Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

Y’all catch trump trolling the press yesterday? He came to the podium and told the media he hoped they had a great time at THEIR convention last week
 
sammpedd88 said:
Maybe he just hates those cities and doesn’t visit them....next question.
Click to expand...

Those cities represent a majority of the US population. How can you say you hate the places most Americans live without, to some degree hating America?

Could it be that neither the left nor the right "hate America" but rather want to improve it?
 
nostrum420 said:
Those cities represent a majority of the US population. How can you say you hate the places most Americans live without, to some degree hating America?

Could it be that neither the left nor the right "hate America" but rather want to improve it?
Click to expand...

Burning it down is an improvement? Murdering future citizens is an improvement? Removing people’s ability to protect themselves is an improvement? How about someone’s beliefs that don’t align with the left, is silencing that an improvement?

Removing borders, removing flags, removing national identity, removing rights, removing religion, removing history...the left has a funny way of showing they just want to improve something.
 
nostrum420 said:
Those cities represent a majority of the US population. How can you say you hate the places most Americans live without, to some degree hating America?

Could it be that neither the left nor the right "hate America" but rather want to improve it?
Click to expand...

I pretty sure what he’s saying is he doesn’t like the way these cities are ran. For example Chicago, NYC and LA have been ran by Democrats for 4-6 decades at least and the cities have been ran into the ground. Blacks are no better off in these cities but they continue to vote Democrat. Democrats actually want blacks in the ghetto because it’s guaranteed votes for their party.

Do you see the difference now?
 
bosskardo said:
America's leading white supremacists is running for his 2nd term
Click to expand...

Serious question - what are you basing this statement on? Do you have any solid evidence he is a racist? Or is it just a feeling. Would live to see evidence.

We know for sure Biden is more racist than Trump, as he actively fought desegregation, sees poor kids as being non-white, thinks you are not black if you don't vote a certain way and then accuses the black community of having less diversity of thought than the Latino community. If he is less racist than Trump, I would be shocked. Show me some evidence.

sammpedd88 said:
I pretty sure what he’s saying is he doesn’t like the way these cities are ran. For example Chicago, NYC and LA have been ran by Democrats for 4-6 decades at least and the cities have been ran into the ground. Blacks are no better off in these cities but they continue to vote Democrat. Democrats actually want blacks in the ghetto because it’s guaranteed votes for their party.

Do you see the difference now?
Click to expand...

I don't know how anyone could vote for a party that is going to be more successful if things are going poorly. Get everyone on welfare, relying on the government, take control of their health...what are you going to do, vote your income, health and ability to survive away?
 
sammpedd88 said:
I pretty sure what he’s saying is he doesn’t like the way these cities are ran. For example Chicago, NYC and LA have been ran by Democrats for 4-6 decades at least and the cities have been ran into the ground. Blacks are no better off in these cities but they continue to vote Democrat. Democrats actually want blacks in the ghetto because it’s guaranteed votes for their party.

Do you see the difference now?
Click to expand...

Just to correct you since I consider NYC my home city (I didnt grow up there I live north,) It has been run by Demican mayor since 2014, and he is a communist type. Before that it was Mayor Doomberg who was an "I" and although he ran for Prez as Demican he was more of a normal human being which is a rarity these days for that party. Before Doomberg is was Mayor Rudy "inside job" Giuliani who really cleaned up the mess of previous Demican mayors, Dinkins, Koch and so on to cover a few decades.

But yeah its pure insanity there, and I do blame communist leaning Demicans.

Alot of NYC hates DeFalsio, there is a Defund Defalsio movement growing
Invalid Link Removed

And NYC certainly is turning to the shythole everybody hears about since Demicans took power, look at this NYC is turning into San Fransisco. Its the messy shythole Demicans left Mayor "inside job" Rudy before he cleaned up the mug.
Invalid Link Removed

196976
 
dixonk said:
Burning it down is an improvement? Murdering future citizens is an improvement? Removing people’s ability to protect themselves is an improvement? How about someone’s beliefs that don’t align with the left, is silencing that an improvement?

Removing borders, removing flags, removing national identity, removing rights, removing religion, removing history...the left has a funny way of showing they just want to improve something.
Click to expand...

A hardliner leftist could make a similar list about the right. It's all a matter of perspective.
 
sammpedd88 said:
I pretty sure what he’s saying is he doesn’t like the way these cities are ran. For example Chicago, NYC and LA have been ran by Democrats for 4-6 decades at least and the cities have been ran into the ground. Blacks are no better off in these cities but they continue to vote Democrat. Democrats actually want blacks in the ghetto because it’s guaranteed votes for their party.

