Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Stocks

Fine I’ll say it, if AMC squeezes to 100k better load the boat with GTI!!

Not financial advice, nobody wanna get sued here but you can contact William :)

Lol
 
Is gtii shorted just as hard?


Yup and on top supposedly only stock with proof already out there document stating over 300mil shares

Which is more then the float it self lol
 
Yup and on top supposedly only stock with proof already out there document stating over 300mil shares

Which is more then the float it self lol

I'd like to see this 'proof' of 300 million shorts. That sounds EXACTLY like all the fake pump crap the youtubers were spreading about AMC. Lou and his stupid Guatemalans. Fuggedaboudit.

Sounds like Ham and this William guy are trying to copy the original GME model and force their own short squeeze. Desperately tryjng. Too desperately!! But I don't see the market letting that happen so easily again....

Be careful !!
 
I'd like to see this 'proof' of 300 million shorts. That sounds EXACTLY like all the fake pump crap the youtubers were spreading about AMC. Lou and his stupid Guatemalans. Fuggedaboudit.

Sounds like Ham and this William guy are trying to copy the original GME model and force their own short squeeze. Desperately tryjng. Too desperately!! But I don't see the market letting that happen so easily again....

Be careful !!

i think ax1 posted the document .. ive seen it as well and legit stuff .. which is why GTII have said it over and over no RS dont want to go on nasdaq
 
Well, if AMC gives me some profits, I'll buy in. I mean, a hundred shares below a dollar isn't a big deal lol

It’s not but when u keep aching down and end up with 3000 lol
 
Fintel has GTII short interest at 0.1% with only 1.0 days to cover.

Invalid Link Removed

View attachment 234500

I stopped looking at all that when amc has been 900-1000% and nothjng has happened .. I don’t believe In anything we are provided unless it’s court documents
 
Is gtii shorted just as hard?

Nobody knows for sure but GTII is estimated to be naked shorted some 400 million shares out of a estimate free float of 50 million. There are no official numbers for either play.

Difference between GTII and AMC though is GTII is mostly naked shorted by a single smaller hedgefund that is in both financial and legal trouble, where AMC is shorted by more than several huge ones including one of the biggest ever.
 
Yup and on top supposedly only stock with proof already out there document stating over 300mil shares

Which is more then the float it self lol

So as far as I understand that 300 million (now 400 million) are estimates by Hamshortkiller, but yes there is a official document and GTII is the only stock out there where the government confirms a broker is deficient in holding a stock they shorted.
 
i think ax1 posted the document .. ive seen it as well and legit stuff .. which is why GTII have said it over and over no RS dont want to go on nasdaq

Alpine sought an expedited stay because NSCC informed it that the charge would be
effective November 1, 2022. NSCC informed Alpine that deficiencies it observed in September
2022 caused Alpine to fall below the backtesting target, and it attributed the deficiencies to
Alpine’s “net short portfolios with the top driver being a concentrated short position in GTII.”

Official source: Invalid Link Removed
 
I'd like to see this 'proof' of 300 million shorts. That sounds EXACTLY like all the fake pump crap the youtubers were spreading about AMC. Lou and his stupid Guatemalans. Fuggedaboudit.

Sounds like Ham and this William guy are trying to copy the original GME model and force their own short squeeze. Desperately tryjng. Too desperately!! But I don't see the market letting that happen so easily again....

Be careful !!

The hedgefund in litigation with the DTCC has 10s of thousands of illegal violations, thats why the DTCC is fighting to have them obliterated.
 
Sounds like Ham and this William guy are trying to copy the original GME model and force their own short squeeze. Desperately tryjng. Too desperately!! But I don't see the market letting that happen so easily again....

HAM is the first and original guy to call out GME in the first place and posted a paper about that, months prior to Roaring Kitty. That was when GME was in single digits. Doesnt mean this will equate to GTII squeezing but he calls this the best short squeeze setup he has ever seen.

Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed
 
For you AMC holders, I havent posted these in a long time but the past couple weeks CTB has been around 1k%

Invalid Link Removed
 
HAM is the first and original guy to call out GME in the first place and posted a paper about that, months prior to Roaring Kitty. That was when GME was in single digits. Doesnt mean this will equate to GTII squeezing but he calls this the best short squeeze setup he has ever seen.

Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed

I would love that to be gtii.. don’t care much for fngr well I’m in it bc ima. Gambler need one to hit will hold till hear company talk about Ra blah blah crap like Jeremy from vocl killed his own stock
 
I would love that to be gtii.. don’t care much for fngr well I’m in it bc ima. Gambler need one to hit will hold till hear company talk about Ra blah blah crap like Jeremy from vocl killed his own stock

I have a small amount of FNGR but Im more rooting it more so as I totally believe FNGR holders will only dump it into GTII.
 
Nobody knows for sure but GTII is estimated to be naked shorted some 400 million shares out of a estimate free float of 50 million. There are no official numbers for either play.


I read this as nobody knows and all the 300 million numbers are guesses. Like a billion AMC guatemalans.

And the numbers are bullshit. The shorts could borrow a few thousand shares legally and trade them back and forth ten thousand times a day to rack up numbers. They might be guilty of stock manipulation... but there are not hundreds of million of fake shares that no one has to buy back. Ever. Some guy on the internet invented that story and hungry dudes keep repeating it.

Sorry. Buy after the year long AMC scam, that's my take on it.
 
I read this as nobody knows and all the 300 million numbers are guesses. Like a billion AMC guatemalans.

And the numbers are bullshit. The shorts could borrow a few thousand shares legally and trade them back and forth ten thousand times a day to rack up numbers. They might be guilty of stock manipulation... but there are not hundreds of million of fake shares that no one has to buy back. Ever. Some guy on the internet invented that story and hungry dudes keep repeating it.

Sorry. Buy after the year long AMC scam, that's my take on it.

What we know is a broker shorting GTII is official deficient in shares to cover the heaviest position in their own portfolio, so even if it was 10% of that 300 million Ill take that, that alone should have a massive pop should it be covered. We know officially GTII is heavily naked shorted. We know we dont even need anything close to 300 million naked shorts for a squeeze.

AMC ran from single digits to $70, that was an incredible squeeze.

Cover of Forbes 1988

Invalid Link Removed
 
Amc showing hopes again .. but know deep inside will fall a $1-2 lol
 
yeah he killed the momentum ..glad i sold some at 8:30
 
AMC HALT .. think coming down below 5 today
 
Look at the price now. Absolutely garbage.

He is an asshole, he had blamed the very people that saved his company in the first place for getting AMC into trouble for not voting him to dilute, then he tricked us with his unapproved loophole creating APE which he sold for nothing to the very big hedgefunds that shorted the crap out of his company while complimenting how great they are and telling retail, oh, APE was "Free" I gifted you now its time to combine them, reverse split and let us dilute. And now he lost the lawsuit and blaming us even harder.
 
He is an asshole, he had blamed the very people that saved his company in the first place for getting AMC into trouble for not voting him to dilute, then he tricked us with his unapproved loophole creating APE which he sold for nothing to the very big hedgefunds that shorted the crap out of his company while complimenting how great they are and telling retail, oh, APE was "Free" I gifted you now its time to combine them, reverse split and let us dilute. And now he lost the lawsuit and blaming us even harder.
I know I keep bringing it up, but I'm really having a hard time understanding that he even posted that tweet. Like, is he not trying at all to hide his two face? Is no one even trying to hide the manipulation or who's in bed with who anymore? The system is so corrupt it's laughable at this point...to the point it's hard to imagine us "winning" at all...ever. I guess I'm being a negative Nancy or a Debbie downer, but I'm baffled.
 
I think the feeling of "winning" (with a MOASS) now being gone is more about realizing we were duped and it was never there is begin with.

It wasn't taken away.... the double secret billion naked shares were never really a thing, and we were misled by youtube pumpers. IMHO
 
I think the feeling of "winning" (with a MOASS) now being gone is more about realizing we were duped and it was never there is begin with.

It wasn't taken away.... the double secret billion naked shares were never really a thing, and we were misled by youtube pumpers. IMHO
I'm not sure I ever believed the naked shorting thing to begin with, but it was a heavily shorted stock that should still hit bigger numbers then we have seen...how much bigger? No idea, but GME did it with similar numbers we can verify, right?
 
I'm not sure I ever believed the naked shorting thing to begin with, but it was a heavily shorted stock that should still hit bigger numbers then we have seen...how much bigger? No idea, but GME did it with similar numbers we can verify, right?

