thebigt
Legend
wow...color me surprised...i could set my clock with your predictabilityThis is one battle you absolutely will not win haha. Fwiw I'm with you
wow...color me surprised...i could set my clock with your predictabilityThis is one battle you absolutely will not win haha. Fwiw I'm with you
This is one battle you absolutely will not win haha. Fwiw I'm with you
JFK running a close 2nd for me....Out of all the battles I fought on this forum, the one I wish I lost the most was the 9/11 one.
What a frustrating conversation.
The facts are these. Businesses have a staffing budget. An increase in the minimum wage will automatically result in a reduction in workforce. A fast food restaurant that employs ten people at $8/hr will be forced to immediately lay off about four of those ten if they are forced to pay $15/hr. In order to rehire those four people, their revenue will have to increase dramatically.
Now, in an economy that has a relatively high average starting wage, say $13/hr, the rise to $15 will result in a relatively small reduction in workforce. In small towns with low cost of living, raising the minimum wage to $15 would be catastrophic. It may end the towns existence.
Minimum wage should be a state, or even a municipal issue. The economic realities even within a small geographical area can be wildly divergent, so a mandate enforced nationwide is a bad idea.
I hold a degree in Economics, by the way.
you are forgetting that the companies that will move starting wage from $13 to $15 will now have to pay more experienced employees who were making $15 a increase to $17 and on up the ladder.What a frustrating conversation.
The facts are these. Businesses have a staffing budget. An increase in the minimum wage will automatically result in a reduction in workforce. A fast food restaurant that employs ten people at $8/hr will be forced to immediately lay off about four of those ten if they are forced to pay $15/hr. In order to rehire those four people, their revenue will have to increase dramatically.
Now, in an economy that has a relatively high average starting wage, say $13/hr, the rise to $15 will result in a relatively small reduction in workforce. In small towns with low cost of living, raising the minimum wage to $15 would be catastrophic. It may end the towns existence.
Minimum wage should be a state, or even a municipal issue. The economic realities even within a small geographical area can be wildly divergent, so a mandate enforced nationwide is a bad idea.
I hold a degree in Economics, by the way.
We would hope that would happen, but companies may just force the slightly higher paid employees to eat it, so to speak.you are forgetting that the companies that will move starting wage from $13 to $15 will now have to pay more experienced employees who were making $15 a increase to $17 and on up the ladder.
numbers and statistics have become almost worthless---it's like a good accountant doing creative accounting, the only ones who know it's faulty are other accountants and if all accountants are in the game....To Jiigzz point about inflation; he is absolutely right. The methods used to calculate inflation are absolutely asinine. The CPI is manipulated by replacing goods that are increasing in cost with inferior alternatives to show no inflation. EG, replacing sirlion steak with chuck roast, and then replacing chuck roast with ground beef in order to show no inflation in beef. We all know that the cost of food, power, housing, etc are rising. The government manipulates the numbers.
Precisely.numbers and statistics have become almost worthless---it's like a good accountant doing creative accounting, the only ones who know it's faulty are other accountants and if all accountants are in the game....![]()
We would hope that would happen, but companies may just force the slightly higher paid employees to eat it, so to speak.
Point taken. I must say, however, that I have yet to encounter a company that wouldn't rather force employees to do things they they don't want to do, or fire them, than do what is right by them. Then again, I haven't worked for a corporation that requires a workforce with highly specific skillsets.yeah right, i know how well that would work, i spent a lot of years working for muti-national corporation...the whole thing relies on trained, experienced people showing new hires 'the ropes' so to speak.
To Jiigzz point about inflation; he is absolutely right. The methods used to calculate inflation are absolutely asinine. The CPI is manipulated by replacing goods that are increasing in cost with inferior alternatives to show no inflation. EG, replacing sirlion steak with chuck roast, and then replacing chuck roast with ground beef in order to show no inflation in beef. We all know that the cost of food, power, housing, etc are rising. The government manipulates the numbers.
Yes, the extreme dilution of the money supply will inevitably lead to hyperinflation. Our saving grace to this point is that the vast majority of that currency is being handed off to the top banks, corporations, etc., who are using it to consolidate their holdings and pump up the stock market.What are your thoughts of quantitative easing, and the additional trillions being printed out of thin air with the bailout packages? Do you think this is going to hit inflation hard soon?
