Don't be afraid of Prohormones if you are over 21 and a "Noob"

noobs/beginners who likely aren't even aware of these issues, let alone how to go about trying to minimize them.

Ex-fukin-actly.

Same sh1t is said about SARMs (they safe as fuk guize!)

But at least with SARMs we have some decent data, both already and emerging. Theres zilcherooni PK etc data specifically on 4-andro and epiandro...and Id hazard a guess that most users are stacking at least one of those with 1-andro.
 
Ex-fukin-actly.

Same sh1t is said about SARMs (they safe as fuk guize!)

But at least with SARMs we have some decent data, both already and emerging. Theres zilcherooni PK etc data specifically on 4-andro and epiandro...and Id hazard a guess that most users are stacking at least one of those with 1-andro.
What I don't understand is how these PHs are being pushed as "safe" when one of the only studies we have on it concluded that the risks outweigh the benefits, and also that the negative impacts on cardiovascular health are at least as significant, if not more, than anabolic steroids. Basically, what these people saying that these PHs are completely safe are saying, likely without even considering or knowing it, is that the negative impacts of AAS on cardiovascular health parameters is not significant or practically relevant, as the PHs seem to possess at least the same degree of negative effects as the AS. So are the negative effects of AS on cardiovascular health/parameters not a significant/practical/relevant concern, or are the effects PHs have actually significant/practical/relevant? I don't see an alternative to one of those two above mentioned conclusions regarding the cardiovascular effects of AS/AAS/PHs.
 
Well I find in these discussions "safe" is a bit of a weasel word. Without clearly defined parameters, its a relative term with woolly moving-target boundaries.

I havent pulled up any exogenous testosterone studies to compare lipid impact to 1-andro because its a futile exercise: people run a wide range of test doses, and stack the stuff with other sh1t. Where do we draw the line? Besides, test obviously has other virtues and costs besides lipid impact.

Right off the top of my head, I can envision a cherry picked argument for 1-andro being "safer" than exo test, and vice versa. It ultimately depends on what parameters you wish to emphasize, and which you wish to downplay/ignore.
 
Well I find in these discussions "safe" is a bit of a weasel word. Without clearly defined parameters, its a relative term with woolly moving-target boundaries.

I havent pulled up any exogenous testosterone studies to compare lipid impact to 1-andro because its a futile exercise: people run a wide range of test doses, and stack the stuff with other sh1t. Where do we draw the line? Besides, test obviously has other virtues and costs besides lipid impact.

Right off the top of my head, I can envision a cherry picked argument for 1-andro being "safer" than exo test, and vice versa. It ultimately depends on what parameters you wish to emphasize, and which you wish to downplay/ignore.
The Texas study that I quoted from and linked to earlier did discuss the cardiovascular impacts of this "new gen" PH compared to older PHs and AS, but, like you said, people run different doses/combinations/lengths/etc. My point is only that OP seems to be significantly (and irresponsibly IMO) downplaying/understating/neglecting the potential negative effects of these PHs, presenting a false image of safety as determined by legality. I agree that arguments can likely be posed in favor of test or 1-andro, but the fact that there is even a discussion/argument to be made here seems to indicate that PHs should be respected, treated with caution, and not simply regarded as "safe" because they're legal.

Edit: It looks like OP actually recommended "Hi-Tech 1-Testosterone - 2 pills per day LG Sciences 1-Andro - 2 pills per day" to someone who's been seriously training for about a year, and also had no mention/recommendation of OCT support, or even any mention of what to look out for (potential adverse effects of PH use), and also recommended an OTC-only PCT. But it's legal, so it must be safe.
 
Honestly....this thread topic makes me want to leave AM all together...

You know full well those studies on 1-dhea showed unfavorable changes in in cholesterol, cardiac health and suppression of natural testosterone. None of which should be taken lightly, especially by people in the age range you known you are targeting. It seems wildly irresponsible to me to compare those kinds of products to herbal otc products, in an effort to get people to "not worry about it".
 
What I don't understand is how these PHs are being pushed
--> $$$ <-- news flash - the entire platform for and mission of a message board that some affectionately (and some might say foolishly) call a community of like minded bros is actual profitable business created to free you from your cash. ;)
 
These threads remind me of AA meetings. The only thing the people in there did for me was make me want to get drunk. 

Lol, if I didnt know any better Id say thats the type of cynical comment Marla wouldve made.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Dollar , dollar bills y'all...
it is really telling that op did not come back to this thread , yet he's in another one giving advice to a new member ( not training or diet related) .
 
Don't be afraid of Prohormones if you are over 21 and a &quot;Noob&quot;

Honestly....this thread topic makes me want to leave AM all together...

