Donald Trump running for president
- Thread starter LiftWithDonuts
- Start date
blackirish36
Member
Jiigzz
Legend
You're way outside your depth comparing those crashes with the pentagon lol. Typically in a crash the pilots try survive, so the speed would be a lot different. Try flying a 757 at max power into a steel building and you'll disintegrate the hollow tube of a plane and flesh off people no problem. A plane isn't solid steel
People like the below and TheFlightChannel make excellent videos on plane crashes, if you're curious.
Invalid Link Removed
Jiigzz
Legend
Here is the remains of a Germanwings plane that was purposely flown into the ground. Note the distinct lack of anything substantial AND the speed discrepancy was about 150km/hr, as this plane hit the mountain at 700km/hr vs the 850km/hr pentagon plane.
Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed
Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed
Last edited:
ax1
Legend
Yeah its buggy here, if it freezes after you post, after a few seconds more than likely its posted. I usually double check on a 2nd window and shut down the other tab as soon as I confirm.
Thanks for the tip, Ill think about it and not hold you liable, lol. Its on my Robinhood app, currently swapping stuff around and trying to leave that and go full time on Fidelity once cash clears. I hate Robinhood after what went down, completely immoral.
ax1
Legend
Am I supposed to believe a youtuber over 200+ experienced pilots and aviation experts that think its total lard and bs?
ax1
Legend
Do you see the indestructible black boxes anywhere down there? Im still looking for them after 20 years.
blackirish36
Member
Power-Lift
Active member
Out of all of the political nonsense, I have one take-a-way:
I've been around quite a while (55 years) I never saw things so bad, and it can only get worse. (Peoples mental health has taken a massive decline, be it social-media, news media, born w/ a phone in hand and no human interaction, etc) not sure the exact issue, probably combined. Things started escalating during Obozo's time in office and when Trump won, the SJW crowd was peaking at the time, and they MELTED like never before. Remember, Obozo was basically left alone for 8 years by the right. The left went bat-**** crazy when Trump won. After 4 years of being under attack, now right-wing tardz are acting like demturdz, everyone attacks each other like their party is a gang they belong to. The leaders have you right where they want you. Most dont see this, they have no sense of thought or mind. Remember what Mike Tyson said? "Social media made you all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it." Most do not have the balls for a one on one confrontation and cant even look anyone in the eye these days. I always judged a prez by how things are (jobs, economy, etc) never chose a side, never new the difference honestly. I liked Clinton, Bush, etc 'cause things were good, I always worked, provided for family, did my thing. Trump was hated for personality, so much, people didnt care about the best economy in 50 years, he is harsh and people are very sensitive these days (melt/cry when their phone breaks, etc). Very delicate snowflakes who's parents have failed miserably. dont choose a side, if you do it should be "US People vs. Big Gov't". It will never happen though, the decline in brain-matter and hard work will continue. People will be tough behind a screen or in groups/gangs. They dont know policy or even care to work. Future will be bad for many, but they are doing it to themselves and welcoming it. Pubtardz vs. Demtardz, battle of the brainless...
I've been around quite a while (55 years) I never saw things so bad, and it can only get worse. (Peoples mental health has taken a massive decline, be it social-media, news media, born w/ a phone in hand and no human interaction, etc) not sure the exact issue, probably combined. Things started escalating during Obozo's time in office and when Trump won, the SJW crowd was peaking at the time, and they MELTED like never before. Remember, Obozo was basically left alone for 8 years by the right. The left went bat-**** crazy when Trump won. After 4 years of being under attack, now right-wing tardz are acting like demturdz, everyone attacks each other like their party is a gang they belong to. The leaders have you right where they want you. Most dont see this, they have no sense of thought or mind. Remember what Mike Tyson said? "Social media made you all way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it." Most do not have the balls for a one on one confrontation and cant even look anyone in the eye these days. I always judged a prez by how things are (jobs, economy, etc) never chose a side, never new the difference honestly. I liked Clinton, Bush, etc 'cause things were good, I always worked, provided for family, did my thing. Trump was hated for personality, so much, people didnt care about the best economy in 50 years, he is harsh and people are very sensitive these days (melt/cry when their phone breaks, etc). Very delicate snowflakes who's parents have failed miserably. dont choose a side, if you do it should be "US People vs. Big Gov't". It will never happen though, the decline in brain-matter and hard work will continue. People will be tough behind a screen or in groups/gangs. They dont know policy or even care to work. Future will be bad for many, but they are doing it to themselves and welcoming it. Pubtardz vs. Demtardz, battle of the brainless...
