Donald Trump running for president

omg...just found a great version of NO TIME-[1992] ringo starr and burton cummings.

for those of you who don't know burton cummings was lead singer for the guess who.
 
thebigt said:
trump is still president...and you are still not!!!
Click to expand...
"If it doesn't blow, you can forget about television for that night," Trump said.
" 'Darling, I want to watch television.' 'I'm sorry! The wind isn't blowing.' I know a lot about wind," Trump added.

Actually, he is a windbag so I guess he does know a bit about wind
 
Jiigzz said:
FAKE NEWS. My guess is you got this from the the Trump media machine known as Fox.

President Obama did not encourage undocumented immigrants to vote. Dozens of YouTube channels are running with an interview clip that, they allege, shows the president urging noncitizens to vote illegally. In fact, as Obama makes clear at three different points in the 30-second clip, he’s speaking not to undocumented immigrants, but to their U.S.-born or naturalized children — who can and should legally vote, because they’re U.S. citizens.

Invalid Link Removed

"Many of the outrage posts were written around a video in which the majority of the president’s response was edited out to give the misleading impression that Obama was urging undocumented immigrants to vote illegally"

Look at that, people editing out the truth because it's all they have. Noone has to edit Trump to create a lie, he does that all by himself. He lies 3x to every 1 half truth
Click to expand...

Maybe you should look up the original video for the Trump speech as well, and apply similar leniency in interpretation.

His point is clear in the speech that you cannot rely on the system when all of these votes are being dumped by the post office and he explains that if you mail in your vote and then go vote in person, and the system works, it will only be counted once but "you can't let your vote be taken away from you because these people are playing dirty politics."

So he was right? The system worked and 1000 people were counted once.

But wait, now we are talking fake news about Obama? I thought that was just something Trump made up.
 
HIT4ME said:
Maybe you should look up the original video for the Trump speech as well, and apply similar leniency in interpretation.

His point is clear in the speech that you cannot rely on the system when all of these votes are being dumped by the post office and he explains that if you mail in your vote and then go vote in person, and the system works, it will only be counted once but "you can't let your vote be taken away from you because these people are playing dirty politics."

So he was right? The system worked and 1000 people were counted once.

But wait, now we are talking fake news about Obama? I thought that was just something Trump made up.
Click to expand...
If his point is so clear, why has it violated both Facebook's and Twitters terms of services for spreading misinformation?
 
Jiigzz said:
If his point is so clear, why has it violated both Facebook's and Twitters terms of services for spreading misinformation?
Click to expand...

RRROOFFLLLLLL Are you the last person on earth who isnt aware of the biases of Silicon Valley and the tech world? They freaking get together in secret and plot this krap on opposition views.
 
ax1 said:
RRROOFFLLLLLL Are you the last person on earth who isnt aware of the biases of Silicon Valley and the tech world? They freaking get together in secret and plot this krap on opposition views.
Click to expand...
I'm out of tin foil, can I use some of yours?

Are we also forgetting that these companies were pivotal in him being elected?

A Facebook exec has stated that Trump ran the best digital campaign ever seen and that this was a major factor in his election. Credit where it is due, he saw value in the platforms and capitalised on it
 
Jiigzz said:
I'm out of tin foil, can I use some of yours?

Are we also forgetting that these companies were pivotal in him being elected?

A Facebook exec has stated that Trump ran the best digital campaign ever seen and that this was a major factor in his election. Credit where it is due, he saw value in the platforms and capitalised on it
Click to expand...

All elections are pivitol into being elected by tech,

But, are we also fogetting Hitlery spent over a billion dollars in 2016, the most in the history of elections and still lost? Yeah sure the Soviets but 10k in facebook ads, big deal.

Dump won the election because Hitlery is a satanic evil witch who defends child rapists and half the country is really tired of the cancel politically correct culture.

Now Dems gonna blow it again because they picked a over the hill geezer who pretends to be liberal but is as much of the swamp as you can possibly get.
 
Jiigzz said:
I'm out of tin foil, can I use some of yours?

Are we also forgetting that these companies were pivotal in him being elected?

A Facebook exec has stated that Trump ran the best digital campaign ever seen and that this was a major factor in his election. Credit where it is due, he saw value in the platforms and capitalised on it
Click to expand...
exactly...and now they are anti-trump to appease the libbies.

just like when james comey was accused by hillary of being the reason why she lost---he then went all apeshyt anti-trump...

you notice a trend?
 
ax1 said:
All elections are pivitol into being elected.