Yes, the extreme dilution of the money supply will inevitably lead to hyperinflation. Our saving grace to this point is that the vast majority of that currency is being handed off to the top banks, corporations, etc., who are using it to consolidate their holdings and pump up the stock market.
In short, we the "cattle" are left to tread water while the "elite" perfect their systems of control. I believe that when they are ready, they will release a flood of currency carefully calibrated to destroy our purchasing power while simultaneously ensuring the collapse of the dollar and necessitating the establishment of the global digital currency.
China is the globalist model, in terms of censorship, surveillance, the social credit system, etc. The funny thing is, I don't think China will have much power when the globalists complete their plan. I tend to think that China and the U.S. will be forced into a war that will damage both significantly. I think the power center will return to Europe.Its a matter of time we are a cashless society, everything will be tracked and black markets will have to use other methods of transaction such as bitcoin, monero, etherum, etc...until they crack down on that, if they can.
I missed out on China last year, but the year before when I went they have gone so cashless people give you funny looks when you pull out cash. They all mostly pay using wechat. Even sidewalk vendors prefer wechat....cash is still used but it totally changed in China.
Anyways, not trying to brag about my awesome experiences in China, the point is China is a testing ground for America's future oppression.
I'd say in the US this absolutely needs to be considered. It should be region specific.What a frustrating conversation.
The facts are these. Businesses have a staffing budget. An increase in the minimum wage will automatically result in a reduction in workforce. A fast food restaurant that employs ten people at $8/hr will be forced to immediately lay off about four of those ten if they are forced to pay $15/hr. In order to rehire those four people, their revenue will have to increase dramatically.
Now, in an economy that has a relatively high average starting wage, say $13/hr, the rise to $15 will result in a relatively small reduction in workforce. In small towns with low cost of living, raising the minimum wage to $15 would be catastrophic. It may end the towns existence.
Minimum wage should be a state, or even a municipal issue. The economic realities even within a small geographical area can be wildly divergent, so a mandate enforced nationwide is a bad idea.
I hold a degree in Economics, by the way.
China is the globalist model, in terms of censorship, surveillance, the social credit system, etc. The funny thing is, I don't think China will have much power when the globalists complete their plan. I tend to think that China and the U.S. will be forced into a war that will damage both significantly. I think the power center will return to Europe.
I am afraid that the cryptocurrencies will not be viable during the post cash era. First, you will need to have access to electronics, which will hardly be a certainty in the future. Second, the cryptos all use block chain, so all of your activity would be completely tracable when the regime gains access to the records, which they will.
I believe the govt can exploit situations to their benefit, but I don't necessarily believe that they cause those situations.wow...color me surprised...i could set my clock with your predictability![]()
i worked for international paper...you hire in at a low skill set job, in order to move up you need to bid on a job opening. if your bid is successful you are given a set amount of time to become qualified to do that job, this requires someone qualified to do that skill set to train you. the policy when i worked at international paper was if you bid on a job and are unable to get qualified for that job in a set amount of time you are terminated.Point taken. I must say, however, that I have yet to encounter a company that wouldn't rather force employees to do things they they don't want to do, or fire them, than do what is right by them. Then again, I haven't worked for a corporation that requires a workforce with highly specific skillsets.
so you believe that rumsfeld said all the info on wherabouts of $2.3 trillion is in a small storage area area at the pentagon...and the very next day out of the 17.5 miles of corridors at the pentagon the exact, small storage area where this info was contained was destroyed by a plane crashing into it????????I believe the govt can exploit situations to their benefit, but I don't necessarily believe that they cause those situations.
IMO, Occams Razor applies. The amount of people who would need to be willing to kill thousands of their own countrymen and prepare to lie about it is astronomical. And it would require to multiple organizations and thousands of individuals to keep it a secret.