ax1
Legend
Have you seen the movie Sully? Its a great movie with Tom Hanks based on a true story...Im sure you heard of it, but just in case will minimize details but at the end of the movie they ran mock flights in a courtroom setting (I think it was an investigatory panel) (well connected to the courtroom) to prove what happened. So the point is the Pentagon Flight can be fought and proved/disproven, I wish it can be done.
ax1
Legend
Crap....I bought $1k worth on Fidelity. The problem is I cant sell until my cash clears or I get a strike on my account.
Anyways, not a huge gamble, just wanted in on something.
I had 1,800 shares of AMC and sold it all off at around $3.18, and yes I made a profit but I thought it would dip, LOL a day later Im ripping my hair out!
ax1
Legend
I know this is localized news, but what goes on Libtard NYC is a fast spreading National carcinogen.
De Blasio moves to ban natural gas hookups: 'Literally' our 'only choice is renewable energy'
by Invalid Link Removed |
| January 31, 2021 05:09 PM
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is pushing forward with a green agenda, calling for a ban on natural gas hookups on new buildings in the city by 2030.
“We need to make clear that New York City will renounce fossil fuels fully. Therefore, we need to ban fossil fuel connections in the city by the end of this decade, literally ensuring that our only choice is renewable energy,” de Blasio said in his " Invalid Link Removed address on Friday.
De Blasio’s goals include moving the New York City government to run on “renewable energy in the next four years.” The plan relies on Canadian hydropower, imported into the United States through new transmission lines. Lawmakers in San Francisco passed a similar ordinance in November last year.
All construction after June 2021 must use Invalid Link Removed for cooking, heating, and cooling. The announcement comes after 41 cities have adopted plans to reduce reliance on Invalid Link Removed.
In April 2019, de Blasio introduced his “Green New Deal.” The mayor vowed to ban “inefficient” glass and steel skyscrapers and warned that if building owners refuse to make their properties Invalid Link Removed, they could face fines up to $1 million. New York has committed to being carbon neutral by 2050 and implementing Invalid Link Removed in certain Manhattan neighborhoods.
De Blasio has been criticized for taking a Invalid Link Removed 11 miles from his residence at Gracie Mansion on the Upper East Side of Manhattan to Brooklyn to exercise at a YMCA. In August, Invalid Link Removed to not buy cars, saying, “Cars are the past, the future is going to be mass transit, biking, walking.”
Invalid Link Removed
De Blasio moves to ban natural gas hookups: 'Literally' our 'only choice is renewable energy'
by Invalid Link Removed |
| January 31, 2021 05:09 PM
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio is pushing forward with a green agenda, calling for a ban on natural gas hookups on new buildings in the city by 2030.
“We need to make clear that New York City will renounce fossil fuels fully. Therefore, we need to ban fossil fuel connections in the city by the end of this decade, literally ensuring that our only choice is renewable energy,” de Blasio said in his " Invalid Link Removed address on Friday.
De Blasio’s goals include moving the New York City government to run on “renewable energy in the next four years.” The plan relies on Canadian hydropower, imported into the United States through new transmission lines. Lawmakers in San Francisco passed a similar ordinance in November last year.
All construction after June 2021 must use Invalid Link Removed for cooking, heating, and cooling. The announcement comes after 41 cities have adopted plans to reduce reliance on Invalid Link Removed.
In April 2019, de Blasio introduced his “Green New Deal.” The mayor vowed to ban “inefficient” glass and steel skyscrapers and warned that if building owners refuse to make their properties Invalid Link Removed, they could face fines up to $1 million. New York has committed to being carbon neutral by 2050 and implementing Invalid Link Removed in certain Manhattan neighborhoods.
De Blasio has been criticized for taking a Invalid Link Removed 11 miles from his residence at Gracie Mansion on the Upper East Side of Manhattan to Brooklyn to exercise at a YMCA. In August, Invalid Link Removed to not buy cars, saying, “Cars are the past, the future is going to be mass transit, biking, walking.”
Invalid Link Removed
blackirish36
Member
I am no insider, that's for certain. I think silver is a fundamentally solid option right now, regardless of whether it is a target of WSB. Your point is well taken.