But, are we also fogetting Hitlery spent over a billion dollars in 2016, the most in the history of elections and still lost? Yeah sure the Soviets but 10k in facebook ads, big deal.

Dump won the election because Hitlery is a satanic evil witch who defends child rapists and half the country is really tired of the cancel politically correct culture.

Now Dems gonna blow it again because they picked a over the hill geezer who pretends to be liberal but is as much of the swamp as you can possibly get.
Click to expand...
Trump spent 44 million on ads, and ran 5.9 million different ads, all whilst being meticulous and killing non-performers and testing and tweaking all variants.

It was incredibly sophisticated and well oiled. Hillary spent 20 million, but only ran 66,000 different ads. Didnt optimise a thing.
 
Jiigzz said:
If his point is so clear, why has it violated both Facebook's and Twitters terms of services for spreading misinformation?
Click to expand...

No, seriously. Do you really mean this?

Was saying that if you mail in a vote and then go in person to vote, if the system works the second vote will not be counted? That is now misinformation? Because I thought a couple weeks ago the dems were saying it wasn't possible that votes could be counted twice? Or are you worried that he aas right in the beginning and they actually will be counted twice?

But seriously? Facebook is now the apex of truth? What next? Reddit?

Why don't you just ask, "If the point is so clear, why aren't the Chinese helping to spread the word?"

Jiigzz said:
I'm out of tin foil, can I use some of yours?

Are we also forgetting that these companies were pivotal in him being elected?

A Facebook exec has stated that Trump ran the best digital campaign ever seen and that this was a major factor in his election. Credit where it is due, he saw value in the platforms and capitalised on it
Click to expand...

If he used a system to his advantage, it doesn't mean the system was rooting for him. I think it is pretty clear, since his election caused them to create all kinds of new rules, and ways to control the content on their platform - including the one you just pointed out. You think they did all that because they were rooting for him and happy he played them and won?

Just so you know, if it wasn't you I probably wouldn't even respond to someone who used "Well, well, Facebook!" As their main argument.
 
Jiigzz said:
Trump spent 44 million on ads, and ran 5.9 million different ads, all whilst being meticulous and killing non-performers and testing and tweaking all variants.

It was incredibly sophisticated and well oiled. Hillary spent 20 million, but only ran 66,000 different ads. Didnt optimise a thing.
Click to expand...

So you mad because Dump is smarter than you thought he was?
 
thebigt said:
exactly...and now they are anti-trump to appease the libbies.

just like when james comey was accused by hillary of being the reason why she lost---he then went all apeshyt anti-trump...

you notice a trend?
Click to expand...
They're not anti Trump, they're finally enforcing their policies on the President and trying to fight misinformation.

It's a weak attempt, considering how much other stuff still filters through with no issue, but they're ramping up their response against stuff that either has been interpreted to promote violence or undermine election results.

I'm all for fighting misinformation as social media platforms spread it like a virus. It's so easy to photoshop anything, edit things and create blatant lies now, and efforts should be taken to maintain integrity
 
Jiigzz said:
Trump spent 44 million on ads, and ran 5.9 million different ads, all whilst being meticulous and killing non-performers and testing and tweaking all variants.

It was incredibly sophisticated and well oiled. Hillary spent 20 million, but only ran 66,000 different ads. Didnt optimise a thing.
Click to expand...

Even if Dump spent 10 billion of facebook ads and Hitlery spent only a few buckets of witch soup doesnt make it right for Facebook and other companies to be political thought police and the beacons of truth. And to be clear, I said it "doesnt make it right" I never said they cant do whatever they want with their private companies.
 
Jiigzz said:
They're not anti Trump, they're finally enforcing their policies on the President and trying to fight misinformation.

It's a weak attempt, considering how much other stuff still filters through with no issue, but they're ramping up their response against stuff that either has been interpreted to promote violence or undermine election results.

I'm all for fighting misinformation as social media platforms spread it like a virus. It's so easy to photoshop anything, edit things and create blatant lies now, and efforts should be taken to maintain integrity
Click to expand...

If they wanted to respond against violence then they would be filtering out Antifa, BLM, and anybody suggesting the idea of blindly defunding our police....basically the current demican party as a whole should be filtered out.
 
Jiigzz said:
They're not anti Trump, they're finally enforcing their policies on the President and trying to fight misinformation.

It's a weak attempt, considering how much other stuff still filters through with no issue, but they're ramping up their response against stuff that either has been interpreted to promote violence or undermine election results.

