Whoa um, that’s completely news to me.. are you being sarcastic?
The long term inflammation is bad. Linked to heart issues and even cancer. Definitely a Product that needs to be cycled
Do you even know what an article is?
I literally pulled quotes from what you posted, but if that goes over your head then I can’t help.
Hey guys, so I’m coming up on my 3 month use of arachidonic acid. It has been by far the best supplement I’ve used to increase strength and move past PRs.
As title states, what are the pros/cons to continual usage/not cycling?
thanks!!
The long term inflammation is bad. Linked to heart issues and even cancer. Definitely a Product that needs to be cycled
alright.
Well I’ve taken a little over 12 weeks and have a bit of a bottle to finish, would it be a good idea for me to do that or is 12 weeks pushing it?
Corrected that for you.
Also, hard to tell if you are talking about inflammation in general or making some wide reaching generalization that because ArA can increase inflammation that it causes this because apparently all inflammation is bad.
Cool link for those actually wanting to read into it if anyone is looking to move past fear mongering and dive into the actual nuance.
Some quotes from the actual text linked:
Nutrition is quite complicated and personal interactions with nearly any intervention is nuanced, it is important to keep these things in mind and avoid being too broad with sweeping generalizations.
Some other potential things highlighted in the above text with regards to other studies:
ArA may also be beneficial for cognition in elderly (due to poor ArA metabolism with aging): Invalid Link Removed
ArA (in combination with DHA) may be cardioprotective as we age (and we have tons of reports of increased blood flow being a major benefit in those who supplement with it): Invalid Link Removed
So again it is a nuanced topic.
Sorry got off topic and don't want to make this way too long, so I won't even go too detailed on how it specifically interacts with hypertrophy, strength and power (there are other threads you can search for or I can link later).
Now for OP.
It is going to come down to your personal situations, your diet and your training approaches.
It is important to remember ArA is an omega-6 fatty acid. PUFA generally have positive health benefits, especially when consumed with proper ratios of omega-3 fatty acids and in place of too many saturated fats. ArA is found in a variety of foods, especially those bodybuilders like to eat (fish, poultry, eggs, beef, etc. which why it was narrowed down to test for potential anabolic benefits). That is important to keep in mind because one of the hypothesized reasons why some people may respond more to its supplementation than others may come down to baseline levels in ones diet, so if you even if you stop supplementing it may still be in your diet in a baseline level (which is fine).
Which leads to the above about personalization. For intensive hypertrophy or strength training cycles and/or periods where you supplement with higher dosages (maybe above 1g) it may make sense to "cycle" it or have periods of lesser intake.
Now if you don't eat foods with much ArA and/or you seem to respond really well to supplementation then smaller long term doses like 250-500mg daily may also make sense.
So potentially 4-16 weeks of higher dosing (like normally recommended or above like some people feel inclined to run), followed by periods without or smaller dosages, or even just long term low dosage in certain situations are all perfectly viable options, as long as you are a healthy and exercising human who follows good training and nutritional strategies.
Now the caveat is that it probably does have some situations to lower dosage and/or avoid, but if you get great results and don't have these issues no need stressing over it unnecessarily. Those with certain specific inflammatory conditions, those advised to lower omega-6 intakes, and/or those with certain aches/pains may be better off looking elsewhere.
Sorry for the overly long post, but I just feel it is a bit weird how quickly everyone lately wants to just dog pile ArA. We have a natural anabolic with actually a lot of studies to sift through (probably why it is hard, can't just make up random stuff or be bothered to read through it all) and not just something with a bunch of vague trust me bro BS, but because it is complicated everyone just focuses on some of the scary buzzwords or negative reviews, when we literally have tons of people who absolutely loved this stuff and if it was released again today with no prior knowledge people would be dying to use. Just weird when so many people also easily recommend much sketchier, more untested, and poorly regulated "products" on here daily without a second thought.
Happy to answer more if needed.
There is a lot of misinformation in this thread, and some of it seems to be being pushed by another company representative trying to scare you away from ARA.
ARA has tons of safety studies. When it was first introduced 20+ years ago as a supplement, there was some debate as to if it would have any side effects and over the years, tons of studies have been done showing the health benefits of ARA supplementation.
We live in a world where you can find studies on almost anything - sometimes even researchers just trying to make observations to get funding for future studies. It's important to look at studies in context, especially if 50 studies say 1 thing and 1 says something different.
On one of the studies that was posted, @Resolve10 did a great job touching on exactly what that study was saying, as its important to actually understand what a study is saying rather than just post the links and trying to misinform or scare people about something.
That study clearly says:
Although our body requires AA, consuming too much of it could be problematic. Israel, one of the countries with the highest level of AA intake, has high prevalence rates of atherosclerosis, diabetes, obesity, and hypertension [188]. This may be, however, confounded by saturated fat and heme iron contained in AA-rich red meat leading to a higher risk of dyslipidemia, thereby an increased risk of CVD.
^^^ That wasn't on ARA supplementation, it was done as a cultural statistic on increased risk of those conditions. That culture consumes the highest amount of ARA because they consume the highest amount of red meat. The researchers clearly state that they don't know if those things are related to the ARA content or to the high saturated fat and high iron content.
ARA can be cycled or used daily. The old school thought was using it daily for 8 to 12 weeks and then taking a break. Then, as a lot of people got into using it for pre-workout only, many people started using it for much longer periods of time - because they weren't using it daily, they were taking breaks between using it anyway between workout days.
Long term chronic inflammation is bad in general, but equating ARA to systemic inflammation is a bit misleading.
There are hundreds, if not thousands more studies that would relate simple sugar to systemic inflammation moreso than ARA.
12 weeks wasn't even pushing it 20 years ago when it first came out.
Even when people were being super cautious with it and using it daily, 8 to 12 weeks was the minimum cycle length.
There are people here that use ARA year round and have no negative health issues with it.
I'm going to post another post in a moment giving a lot of the study conclusions from real actual studies so that you can see it in context.
Clarification:
I was not pushing anything.
I posted the Whole thing.
If I were pushing a narrative... I'd do that opposite.
I .... Didn't do that.
I have nothing to gain personally, from him using this supplement, or not.
If I did ... My response should probably be deeper scrutinized.
I posted the whole thing ... So everyone would have all of the information.
It was my hope that the OP, and everyone, would read it for themselves, and come to their own conclusions.
So OP ... And everyone else....
Please, just read the article, and ignore all of the commentary (including my own).
Thanks for all the in-depth replies guys.
So I’m vegetarian and that means I probably don’t get much ArA in my diet. Maybe that’s why my strength PRs in certain muscle groups really went up quick.
I think I’ll finish this bottle, which would be a total of about 13 weeks on ArA, then take a break. How long do breaks typically last? I actually was possibly thinking about anabolic xt next, we’ll see. But man, nothing has pushed me past PRs as quickly as ArA
I workout typically 6-7 days a week , rotating push/pull and different muscle groups. Same intensity, relatively short workouts.
The main reason I do this is because my work/sleep schedule doesn’t really allow for full workouts on what would be 3-4x week time wise. Also going to the gym daily really helps me start the day right, relieve stress, provides structure, etc etc
so I’m essentially taking ArA everyday.