Last edited:
BamBam54
Well-known member
Conspiracy theories are like a religious cult, in that they are based more on a passionate belief than fact. And any facts presented are selective at best.
For example - religious people will often argue that the universe and everything in it had to come from something. HAD TO. It could not have always just been there. So then you ask where God came from to make the universe? And they say, he was always there. Then you get the barrage of detailed papers and youtube videos and selective science and facts meant to prove an opinion, that the Universe could not always have just been there. And yet total acceptance of magical spirit powers to make the opposite true, that god was always there and could 'poof' the universe into existence. Man could not have evolved, scientifically impossible. God "poofing" a woman from a rib? Absolutely. One directional scientific analysis. LOL
The 9/11 conspiracies are no different. Tons of expert opinions and selective facts to argue what something ISN'T, but virtually nothing to make a better case for what it IS. Case in point, the pentagon. If you want to argue that it wasn't a plane, then fine. Explain an alternate theory that stands up to the same level of internet scrutiny. If it was a missile, then what kind of missile, where did it come from, and what happened then to the missing plane?? You can't claim logic to dismantle the plane theory, and then offer not a scintilla of evidence to support the missile theory and play deaf/dumb to any further logical analysis.
We know there was a giant plane in the sky and a giant plane sized hole in the building. Imagine that?!??! Test the missile theory. Name a missile (any missile) that doesn't just blow a hole in the face of a building, but can PLOW a 12-16ft hole some 300ft deep into the building... and then find a missile like that being unaccounted for.
Forget the $2.3 trillion!! Totally irrelevant to any physical damage assessment. A ridiculous red herring. Stick to the basics of what can possibly make a plane sized hole in the building. The plane circling above that we know about? Or an imaginary missile that we have no record of ever existing, that was never launched, and never reported missing.
But 100 pilots say it wasn't possible?? How many thousands of pilots say it was?! It had to be something. The magic bullet defense does not apply here. And the same conspiracy guys argued against that, too....
(*note on building steel and fires... YES the towers were hit by planes. And didn't fall. And never would have were it not for the fires. Note north tower hit at 8:46am and fell at 10:28pm. South tower hit at 9:02 am and fell at 9:59am. About 1 hour later. Spray on fire protection for structural steel is rated for 1-2 hours depending on application. Hmmmm, Imagine that! Science? Conspiracy? Or magic??)
For example - religious people will often argue that the universe and everything in it had to come from something. HAD TO. It could not have always just been there. So then you ask where God came from to make the universe? And they say, he was always there. Then you get the barrage of detailed papers and youtube videos and selective science and facts meant to prove an opinion, that the Universe could not always have just been there. And yet total acceptance of magical spirit powers to make the opposite true, that god was always there and could 'poof' the universe into existence. Man could not have evolved, scientifically impossible. God "poofing" a woman from a rib? Absolutely. One directional scientific analysis. LOL
The 9/11 conspiracies are no different. Tons of expert opinions and selective facts to argue what something ISN'T, but virtually nothing to make a better case for what it IS. Case in point, the pentagon. If you want to argue that it wasn't a plane, then fine. Explain an alternate theory that stands up to the same level of internet scrutiny. If it was a missile, then what kind of missile, where did it come from, and what happened then to the missing plane?? You can't claim logic to dismantle the plane theory, and then offer not a scintilla of evidence to support the missile theory and play deaf/dumb to any further logical analysis.
We know there was a giant plane in the sky and a giant plane sized hole in the building. Imagine that?!??! Test the missile theory. Name a missile (any missile) that doesn't just blow a hole in the face of a building, but can PLOW a 12-16ft hole some 300ft deep into the building... and then find a missile like that being unaccounted for.
Forget the $2.3 trillion!! Totally irrelevant to any physical damage assessment. A ridiculous red herring. Stick to the basics of what can possibly make a plane sized hole in the building. The plane circling above that we know about? Or an imaginary missile that we have no record of ever existing, that was never launched, and never reported missing.
But 100 pilots say it wasn't possible?? How many thousands of pilots say it was?! It had to be something. The magic bullet defense does not apply here. And the same conspiracy guys argued against that, too....