Do you see the difference now?
Click to expand...

You refuse to acknowledge the analogy. Got it.
 
Invalid Link Removed
 
dixonk said:
Our list will never include burning down cities and murdering children. Ever.
Click to expand...

I’m assuming the murdering children refers to abortion - so, just curious. If all males had to have a vasectomy until they were married, would you be okay with that? There would be no need for abortions outside of medical emergencies (which is a real thing).
 
Woody said:
I’m assuming the murdering children refers to abortion - so, just curious. If all males had to have a vasectomy until they were married, would you be okay with that? There would be no need for abortions outside of medical emergencies (which is a real thing).
Click to expand...

Y’all can come up with whatever solution you feel fit. Murder as a form of birth control is not one of them.
 
dixonk said:
I didn’t say I had the solution to the problem of people acting irresponsible. All I said that murder as a form of birth control is not the answer.
Click to expand...

See you won’t answer because you know it’s not the governments business to tell you what to do with your cock.
 
Woody said:
See you won’t answer because you know it’s not the governments business to tell you what to do with your cock.
Click to expand...

Your argument assumes that the child is the woman’s body. It is not. Murdering a child is sick. There is no counter argument you will make to make me believe it is right either. Disgusting.
 
dixonk said:
Your argument assumes that the child is the woman’s body. It is not. Murdering a child is sick. There is no counter argument you will make to make me believe it is right either. Disgusting.
Click to expand...

The child is not a child for quite some time into a pregnancy. Late term abortions should be outlawed. But the early in the first trimester of a pregnancy? The embryo doesn’t even have a heart or brain yet. The head isn’t developed until like 5 weeks after conception. If any other animal has no head, no heartbeat, and no brain, they are legally and scientifically dead. I’m not sure the fascination with treating a fetus different than anything else.

An embryo/fetus is a parasite. It takes weeks to develop a heart and brain and organs. A fetus can not survive outside of the womb until like 24 weeks. The woman has to grow the fetus, deal with the medical, physical, and emotional consequences of growing a fetus and delivering a baby.

I could never ask my wife to have an abortion. But it’s not my place to mandate a woman what do with a pregnancy.
 
Woody said:
The child is not a child for quite some time into a pregnancy. Late term abortions should be outlawed. But the early in the first trimester of a pregnancy? The embryo doesn’t even have a heart or brain yet. The head isn’t developed until like 5 weeks after conception. If any other animal has no head, no heartbeat, and no brain, they are legally and scientifically dead. I’m not sure the fascination with treating a fetus different than anything else.

An embryo/fetus is a parasite. It takes weeks to develop a heart and brain and organs. A fetus can not survive outside of the womb until like 24 weeks. The woman has to grow the fetus, deal with the medical, physical, and emotional consequences of growing a fetus and delivering a baby.

I could never ask my wife to have an abortion. But it’s not my place to mandate a woman what do with a pregnancy.
Click to expand...

Think of this. What if your mother decided to have an abortion? What about some of the most influential people in the world...what if their mom decided to have an abortion? It’s used as a method of birth control. Do you see planned parenthoods in nice neighborhoods?
 
sammpedd88 said:
Think of this. What if your mother decided to have an abortion? What about some of the most influential people in the world...what if their mom decided to have an abortion? It’s used as a method of birth control. Do you see planned parenthoods in nice neighborhoods?
Click to expand...

What if the mothers of all those democrats and BLM people you hate had an abortion?
 
dixonk said:
Your argument assumes that the child is the woman’s body. It is not. Murdering a child is sick. There is no counter argument you will make to make me believe it is right either. Disgusting.
Click to expand...

If you care about children so much, doesnt make sense to support Republicrats and Dump. As of now the worst child humanitarian crisis in the world is in Yemen, and Dump sells the Saudi's tech, aids in intelligence and supports their wars.

Whats really the difference between taking them out of the womb, or killing them when they are out?

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
If you care about children so much, doesnt make sense to support Republicrats and Dump. As of now the worst child humanitarian crisis in the world is in Yemen, and Dump sells the Saudi's tech, aids in intelligence and supports their wars.

Whats really the difference between taking them out of the womb, or killing them when they are out?
Click to expand...

One controls women.
 
sammpedd88 said:
But your response is exactly what I thought it would be. No way responsible way to have a discussion with your response.
Click to expand...

But I literally responded to you with your response to me??? So you’re saying there was no way to have a discussion with your response either?
 
ax1 said:
If you care about children so much, doesnt make sense to support Republicrats and Dump. As of now the worst child humanitarian crisis in the world is in Yemen, and Dump sells the Saudi's tech, aids in intelligence and supports their wars.

