Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

New York Times article on SARMS

I wouldn't believe anything the New York Times puts out. Some of what they stated is true, but the general tone of the article is obviously biased, as is everything they put out.

If the government is so worried about people ****ing themselves up, why not make a safe steroid like anavar legal? If they really have the safety of the public in mind.

Alcohol is 100x more dangerous than anavar, but it is legal. I don't get it.
 
RickyBlobby said:
I wouldn't believe anything the New York Times puts out. Some of what they stated is true, but the general tone of the article is obviously biased, as is everything they put out.

If the government is so worried about people ****ing themselves up, why not make a safe steroid like anavar legal? If they really have the safety of the public in mind.

Alcohol is 100x more dangerous than anavar, but it is legal. I don't get it.
Click to expand...

I would call it lazy journalism, not fake, but generalizations without details such as compound names, were just annoying to read about. They obviously searched the web and copy pasted without speaking to any subject matter experts. They get paid by the word.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top