(*note on building steel and fires... YES the towers were hit by planes. And didn't fall. And never would have were it not for the fires. Note north tower hit at 8:46am and fell at 10:28pm. South tower hit at 9:02 am and fell at 9:59am. About 1 hour later. Spray on fire protection for structural steel is rated for 1-2 hours depending on application. Hmmmm, Imagine that! Science? Conspiracy? Or magic??)
ax1
Legend
Possible the fake media hype about Reddit will hype it enough for it to go up short term, I hope. Im sure alot of people go by what mainstream media tell what Reddit says rather than going on Reddit, not the Reddit is necessarily all great.
ax1
Legend
Its pretty obvious your disregarding all the facts and making up conspiracies that the facts are conspiracies to legitimize your passionate belief that our government would never do harm on us. Im sticking to the facts and science instead of CIA fairy-tales.
Last edited:
ax1
Legend
Give it up bro, 9/11 was with absolute certainty backed by science an inside job. Other than that, 9/11 was yesterday, today is 2/1 and Im tired, LOL
ax1
Legend
Invalid Link Removed
Jiigzz
Legend
The video above is a simulation based on data from the flight data recorder. It just mimics the exact inputs made during flight by the pilots.
In Sully, they used mock simulations to try prove that a landing could have been made at an alternate airport, as opposed to ditching in the water. They weren't simulations of the actual flight, they were simulations of other possible outcomes that the pilots could have taken. The problem about that is that the test pilots were given advance warning of a double engine flameout and knew the route they were meant to take which obviously neglects the unexpected nature of an emergency.
ax1
Legend
The immaculate mis[sile]ception.
It had to be the CIA, because the less proof you have means the more proof they did it.
Because those sneaky bastards are really good at fakery.
Invalid Link Removed
Jiigzz
Legend
One thing to consider is that the plane was moving at 850km/hr, and security cameras in 2001 probably capture at like 30fps, if that.
I'm no expert on that, but i would imagine that kind of speed at that kind of capture would give you a frame or less of footage of the actual plane unless the camera was pointed in the direction the plane was traveling.
If you've ever seen video footage of a helicopters rotors you'll understand what i mean. A lot of cameras will make it seem like the rotors are barely moving, given the frame rate of capture vs the speed of the rotor.
I'm no expert on that, but i would imagine that kind of speed at that kind of capture would give you a frame or less of footage of the actual plane unless the camera was pointed in the direction the plane was traveling.
If you've ever seen video footage of a helicopters rotors you'll understand what i mean. A lot of cameras will make it seem like the rotors are barely moving, given the frame rate of capture vs the speed of the rotor.
thebigt
Legend
isn't that their job?The immaculate mis[sile]ception.
It had to be the CIA, because the less proof you have means the more proof they did it.
Because those sneaky bastards are really good at fakery.
ax1
Legend
NYC is run like a separate country, Im grateful I chose not to move there when I was younger. I have family there though.
BamBam54
Well-known member
Ah, the classic "Bigfoot" gambit. Because we don't have any clear trail camera pics of bigfoot PROVES even more that he is smart and evasive to avoid these in the woods. Because we don't have any dead bigfoot bodies found PROVES even more that he is super healthy and lives far longer than us toxic humans. Etc. LOL
So by that same basis... the fact that 4 planes were hijacked and flown into buildings only proves even more that the CIA did it to conceal a missile strike into the double-secret stolen $2.3 trillion evidence and steal gold. Their measley black ops budget can't possibly cover the costs of a space station with death ray laser gun! The CIA couldn't simply let a real missile loose to destroy the evidence. They needed the missile strike to look exactly like a plane flew into the building... so they hijacked multiple planes as a perfect cover using expert CIA pilots posing as muslim terrorists who attended a few days of flight school pretending to learn how to fly. With dozens of demolition experts prewiring the buildings to blow as soon as the planes hit. And when the passengers from Flight 93 tried to storm the cabin, a nearby military jet blew it out of the sky to hide their covert operation. Do I have that about right???
Why not just use the CIA laser death ray from their secret military space station to destroy the evidence, and make it look like an accidental lightning strike?
ax1
Legend
Ah, the classic "Bigfoot" gambit. Because we don't have any clear trail camera pics of bigfoot PROVES even more that he is smart and evasive to avoid these in the woods. Because we don't have any dead bigfoot bodies found PROVES even more that he is super healthy and lives far longer than us toxic humans. Etc. LOL
So by that same basis... the fact that 4 planes were hijacked and flown into buildings only proves even more that the CIA did it to conceal a missile strike into the double-secret stolen $2.3 trillion evidence and steal gold. Their measley black ops budget can't possibly cover the costs of a space station with death ray laser gun! The CIA couldn't simply let a real missile loose to destroy the evidence. They needed the missile strike to look exactly like a plane flew into the building... so they hijacked multiple planes as a perfect cover using expert CIA pilots posing as muslim terrorists who attended a few days of flight school pretending to learn how to fly. With dozens of demolition experts prewiring the buildings to blow as soon as the planes hit. And when the passengers from Flight 93 tried to storm the cabin, a nearby military jet blew it out of the sky to hide their covert operation. Do I have that about right???