To me, there is far more to be made by someone to divulge all that information (think of the payday) than to keep it a secret so that the govt benefits? Who would want to kill 3000+ people so that the govt could make money disappear? Some people perhaps, but as many people that would be required to launch a missile into the pentagon, for the NTSB to investigate and pretend it was a plane, for all the families that have loved ones who died on the flight etc just doesn't make sense
biden is on record as for the new world order....I think Monero is the secure one that government hates the most, but I would do more research before using that since I havent spent alot of time looking into it.
I think you may be right on with Europe....the unelected corrupt bureaucrats thugs that run the EU will, and they now have their own anthem and building their own military.
Invalid Link Removed
That is a unique set up. I can see how that could make it difficult to screw over the more experienced employees.i worked for international paper...you hire in at a low skill set job, in order to move up you need to bid on a job opening. if your bid is successful you are given a set amount of time to become qualified to do that job, this requires someone qualified to do that skill set to train you. the policy when i worked at international paper was if you bid on a job and are unable to get qualified for that job in a set amount of time you are terminated.
c'mon man...corporations pay the most and have the best benefits, they can afford a ton of write offs. it's the small businesses that can't afford to pay higher wages or benefits...at the same time if you raised minimum wage to $20 tomorrow corporations would survive, but it would destroy small business.I'd say in the US this absolutely needs to be considered. It should be region specific.
Arguing an increase to $15 by 2025 is not unrealistic, providing the jump doesn't happen all at once. But again, the US is so diverse that it should absolutely be based on living wage.
Problem is, people expect the free market to pay a fair wage without regulation (Lol), but the reality is is that employers will exploit you for all your worth (a reason why companies hate unions).
The fact that mega corps still pay below a living wage is bizarre. Powerful companies can use the tactic of "take it or leave it" knowing that people will fight for roles within prestigious companies at almost cost.
It's a balancing act of what companies can realistically afford vs paying people enough to not need to sell their bodies afterward.
Should the minimum wage extend to school-age children in their first job or whatever? Maybe that could be argued.
actually i can't imagine any work place where the older, more experienced employees would not be able to sabotage new hires or at least make their lives a living hell...seriously, a disgruntled workforce would have a lot of disadvantages for employers no matter the skill set---the only way i could see this happening is a small business that is forced by economics to not increase wages of older, more experienced employees to meet minimum wage requirement of new hires.That is a unique set up. I can see how that could make it difficult to screw over the more experienced employees.
There are in point of fact thousands of structural engineers who have stated that the buildings could not possibly have collapsed in the manner they did due to aircraft strikes.I believe the govt can exploit situations to their benefit, but I don't necessarily believe that they cause those situations.
IMO, Occams Razor applies. The amount of people who would need to be willing to kill thousands of their own countrymen and prepare to lie about it is astronomical. And it would require to multiple organizations and thousands of individuals to keep it a secret.
To me, there is far more to be made by someone to divulge all that information (think of the payday) than to keep it a secret so that the govt benefits? Who would want to kill 3000+ people so that the govt could make money disappear? Some people perhaps, but as many people that would be required to launch a missile into the pentagon, for the NTSB to investigate and pretend it was a plane, for all the families that have loved ones who died on the flight etc just doesn't make sense
you mean like the magic bullet?..... but i digress---great post!!!There are in point of fact thousands of structural engineers who have stated that the buildings could not possibly have collapsed in the manner they did due to aircraft strikes.
As ax1 points out, there are dozens of experienced heavy bird pilots who say that they could not have pulled off those strikes, and no pilot whose only flight hours were on Cessnas could even fly a Boeing airliner.
Cellular communication technicians will tell you that cellular phones in 2001 were incapable of connecting the calls that were recorded that day.
I think you underestimated the extreme compartmentalization extant in government, and the effectiveness of threatening people's pensions (or worse) to keep them silent.
I appreciate the Occam's Razor argument. However, accepting the official narrative requires us to accept impossibilities. I don't know what happened that day, but I know it cannot have happened in the manner we were told.
Yes, you are right. I will say that I work for a major general aviation company, and that management hasn't been particularly responsive to issues resulting in disgruntled workers.actually i can't imagine any work place where the older, more experienced employees would not be able to sabotage new hires or at least make their lives a living hell...seriously, a disgruntled workforce would have a lot of disadvantages for employers no matter the skill set---the only way i could see this happening is a small business that is forced by economics to not increase wages of older, more experienced employees to meet minimum wage requirement of new hires.
