invalid Link Removed if you sell a RC knowing that it will most likely be used for human consumption, it gets dicey. Yes, the FDA has shut down more than 1-2 of these.
  6. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered Nitrates for pump

    on paper, arginine nitrate > all. when discussing real world use, I always opted for potassium/sodium nitrate because it was SO much cheaper
  7. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered 'Not for human consumption': Your nutritional supplements may be extremely dangerous

    there have been quite a few RCs shut down over the years. I don't think it's as kosher as many on this forum believe.
  8. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered LJ100

    the studies make me fearful that it's smoke and mirrors. It may not be, but almost any time there's a supplement that makes big claims and has dubious studies behind it, it ends up being bunk. It MAY be a great ingredient, but without the appropriate science behind it it's a hard sell for me...
  9. VaughnTrue

    Answered Back pumps

    take 10g creatine, 10g taurine and call me in the morning also, stop taking so many damn orals at once.
  10. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered LJ100

    the studies on LJ100 are surprisingly non-acceptable. Go to the manufacturers website and see every study they use to justify their claims, and you'll quickly see what I mean. It's a shame.
  11. VaughnTrue

    FDA issues warning letters regarding DMHA and phenibut

    Look at how companies have gotten big in the past. Almost every single time, it's as a result of them selling stuff that is either banned, or gray area. How else would the be able to differentiate from the competition? If the entire industry is tightened down and we all have the same available...
  12. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    I'm going to try and go point by point here so I don't miss anything: Unfortunately (and I mean that seriously), yes. Doctors are not pharmacists. Doctors are generally incredibly intelligent people, but they're not trained in pharmacology...that's why there's a completely separate school for...
  13. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    I think my major gripe with DSHEA is its lack of details. This is what is fueling the DMAA argument. How many studies does it take to prove something is found within a botanical? Is it 1 single study conducted in India? Do Indian/Chinese studies not count? Is it 5 studies? A meta study...etc...
  14. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    I'm a huge fan of DSHEA. I believe we should be held to it strictly. The OP in this does not impact or deviate from DSHEA.
  15. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    beyond my comment above however, if i was still employed at HTP, I could very easily have the same opinion or even "DMAA should not be legal" and still be employed and do my job well at HTP. Note, in just about every post I ever made in reference to HTP and DMAA, I made it apparent that my...
  16. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    I am not employed by HTP in any fashion. They were my employer until summer '18. As for DMAA, my non-employed opinion is simple and it echoes my statements above. If DMAA is found within the food chain (in this instance as a botanical), was not investigated as a drug prior to its release on...
  17. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    Peanut oil is non-allergenic as it does not contain the proteins that cause allergy reactions. Come on Wesley. Stop being purposefully obtuse. Know what peanut oil has on its resume? A monograph. Want to use grapeseed oil? Get a damn monograph.
  18. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    it is good news. there is absolutely NO business combining herbs with drugs for exactly the reason I listed above. compound pharmacies are supposed to be PHARMACIES and sell drugs. You want to sell dietary supplements? Awesome. Have them manufactured as such and sold as such while following...
  19. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    Guys, the amount of half truths being thrown around here is insane. This revolves around COMPOUND PHARMACIES selling drugs. You can't put a natural herb/extract in with a drug unless it has an established monograph. This is a GOOD thing. If you have 5mg of drug "A" and 500mg of herb "B", the...
  20. VaughnTrue

    Unanswered FDA at it again🤷🏼‍♂️

    this doesnt involve dietary supplements.
Back
Top