Why not just use the CIA laser death ray from their secret military space station to destroy the evidence, and make it look like an accidental lightning strike?
Invalid Link Removed
thebigt
Legend
i am more concerned with coincidence.....on the 10th rumsfeld says they have located where the info on the $2,3 trillion is stored.Ah, the classic "Bigfoot" gambit. Because we don't have any clear trail camera pics of bigfoot PROVES even more that he is smart and evasive to avoid these in the woods. Because we don't have any dead bigfoot bodies found PROVES even more that he is super healthy and lives far longer than us toxic humans. Etc. LOL
So by that same basis... the fact that 4 planes were hijacked and flown into buildings only proves even more that the CIA did it to conceal a missile strike into the double-secret stolen $2.3 trillion evidence and steal gold. Their measley black ops budget can't possibly cover the costs of a space station with death ray laser gun! The CIA couldn't simply let a real missile loose to destroy the evidence. They needed the missile strike to look exactly like a plane flew into the building... so they hijacked multiple planes as a perfect cover using expert CIA pilots posing as muslim terrorists who attended a few days of flight school pretending to learn how to fly. With dozens of demolition experts prewiring the buildings to blow as soon as the planes hit. And when the passengers from Flight 93 tried to storm the cabin, a nearby military jet blew it out of the sky to hide their covert operation. Do I have that about right???
Why not just use the CIA laser death ray from their secret military space station to destroy the evidence, and make it look like an accidental lightning strike?
on the 11th the very same very small area of the humongous pentagon where this info is stored is destroyed.
consider that the pentagon is 17.5 miles of corridors-what are the odds of that small area being the exact area that was destroyed the very next day...by my calculations the odds of this happening are 2.3 trillion to 1....if you are a betting man you wouldn't want those odds-eh?
ax1
Legend
I starting to believe BamBam is contracted with Operation Mockingbird.
ax1
Legend
LMFAO, it is impossible to fly into the Capital's airspace without getting shot out. And they werent even the first hit. They knew whatever it was was coming, and thats more than 50 miles out. War jets were scrambled out into the Atlantic.
I cant believe people believe these fairy-tales.
I mean, its possible it was a plane flown remotely, I doubt it but possible but impossible to get it where they got it unless they let them, and the man who let them on record is CokDock Cheney.
ax1
Legend
AMALGAM VIRGO 01
From June 2001, preperations for airborn defense including hijacking crashing into the capital.
And guess who they invisioned for the hijacking? Obobo Bin Roddin!
And RIP Bill Cooper, and people wonder how he detailed that they were months away from launching the biggest strike on American soil in history and point their fingers at Obobo Bin Roddin.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
ax1
Legend
Repost with updated video, found a much better and shorter one.
The Radio case that had Bill Cooper assassinated by the Feds
June 28 2001
Bill Coopers accurate prediction how Osama Bin Laden was used as the CIA trained patsy for the twin towers attack by the us government
Invalid Link Removed
The Radio case that had Bill Cooper assassinated by the Feds
June 28 2001
Bill Coopers accurate prediction how Osama Bin Laden was used as the CIA trained patsy for the twin towers attack by the us government
Invalid Link Removed
ax1
Legend
Yes, he is CIA, he is also Vanderbuilt family. Talk about privileged...
BamBam54
Well-known member
Inside job, outside job. Millions, billions, or trillions stolen.... THAT is not my point of contention.
I am only saying that a big ass plane called Flight 77 hit the pentagon. It was not a missile. There is no evidence of a missile, no pieces or parts, no missile launched or tracked, no missile in any inventory that makes a hole that big around and that deep.
And whatever CIA double secret plot you imagine is fine, as long as it includes a Boeing 757 slamming into the Pentagon at the end. Because that is what happened.
I am only saying that a big ass plane called Flight 77 hit the pentagon. It was not a missile. There is no evidence of a missile, no pieces or parts, no missile launched or tracked, no missile in any inventory that makes a hole that big around and that deep.