Whats really the difference between taking them out of the womb, or killing them when they are out?

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

You are assuming that I support republicans or that I proudly belong to the Republican Party. I have said it too many times to count. I vote republican because I don’t want democrats in control. They are the lesser of two evils. And no, the libertarian party isn’t going to magically come in and give us all our freedom back. They can barley manage to get on ballots let alone bringing our politicians in line.

What the Saudi’s do in Yemen is not something I am going to concern myself with. Savages will be savages. I am concerned with what’s going on at home.
 
dixonk said:
You are assuming that I support republicans or that I proudly belong to the Republican Party. I have said it too many times to count. I vote republican because I don’t want democrats in control. They are the lesser of two evils. And no, the libertarian party isn’t going to magically come in and give us all our freedom back. They can barley manage to get on ballots let alone bringing our politicians in line.

What the Saudi’s do in Yemen is not something I am going to concern myself with. Savages will be savages. I am concerned with what’s going on at home.
Click to expand...

But knowingly supporting Republicrats that has propped up global mass murder and supported other terrorist regimes to do so and has aborted babies by dropping Dump love bombs on pregnant women, you are therefore and accomplice to mass murder, are you not?
 
ax1 said:
But knowling supporting a group that has propped up global mass murder and has aborted babies by dropping Dump love bombs on pregnant women, you are therefore and accomplice to mass murder, are you not?
Click to expand...

The republicans have dropped bombs and murdered 61million babies? Just a second ago you said it was Saudi bombing babies in Yemen.
 
dixonk said:
The republicans have dropped bombs and murdered 61million babies? Just a second ago you said it was Saudi bombing babies in Yemen.
Click to expand...

Yes, and who is aiding the Saudi's? Im not even getting into the direct wars Republicrats are responsible for, and there is alot.

61 million babies in what period of time?

All Im saying is it de-legitimizes the righteous abortion argument, and a little less mass murder doesnt make you or anyone else better. You still all are mass murderers.

Just think about it, I know your a good dude dont take it literally, but this is what Ive been doing for years, calling out the hypocrisy of the Republicrat party.
 
ax1 said:
Yes, and who is aiding the Saudi's? Im not even getting into the direct wars Republicrats are responsible for, and there is alot.

61 million babies in what period of time?

All Im saying is it de-legitimizes the righteous abortion argument, and a little less mass murder doesnt make you or anyone else better. You still all are mass murderers.

Just think about it, I know your a good dude dont take it literally, but this is what Ive been doing for years, calling out the hypocrisy of the Republicrat party.
Click to expand...

We can call them out all we want. It still will come down to choosing the lesser of two evils. One party trying to destroy America and the other party trying to destroy Yemen. I will choose the one destroying Yemen.
 
dixonk said:
We can call them out all we want. It still will come down to choosing the lesser of two evils. One party trying to destroy America and the other party trying to destroy Yemen. I will choose the one destroying Yemen.
Click to expand...

That’s a lie, there are more that 2 parties on the ballot sir.

And destroying Yemen isn’t good for America either, then you wonder why terrorists blow themselves up over here, on top of it all we are all broke, Dump cares about feeding our stolen tax dollars to the Military Industrial Complex rather than making life better for the average joe and hockey mom. Another note, whatever happened to my file taxes on a single postcard promise?

Didn’t 9/11 destroy America? You buy into this they blew us up because they hate our freedom bullkrap?? RRRROOOOOFFFFLLLLLLLLLLLLL
 
ax1 said:
That’s a lie, there are more that 2 parties on the ballot sir.

And destroying Yemen isn’t good for America either, then you wonder why terrorists blow themselves up over here, on top of it all we are all broke, Dump cares about feeding our stolen tax dollars to the Military Industrial Complex rather than making life better for the average joe and hockey mom. Another note, whatever happened to my file taxes on a single postcard promise?

Didn’t 9/11 destroy America? You buy into this they blew us up because they hate our freedom bullkrap?? RRRROOOOOFFFFLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Click to expand...

You are right. There are more than 2 parties. Now if you can tell that to the other 120 million voters we might get somewhere. Until then I can’t risk sacrificing my vote. Love them or hate them the republicans are better for my families welfare than the democrats and when I break things down to its simplest form, my family is the most important aspect of my decision making process. I’m a businessman and it all comes down to ROI. My ROI for a Republican vote is higher than a wasted L vote. And a D vote is throwing money down the toilet.
 
dixonk said:
You are right. There are more than 2 parties. Now if you can tell that to the other 120 million voters we might get somewhere. Until then I can’t risk sacrificing my vote. Love them or hate them the republicans are better for my families welfare than the democrats and when I break things down to its simplest form, my family is the most important aspect of my decision making process. I’m a businessman and it all comes down to ROI. My ROI for a Republican vote is higher than a wasted L vote. And a D vote is throwing money down the toilet.
Click to expand...

