Unanswered M1A vs MSten to kickstart a Test E cycle

bignastyisbac

Member
Awards
1
  • First Up Vote
Hey guys, I'm looking to do a 4 week oral to kick start my test cycle. What are your thoughts of Msten vs M1A? Anyone have experiences with either?
 

hyperCat

Active member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
Yes, I've run both. For me, M1A kicks in quicker, but it's mostly glycogen buildup. Msten takes a little longer, but tends to yield higher quality gains. This is just my experience. I like them both. M1A tends to aggravate a small amount of gyno I have developed over time, but it's very minor and a little bit of letro/ralox usually knocks it right out. If this is just a kickstart and you're running it 4 weeks, I'd lean toward Msten, but either should get the job done.
 

bignastyisbac

Member
Awards
1
  • First Up Vote
Yes, I've run both. For me, M1A kicks in quicker, but it's mostly glycogen buildup. Msten takes a little longer, but tends to yield higher quality gains. This is just my experience. I like them both. M1A tends to aggravate a small amount of gyno I have developed over time, but it's very minor and a little bit of letro/ralox usually knocks it right out. If this is just a kickstart and you're running it 4 weeks, I'd lean toward Msten, but either should get the job done.
Thanks brother, I appreciate your input. I'm leaning towards Msten too
 

Similar threads


Top