Darkhorse192
Well-known member
Invalid Link Removed
Do you mean it’s a drug from Patrick Arnold? Or the info is from him?
That’s pretty dang cool though! Thanks for sharing!
Ya I more just enjoy the interactions and staying up to date so I’m not so lost when people talk about some of these things.
There is a huge market with the semaglutide, tir, ret, craze going on. Will be interesting how fast they try to push it as an add on.There's no way to really know at this time if the drug is going to have any real world benefit at building muscle in healthy males, but does seem to help reduce muscle loss in people with medical conditions.
From other reading on this, it seems like one route that is being speculated on this is that its going to be combined with the GLP to in theory help reduce the muscle loss than many see on GLP's.
It's not something I would be overly excited about or would try personally unless/until there was any actual great real world feedback on it, but always interested in reading up on new things. I'd read a lot about this one a few months back.
There is a huge market with the semaglutide, tir, ret, craze going on. Will be interesting how fast they try to push it as an add on.
If it has any use the population will gobble it up. The Chinese will be throwing it out there like candy for the population who doesn't care to diet and needs drugs like they're doing with ret since pre trials seem to show it more effective.That is actually how I came across reading on this new drug was some saying it would be able to help combat the muscle loss that people are seeing with those types of drugs.
I'm not sure that it will bc I think that's taking a big leap assuming that helping with muscle loss in aging individuals will help with muscle loss in people from not consuming enough or the proper nutrients or other possible pathways that some of those may cause muscle loss. I say that because no one seems to be able to agree on if or how many other ways that they may negatively impact muscle.
That is actually how I came across reading on this new drug was some saying it would be able to help combat the muscle loss that people are seeing with those types of drugs.
I'm not sure that it will bc I think that's taking a big leap assuming that helping with muscle loss in aging individuals will help with muscle loss in people from not consuming enough or the proper nutrients or other possible pathways that some of those may cause muscle loss. I say that because no one seems to be able to agree on if or how many other ways that they may negatively impact muscle.
So is an anti-catabolic agent but not an anabolic procursor, preserve muscle doesn't mean create muscle, right?
From his article posted aboveSo is an anti-catabolic agent but not an anabolic procursor, preserve muscle doesn't mean create muscle, right?
From his article posted above
this drug is a muscle builder and I will bet the farm that it will be “abused” as such by athletes / bodybuilders in the near future
It may be advertisement toward the compound since I haven't looked into his financial involvement but pat alludes to it being anabolic
Lots of assumptions in that. He says thisIt's a pharma drug, not anything Pat is personally involved with.
He is saying that he thinks that like with most things, that bodybuilders will try to abuse it to see if its an effective muscle builder. But the pharma studies show it being for sarcopenia and slowing muscle wasting in aging individuals; I think that's what he meant when he was asking about it being anti-catabolic.
My neighbor buddy who goes to happy hour and huge expensed lunches and dinners 4 days a week because "he's in sales" and never does anything physically active other than golfing once a week- "I don't get how you stay so fit in your 40's and always have the energy to keep going..." Lol, this was just yesterday.
If it has any use the population will gobble it up. The Chinese will be throwing it out there like candy for the population who doesn't care to diet and needs drugs like they're doing with ret since pre trials seem to show it more effective.
Invalid Link Removed
Some of the logs I've seem on it is crazy, clinical max dosing logs are abundant. I mean it has its place but, 90% just need to eat better, less, or have no self control
Like my obese neighbor that's diabetic... he went on a water diet and then 2 days later comes back by with 2 XL sweet teas...
This is the problem with the drugs. If you change nothing, you rely on the drug for everything.What is even sillier is that when you do lose weight with one of these GLP-1 agonists, and then stop taking it, the weight comes right back if you return to your old habits. You have to learn healthy eating habits and exercise anyway, so why not just do that upfront? Or you can just stay on the **** for the rest of your life I guess.
Lots of assumptions in that. He says this
Bottom line here is let’s not fool ourselves - this drug is a muscle builder
Make your own conclusions
I'd argue tir is more popular since is it is shown to be more effective and available. Sema is available but ret is less available and even more effective than both, so may take the cake soonThere are a ton of dudes over on professional muscle on semaglutide lol, like a drug that gives a remote hint of helping someone build muscle or lose fat, people will instantly abuse it.
What is even sillier is that when you do lose weight with one of these GLP-1 agonists, and then stop taking it, the weight comes right back if you return to your old habits. You have to learn healthy eating habits and exercise anyway, so why not just do that upfront? Or you can just stay on the **** for the rest of your life I guess.
This is what I'm on the edge on. I have encouraged some to take these drugs in hopes they lose weight they desperately need. At the same time if they just changed their habits the situation would resolve itselfIf we were going to able to instill these habits and education on such habits in this population we would have already done so. ANYONE who wishes to learn about such things has access to all the information in the world at their fingertips. The chances of instilling such knowledge and habits into someone who has twinkies on the brain 24/7 is basically ZERO. I think these drugs are FANTASTIC tools that can turn down the volume of EAT EAT EAT messaging these people have 24/7. Are they the be all end all? NO, but they give us a better chance of teaching those that want to learn how to do it without the drug.
Worse case scenarion: They end up taking these things for life, aweful right? WRONG. WHO FUCKING CARES IF THEY TAKE SEMGLUTIDE FOR LIFE????
If they don't treat their obesity they will end up on the following: hypertension meds, cholesterol meds, heart disease meds, blood thinners(after their first stent if they are lucky enough to survivie the heart attack) and drum roll please.....................TYPE 2 DIABETES MEDS ANYWAYS. And all of these ARE FOR LIFE.
So one drug for life and a patient that is at a decent FUNCTIONAL weight
OR
A laundry list of drugs, horrible quality of life and a patient that needs a scooter to endure a trip to walmart. Harm reduction is sometimes the best you can hope for.
It's a pharma drug, not anything Pat is personally involved with.
He is saying that he thinks that like with most things, that bodybuilders will try to abuse it to see if its an effective muscle builder. But the pharma studies show it being for sarcopenia and slowing muscle wasting in aging individuals; I think that's what he meant when he was asking about it being anti-catabolic.
Same thing happened with anavar.
Is anti-catabolic a low dosage and when you take it x2, mg to mg, is really strong as a muscle builder.
I'm gonna read more about this new chemical.