Until we can overcome the debate rules I assure you it’s not possible, so I don’t really blame you.

There is a movement to reform the 15% rule for debates.

I’m my books, every candidate who is actually on the ballot should be on stage getting their points across.

Still amazing how Dump used to condemn these rigged debates, now he wants no part of JoJo!
 
ax1 said:
Until we can overcome the debate rules I assure you it’s not possible, so I don’t really blame you.

There is a movement to reform the 15% rule for debates.

I’m my books, every candidate who is actually on the ballot should be on stage getting their points across.

Still amazing how Dump used to condemn these rigged debates, no he wants to part of JoJo!
Click to expand...

15% is a pretty low threshold. What do you propose? It’s actually a little unfamiliar to me to base my decision on a debate performance. I guess that’s how a big percentage of people vote? You also have to realize that people like us that do not want government involvement in anything other than protection of rights and security are nowhere close to main stream. Most people on both sides of the aisle want a social safety net.

Would a libertarian candidate ever pull more than 15% of the vote, I am not sure. It would be interesting to find out. I would be down with the party as I identify more closely to libertarian than I do conservative. But it would only come when I can be sure that it’s not a throw away vote.
 
ax1 said:
Until we can overcome the debate rules I assure you it’s not possible, so I don’t really blame you.

There is a movement to reform the 15% rule for debates.

I’m my books, every candidate who is actually on the ballot should be on stage getting their points across.

Still amazing how Dump used to condemn these rigged debates, no he wants to part of JoJo!
Click to expand...

15% is a pretty low threshold. What do you propose? It’s actually a little unfamiliar to me to base my decision on a debate performance. I guess that’s how a big percentage of people vote? You also have to realize that people like us that do not want government involvement in anything other than protection of rights and security are nowhere close to main stream. Most people on both sides of the aisle want a social safety net.

Would a libertarian candidate ever pull more than 15% of the vote, I am not sure. It would be interesting to find out. I would be down with the party as I identify more closely to libertarian than I do conservative. But it would only come when I can be sure that it’s not a throw away vote.
 
NYC sees 3 times more shootings over weekend than same time last year---chicago records more than double
 
democrats fail to address how they would fix violence rocking US cities at the dnc
 
HIT4ME said:
Serious question - what are you basing this statement on? Do you have any solid evidence he is a racist? Or is it just a feeling. Would live to see evidence.

We know for sure Biden is more racist than Trump, as he actively fought desegregation, sees poor kids as being non-white, thinks you are not black if you don't vote a certain way and then accuses the black community of having less diversity of thought than the Latino community. If he is less racist than Trump, I would be shocked. Show me some evidence.



I don't know how anyone could vote for a party that is going to be more successful if things are going poorly. Get everyone on welfare, relying on the government, take control of their health...what are you going to do, vote your income, health and ability to survive away?
Click to expand...
I think he misspeaks a fair amount and says some borderline bigoted things. But even I'll admit that people cry racist at things that aren't actually racist.

He tweeted an image of Hillary that had a money background and a Jewish star shaped stamped saying "most corrupt candidate" and people were quick to cry racist. I looked it up, and yes the shape resembles it, but its completely filled in. That's just a shape; that's not racist.

People forget that using the term racist this loosely devalues the word. Imagery can have racial overtones, but to me they were really stretching on this one.
 
as murders soar in chicago, judges are freeing more violent crime suspects on electronic monitoring
 
HIT4ME said:
Serious question - what are you basing this statement on? Do you have any solid evidence he is a racist? Or is it just a feeling. Would live to see evidence.

We know for sure Biden is more racist than Trump, as he actively fought desegregation, sees poor kids as being non-white, thinks you are not black if you don't vote a certain way and then accuses the black community of having less diversity of thought than the Latino community. If he is less racist than Trump, I would be shocked. Show me some evidence.



I don't know how anyone could vote for a party that is going to be more successful if things are going poorly. Get everyone on welfare, relying on the government, take control of their health...what are you going to do, vote your income, health and ability to survive away?
Click to expand...
I find it bizarre how adamant people are universal healthcare doesnt work. You guys are literally controlled by your insurance companies, yet prefer that over the gubment?
 
NYU student group demands black only student housing on campus
 
thebigt said:
democrats fail to address how they would fix violence rocking US cities at the dnc
Click to expand...
They didn't address crap aside from their hate for Trump

T.D.S
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top