On that basis, AMC did have its GME spike. It went from $2 to $44 (split adjusted) and has slid and bumped down and down ever since. The MEME stocks all seem to follow the same chart. The one big spike and then a lingering stair step down and down. That first big spike WAS the massive GME move. And then it was over. And anyone buying in after that first big spike got conned.

My issue is that looking back I don't believe the exaggerated naked shorting claims for the same reason I don't believe AMC was ever going to $500 or $1000 or $100,000 and every other ridiculous youtube scammer pumping and pushing this piece of crap as it crashed all the way down to nearly the original $2 starting point again.

F that Trey guy living in a hotel, and fat Lou, and AL the accused molester. They did us wrong! Waaaaay worse than popcorn guy trying to keep a billion dollar business afloat during a global pandemic.

And they are playing the same game and singing the same tune with different stocks now. As if the AMC scam never happened....
 
On that basis, AMC did have its GME spike. It went from $2 to $44 (split adjusted) and has slid and bumped down and down ever since. The MEME stocks all seem to follow the same chart. The one big spike and then a lingering stair step down and down. That first big spike WAS the massive GME move. And then it was over. And anyone buying in after that first big spike got conned.

My issue is that looking back I don't believe the exaggerated naked shorting claims for the same reason I don't believe AMC was ever going to $500 or $1000 or $100,000 and every other ridiculous youtube scammer pumping and pushing this piece of crap as it crashed all the way down to nearly the original $2 starting point again.

F that Trey guy living in a hotel, and fat Lou, and AL the accused molester. They did us wrong! Waaaaay worse than popcorn guy trying to keep a billion dollar business afloat during a global pandemic.

And they are playing the same game and singing the same tune with different stocks now. As if the AMC scam never happened....
Ehhhh, they're all crooks...AA doesn't get a pass on my book either.
 
PLTR earnings 8/7
might be a good swing trade .. if its red today ill buy some in a different brokage to trade in and out and leave my $11/avg account alone

but honestly its one of those stock that i dont mind keep dumping in $ and eventually will head to its true value $22-25
 
Goldman Sachs Gives AMC a New Price Target of $175
Invalid Link Removed

ill be happy with $15 lmao
 
picked up some shares at 4.92 lets see if i timed it good lol
 
Cost to borrow went down from the average of 1k last week.....overall official SI is up to 29% now.

Invalid Link Removed
 
WeBull shows 8 analysts and an average price of only $2.259 !!

Invalid Link Removed

What gives????

that is one of the worst feature in webull... dont think they have updated it for 5 years.

if MMAT webull PT comes out right avg 1.35 i would be filthy rich ( but need that without the RS ) dont think webull is smart enough to figure that in or they update it
 
@ax1

so on 10/15 we will be able to sell those divi shares we had received at whatever the price of GTII is at that moment ?
( i believe that marks the 6months )
 
@ax1

so on 10/15 we will be able to sell those divi shares we had received at whatever the price of GTII is at that moment ?
( i believe that marks the 6months )

What I understood is if they wanted to unlock them they could after 6 months, doesnt mean they will or wont. I dont think the price has any effect on the dividend value other than you will have a 10% dilution I would assume which that would still be 10% more that the shorts have to cover anyways.
 
FWIW
Yahoo finance has same numbers as WeBull. All low and sh1tty

Invalid Link Removed

Looks like this claim of GS giving a $175 target first came from "Marketbeat" and the usual youtube/reddit pumpers are running wild with it.

But I can't find anyone who actually has the statement from Goldman Sachs proving it was true and not a typo....[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
FWIW
Yahoo finance has same numbers as WeBull. All low and sh1tty

Invalid Link Removed

Looks like this claim of GS giving a $175 target first came from "Marketbeat" and the usual youtube/reddit pumpers are running wild with it.

But I can't find anyone who actually has the statement from Goldman Sachs proving it was true and not a typo....
[/QUOTE]

Would have helped if the CEO wasnt captain bail out the shorts.
 
FWIW
Yahoo finance has same numbers as WeBull. All low and sh1tty

Invalid Link Removed

Looks like this claim of GS giving a $175 target first came from "Marketbeat" and the usual youtube/reddit pumpers are running wild with it.

But I can't find anyone who actually has the statement from Goldman Sachs proving it was true and not a typo....
[/QUOTE]
They meant $1.75 lol
 
Back
Top