I'm all for fighting misinformation as social media platforms spread it like a virus. It's so easy to photoshop anything, edit things and create blatant lies now, and efforts should be taken to maintain integrity
Click to expand...
yes, THEY ARE ANTI-TRUMP.....all of silicon valley is anti-trump.

do you know who andrew bosworth is-look him up.

'facebook exec andrew bosworth-i don't want trump to win'.....
 
Invalid Link Removed
 
Jiigzz said:
They're not anti Trump, they're finally enforcing their policies on the President and trying to fight misinformation.

It's a weak attempt, considering how much other stuff still filters through with no issue, but they're ramping up their response against stuff that either has been interpreted to promote violence or undermine election results.

I'm all for fighting misinformation as social media platforms spread it like a virus. It's so easy to photoshop anything, edit things and create blatant lies now, and efforts should be taken to maintain integrity
Click to expand...

Regardless of what websites policies were violated, it has no bearing on what is true or not, right or wrong. I am just flabbergasted that you would look to Facebook to base your argument on.

Why don't you look at what Trump actually said and not just read the news articles? Just like you want us to do for Obama?
 
ax1 said:
Even if Dump spent 10 billion of facebook ads and Hitlery spent only a few buckets of witch soup doesnt make it right for Facebook and other companies to be political thought police and the beacons of truth. And to be clear, I said it "doesnt make it right" I never said they cant do whatever they want with their private companies.
Click to expand...
Except I would argue it has an obligation to maintain integrity, especially toward people in positions of influence in a platform they have clear policies on terms of use for.
 
thebigt said:
yes, THEY ARE ANTI-TRUMP.....all of silicon valley is anti-trump.

do you know who andrew bosworth is-look him up.

'facebook exec andrew bosworth-i don't want trump to win'.....
Click to expand...
This is what he said:

Facebook Exec: We Probably Got Trump Elected, and We Won’t Stop It From Happening Again
 
Jiigzz said:
This is what he said:

Facebook Exec: We Probably Got Trump Elected, and We Won’t Stop It From Happening Again
Click to expand...
read the whole freaking article---the guy is on record saying he doesn't want trump to win---geez!!!
 
thebigt said:
@Jiigzz
Click to expand...

Saying you don't want Trump to win is not anti Trump. Being anti someone is what you guys do in this thread every day "I hate Biden" etc. That's being anti.

He is still saying they won't stop him from running his campaigns on their platform despite not wanting him to win. That's integrity.
 
HIT4ME said:
Regardless of what websites policies were violated, it has no bearing on what is true or not, right or wrong. I am just flabbergasted that you would look to Facebook to base your argument on.

Why don't you look at what Trump actually said and not just read the news articles? Just like you want us to do for Obama?
Click to expand...

Because i've read what he said and, well, it still promotes voting twice. At least I actually research both sides unlike the majority of people in this thread who are "I dont care, I hate Biden and Dems"
 
Jiigzz said:
Saying you don't want Trump to win is not anti Trump. Being anti someone is what you guys do in this thread every day "I hate Biden" etc. That's being anti.

He is still saying they won't stop him from running his campaigns on their platform despite not wanting him to win. That's integrity.
Click to expand...
you mean that is what he has to say-officially...did you look at what his position is?

zuckerberg is on record under oath saying facebook isn't biased, but his 2nd in command comes out and says he doesn't want trump to win?

andrew bosworth is in a position that he shouldn't be in if he is making statements like that, he is in charge of making sure there isn't bias, lol.
 
Jiigzz said:
Because i've read what he said and, well, it still promotes voting twice. At least I actually research both sides unlike the majority of people in this thread who are "I dont care, I hate Biden and Dems"
Click to expand...

take a guess and tell me why you think we would hate biden and dems?

i want to know what you think are the reason why we would hate biden and dems? @Jiigzz
 
Last edited:
Jiigzz said:
Except I would argue it has an obligation to maintain integrity, especially toward people in positions of influence in a platform they have clear policies on terms of use for.
Click to expand...

They pretend they do but they clearly over the years have not. Facekrack and Twishitter have no integrity.
 
thebigt said:
you mean that is what he has to say-officially...did you look at what his position is?

zuckerberg is on record under oath saying facebook isn't biased, but his 2nd in command comes out and says he doesn't want trump to win?

andrew bosworth is in a position that he shouldn't be in if he is making statements like that, he is in charge of making sure there isn't bias, lol.
Click to expand...
Does that matter though?

Bosworth has gone against employees of Facebook who published an open letter wanting to stop politicians using ads to promote their campaigns. That's in alignment with Zuckerberg who believes in a right to free speech, even if it goes against his best interests.

That's unbiased.

