Imo 4 weeks won’t even be close to enough to cut up from 20% bf bro
tren isn’t a fat burner, it just enables you to maintain muscle even in a pretty severe calorie deficit, it’sa good nutrient partitioner so less of what you eat gets stored as fat and it can tank the appetite so you find a deficit easier to maintain.
however the act of mobilising and burning fat for energy has its limits, it’s a process and can only go so fast.
don’t know your weight but let’s say your 200lbs, you need to lose 20lbs pure fat to be ‘cut up’ (I’m generalising but IMO I think 10% bf is pretty decent unless your competing, certainly you’ll be leaner than most people on a beach)
your simply not going to burn 5lbs of fat per week brother. Calorie math would suggest that’s a 17,500 calorie deficit a week needed (I’m ignoring calorie math is bullshit and doesn’t work as simply as that to illustrate the point), that’s a 2,500 deficit per day - not exactly going to happen and if you did not even tren would avoid muscle loss,
i don’t want to sound like a dick, just trying to be realistic with you.
tren is great, provides a certain look but you have to be leanish to see that really (like 12-13% imo),
after 4 weeks you could definitely lose some bf and start to see a difference but imo I think you’ll need 8-10 depending on diet adherence/training to start to look cut.
my log from last summer probably started just under 20% and used tren. I updated pics throughout (I have loose skin from major weight loss but you’ll get a good idea of what can be done)
second to last page has before and afters
Right then gents, I’ve not logged a cycle in a while but I probably need the accountability it gives so I’m logging this one..... stats 38 yr old, 6’2”, 226lbs Lifting about 7 years now (was formerly a really fat guy). lifts currently squat 330 x 3 (don’t have a cage in my garage so...
anabolicminds.com