And whatever CIA double secret plot you imagine is fine, as long as it includes a Boeing 757 slamming into the Pentagon at the end. Because that is what happened.
ax1
Legend
I already said it was possible a plane hit it, but there is little to no evidence of a plane hitting it either, I see no plane, not hitting it and not inside the teeny little hole, and thats that.
Until then Ill lean to stick with the 200+ pilots and aviation experts and trust them that some caveman who learned to fly RC planes without landing them can manuever a jumbo jet the way they did that day.
Its all about science and facts, no room for more fairy-tales.
Nobody is going to win here until a full independent investigation on top of full government transparency advances.
Last edited:
ax1
Legend
Last edited:
ax1
Legend
If you believe it’s a plane you do believe it was flown with robotics right? At least? You surely don’t believe some caveman who trained to fly a paperweight and not even learn to land pull that off what professional jumbo pilots can’t right?
Come on man, give me some tin foil.
BamBam54
Well-known member
100% sure it was a plane... THAT plane, flight 77, that was hijacked and flown into the Pentagon. No other viable option was ever presented with any kind of evidence or explanation.
Even if you want to doubt the plane, you would then have to come up with something else to cause that damage AND explain where the very real Flight 77 plane went instead. Impossible.
But following your theory of an inside job, I don't think robotics. Because we had actual hijackers who took over the plane. If using non-expert pilot hijackers you would have to steer them into the specific plane outfitted with robotics. Possible, but overly complicated.
A better guess (it seems to me) would be that the hijackers were far more experienced than presumed. Making the lead pilot the CIA controlled agent.
Not likely a CIA direct agent because how are you going to get him to do a suicide flight. But maybe a terrorist (cia asset) that they guide/train and allow/help accomplish the mission they needed.
That's all the tinfoil I can come up with, given the fixed and known variables...
Even if you want to doubt the plane, you would then have to come up with something else to cause that damage AND explain where the very real Flight 77 plane went instead. Impossible.
But following your theory of an inside job, I don't think robotics. Because we had actual hijackers who took over the plane. If using non-expert pilot hijackers you would have to steer them into the specific plane outfitted with robotics. Possible, but overly complicated.
A better guess (it seems to me) would be that the hijackers were far more experienced than presumed. Making the lead pilot the CIA controlled agent.
Not likely a CIA direct agent because how are you going to get him to do a suicide flight. But maybe a terrorist (cia asset) that they guide/train and allow/help accomplish the mission they needed.
That's all the tinfoil I can come up with, given the fixed and known variables...
thebigt
Legend
does this mean you concede the fact that it defies logic to think that the day after rumsfeld said a small storage area at the pentagon held the only evidence of where $2.3 trillion was held was destroyed the very next day....to think that in a building as large as the pentagon the small area where that info was stored was destroyed the very next day, and nothing more was ever said?????
as a example-the pentagon has 17.5 miles of corridors, where i come from that is pretty darned big!!!!
thebigt
Legend
remember lee harvey oswald and the 'magic bullet'?
thebigt
Legend
i think the real smoking gun is that $2.3 trillion....today a $trillion gets thrown around like petty cash, but back then it was a whole lotta money!!!!
BamBam54
Well-known member
BigT - I don't know enough about govt corruption to weigh in on it. I don't really know if the trillions story is accurate, what was held where, or why... and what ever became of it.
I only know construction (with a B.A.E. degree from Penn State) and some weapons systems stuff (as a Marine).
I have no opinion on the significance of WHERE the plane hit the pentagon.
Only saying with absolute certainty that a plane (flight 77) did in fact hit the pentagon plowing a giant hole some 12-16ft in diameter and 300 feet deep into the building.
WHY that happened and who arranged it (or let it happen) is for you guys to ponder... with the baby dinosaur.
BamBam54
Well-known member
Here is a good video on building demolition with explosives. CDI are some of the top guys in that field.
If you have full sound recorded, you always hear numerous loud booms in rapid fire as the charges go off in sequence to 'guide' the collapse.
Was there audio of rapid fire explosions like this prior to WTC7 coming down??
Invalid Link Removed
If you have full sound recorded, you always hear numerous loud booms in rapid fire as the charges go off in sequence to 'guide' the collapse.
Was there audio of rapid fire explosions like this prior to WTC7 coming down??
Invalid Link Removed