There are other important people who oppose Biden, that's the nature of democracy and they are free to say who they dont want and who they want. That doesnt mean anything untoward at all.
 
Jiigzz said:
Does that matter though?

Bosworth has gone against employees of Facebook who published an open letter wanting to stop politicians using ads to promote their campaigns. That's in alignment with Zuckerberg who believes in a right to free speech, even if it goes against his best interests.

That's unbiased.

There are other important people who oppose Biden, that's the nature of democracy and they are free to say who they dont want and who they want. That doesnt mean anything untoward at all.
Click to expand...
c'mon man...bosworth is the one in charge of making sure there isn't bias, and he is on record saying he doesn't want trump to win...surely you aren't that naive, lol.
 
Jiigzz said:
Trump spent 44 million on ads, and ran 5.9 million different ads, all whilst being meticulous and killing non-performers and testing and tweaking all variants.
Click to expand...

I ran into those same numbers, and keep in mind Hitlery and the Demicans instead of giving credit to Dumps well run smartly financed campaign, they blamed the russians...........the russians spent $100,000k in ads and then 10s of millions of our stolen tax dollars are spend investigating this and they still wont let it go LLLMMMMFFFFFOOOOOOO
 
Hillary Clinton
Total raised
$1.191 BILLION

Donald Trump
Total raised
$646.8 million
+
Joseph Stalin
Total Raised
one hundred thousand dollars

Yeah, it was the Soviets and KGB!!!!

RRRRROOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
thebigt said:
c'mon man...bosworth is the one in charge of making sure there isn't bias, and he is on record saying he doesn't want trump to win...surely you aren't that naive, lol.
Click to expand...
If he was to interfere, there are literally hundreds of employees who would notice. At least one of them would speak out.

Hes not the one sitting down and rewriting the entire code, there are lots of small focus groups that work on segments. It's nowhere near as easy as you are implying.
 
ax1 said:
Hillary Clinton
Total raised
$1.191 BILLION

Donald Trump
Total raised
$646.8 million
+
Joseph Stalin
Total Raised
one hundred thousand dollars

Yeah, it was the Soviets and KGB!!!!

RRRRROOOOOOOOOOFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
Has a relatively straightforward answer. Far more outreach than you are claiming

Invalid Link Removed
 
Jiigzz said:
Has a relatively straightforward answer. Far more outreach than you are claiming

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Come'on man, NPR???? You couldnt possibly use a more biased source.

Meuller is a low life corrupt piece of crap scum by the way. How you find the head of the FBI at the time of 9/11 and that coke head Bushy as a credible source is beyond my imagination.
 
Mr. Putin, can you help please elect Jo Jo for president this year?
 
When is NPR going to post articles about Israeli meddling in the elections? Or China? Or Saudi Arabia? etc.......

If Russia gave Hitlery or now Groper Joe a quadrillion zabillion godzillalilion dollars NPR wont show up.
 
ax1 said:
Come'on man, NPR???? You couldnt possibly use a more biased source.

Meuller is a low life corrupt piece of crap scum by the way. How you find the head of the FBI at the time of 9/11 and that coke head Bushy as a credible source is beyond my imagination.
Click to expand...
I find him more credible than 99% of the sources used ITT lol.

Read the report if you want the source.
 
Damn NBA, getting worse by the minute....

Steve Nash admits to benefiting from White privilege, saying he skipped the line to get head coaching job
Invalid Link Removed
 
Jiigzz said:
I find him more credible than 99% of the sources used ITT lol.

Read the report if you want the source.
Click to expand...

Before you trust the government, keep yourself safe and put on a cover first :)

Invalid Link Removed
 
I gotta remind you all, I dont even like Dump's policies and will never support him. But I just call things as I see it. It feels weird defending him simultaneously not supporting him, but I think for the most part people are primarily distracted with bogus nonsense and away from real policies that truly and really effect us all so I have to speak out.

Jo and Spike 2020!!!!!!
 
Trump knew Coronavirus was deadly and highly infectious in Feb:

There's a recorded interview, in case you were wondering.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Jiigzz said:
Trump knew Coronavirus was deadly and highly infectious in Feb:

There's a recorded interview, in case you were wondering.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

I think he was interested in getting that trade deal done more than anything, and thats why he was playing nice about Dictator Winnie of China around that time.
 
ax1 said:
I think he was interested in getting that trade deal done more than anything, and thats why he was playing nice about Dictator Winnie of China around that time.
Click to expand...
That wouldnt surprise me.

I did notice that hes up for a Nobel Peace Prize. That's interesting. He'll be up against Jacinda Ardern
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top