I believe the govt can exploit situations to their benefit, but I don't necessarily believe that they cause those situations.
IMO, Occams Razor applies. The amount of people who would need to be willing to kill thousands of their own countrymen and prepare to lie about it is astronomical. And it would require to multiple organizations and thousands of individuals to keep it a secret.
To me, there is far more to be made by someone to divulge all that information (think of the payday) than to keep it a secret so that the govt benefits? Who would want to kill 3000+ people so that the govt could make money disappear? Some people perhaps, but as many people that would be required to launch a missile into the pentagon, for the NTSB to investigate and pretend it was a plane, for all the families that have loved ones who died on the flight etc just doesn't make sense
c'mon man...corporations pay the most and have the best benefits, they can afford a ton of write offs. it's the small businesses that can't afford to pay higher wages or benefits...at the same time if you raised minimum wage to $20 tomorrow corporations would survive, but it would destroy small business.
of course retail chains like walmart pay crap at the stores but pay decent money if you work in distribution centers, i know this because i actually know people who work at theses places. i think target raised their starting pay to $15 last year.
i highly doubt those issues are regarding minimum wage though....corporations will sometimes cut off their own nose to save face!!!Yes, you are right. I will say that I work for a major general aviation company, and that management hasn't been particularly responsive to issues resulting in disgruntled workers.
This is an aspect of the consolidation I spoke of in my reply to Ax1 regarding hyperinflation. Multi-national corporations can afford to pay their people $15/hr, many small businesses cannot. This will allow the big fish to buy up the little, further consolidating industries that are already perilously close to monopolistic.c'mon man...corporations pay the most and have the best benefits, they can afford a ton of write offs. it's the small businesses that can't afford to pay higher wages or benefits...at the same time if you raised minimum wage to $20 tomorrow corporations would survive, but it would destroy small business.
of course retail chains like walmart pay crap at the stores but pay decent money if you work in distribution centers, i know this because i actually know people who work at theses places. i think target raised their starting pay to $15 last year.
exactly!!!!This is an aspect of the consolidation I spoke of in my reply to Ax1 regarding hyperinflation. Multi-national corporations can afford to pay their people $15/hr, many small businesses cannot. This will allow the big fish to buy up the little, further consolidating industries that are already perilously close to monopolistic.
If you look at the distribution of the loans that were made available to "small businesses" in the first COVID-19 relief package, you will find that very little actually went to small businesses. Most of the money went to large corporations. Even if you assume that the politicians who drafted the legislation had the best of intentions, the bureaucrats that administered the loan program did not carry those intentions out.
Anyone wanna get in on this silver run and squeeze the billionaires that are manipulating the silver market?!
Invalid Link Removed
And yes 9/11 was a blatant demolition.
I happen to have an account set up to aquire SLV upon market open tomorrow morning.I was waiting for you to say something after all those likes, and your to the point, I love it! LOL
I just heard about silver an hour ago, trying to figure out how to gamble some extra cash I can afford to lose. This is all new to me.
I happen to have an account set up to aquire SLV upon market open tomorrow morning.
I was waiting for you to say something after all those likes, and your to the point, I love it! LOL
I just heard about silver an hour ago, trying to figure out how to gamble some extra cash I can afford to lose. This is all new to me.

If the bullion banks are seriously hurt on their paper shorts, physical may ascend to its proper supply based price. The few hundred ounces I have tucked away may make a serious dent in eliminating my mortgage.Cross our fingers it does a GameStop haha. Silver gonna be a lot harder to squeeze but looks like there is some momentum already
Yeah man you posted all the picture perfect evidence so I have nothing else to add. Wait, did you talk about the thermite dust found all over downtown and the fires that burned for 2 months underground? Or was that left over “jet fuel”
Invalid Link Removed
what is it now, around $24 a oz?If the bullion banks are seriously hurt on their paper shorts, physical may ascend to its proper supply based price. The few hundred ounces I have tucked away may make a serious dent in eliminating my mortgage.
Around $28/oz.what is it now, around $24 a oz?
I happen to have an account set up to aquire SLV upon market open tomorrow morning.