You know full well those studies on 1-dhea showed unfavorable changes in in cholesterol, cardiac health and suppression of natural testosterone. None of which should be taken lightly, especially by people in the age range you known you are targeting. It seems wildly irresponsible to me to compare those kinds of products to herbal otc products, in an effort to get people to "not worry about it".
Don't leave, just learn who to ignore and who to "call out" for their nonsense. The majority of people here aren't believing/condoning/accepting/agreeing with this stuff. There are a lot of good people, and good advice, here on AM. Unfortunately some "silly" things (to put it nicely) get said, but are often/usually shot down.
Edit: It looks like part of my response got lost. TL;DR: There are still a lot of good people here on AM, people who do care, and won't risk someone's health and/or wellbeing to make a sale, people who will recommend proper PCT, even if it means not selling their product to them.
 
Don't be afraid of Prohormones if you are over 21 and a &quot;Noob&quot;

Dollar , dollar bills y'all...
it is really telling that op did not come back to this thread , yet he's in another one giving advice to a new member ( not training or diet related) .
Not only that, but he's saying PHs increase your natural testosterone production. That's beyond misleading to the point of being wrong, irresponsible, and dangerous. Converting a PH to testosterone in your body is NOT increasing your natural production, and you WILL notice at least some suppression upon cessation of the PH, just like with AS/AAS. Suggesting otherwise is simply not correct, and calls the subsequent advice and analysis into question.
 
Don't leave, just learn who to ignore and who to "call out" for their nonsense. The majority of people here aren't believing/condoning/accepting/agreeing with this stuff. There are a lot of good people, and good advice, here on AM. Unfortunately some "silly" things (to put it nicely) get said, but are often/usually shot down.

Edit: It looks like part of my response got lost. TL;DR: There are still a lot of good people here on AM, people who do care, and won't risk someone's health and/or wellbeing to make a sale, people who will recommend proper PCT, even if it means not selling their product to them.
Don't leave, just learn who to ignore and who to "call out" for their nonsense. The majority of people here aren't believing/condoning/accepting/agreeing with this stuff. There are a lot of good people, and good advice, here on AM. Unfortunately some "silly" things (to put it nicely) get said, but are often/usually shot down.

Edit: It looks like part of my response got lost. TL;DR: There are still a lot of good people here on AM, people who do care, and won't risk someone's health and/or wellbeing to make a sale, people who will recommend proper PCT, even if it means not selling their product to them.
please be assured it was not directed at any individual but truth be told the boards exist to profit by selling advertisement space to retailers and manufacturers who profit by selling their wares. Both are profit motivated "business" ventures.

Interesting (ironic) that the virtual environment created to bring products to the people need a community of well meaning members to protect them from the same.
 
please be assured it was not directed at any individual but truth be told the boards exist to profit by selling advertisement space to retailers and manufacturers who profit by selling their wares. Both are profit motivated "business" ventures.

Interesting (ironic) that the virtual environment created to bring products to the people need a community of well meaning members to protect them from the same.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I understand the nature of the business. But simply because the platform was created with profit in mind doesn't mean that that profit is the only thing that every single member, or even every rep, is concerned about. Sure, some people seem to be concerned exclusively on maximizing sales/profit, but some other people/reps still have the compassion/morals/ethics/etc to not try to make another sale or two at the potential expense of someone's health and wellbeing. I suppose my point is that seeking a profit and helping people aren't mutually exclusive, or at least they don't have to be.
 
But at least with SARMs we have some decent data, both already and emerging. Theres zilcherooni PK etc data specifically on 4-andro and epiandro...and Id hazard a guess that most users are stacking at least one of those with 1-andro.

Surely with this in mind it would make more sense to recommend SERM's as a long term HRT/TRT/Testosterone Boosting solution rather than PH's. At least with pharma grade SERM's such as Clomid, Nolva and Torem we know that they DO infact raise natural testosterone production with little to no side effects or increased biomarkers.
 
I am going to play devils advocate here and say that we actually do not have as much data on SARM safety and side effects because in general we use doses that are, in some cases, 10x higher than the clinically studied dose... So what do we really know objectively from published studies...not much. what we do know is anecdotal and people posting their bloods, etc.
 
I am going to play devils advocate here and say that we actually do not have as much data on SARM safety and side effects because in general we use doses that are, in some cases, 10x higher than the clinically studied dose... So what do we really know objectively from published studies...not much. what we do know is anecdotal and people posting their bloods, etc.

Clomid is actually used as a first resort HRT course by the medical profession. It is a tried, tested and true compound for raising Testosterone in both healthy (In range) and hypogonadal (low range) men.
 
Clomid is actually used as a first resort HRT course by the medical profession. It is a tried, tested and true compound for raising Testosterone in both healthy (In range) and hypogonadal (low range) men.

Note the A in SARM lol
 
Clomid is actually used as a first resort HRT course by the medical profession. It is a tried, tested and true compound for raising Testosterone in both healthy (In range) and hypogonadal (low range) men.
You keep referring to serms (nolva, Clomid etc) when they are talking about sarms (ostarine, lgd etc). They're 2 different animals
 
Note the A in SARM lol

You keep referring to serms (nolva, Clomid etc) when they are talking about sarms (ostarine, lgd etc). They're 2 different animals

I know SARM's and SERM's are totally different compounds. I was talking SERM's in regards to the safety aspect of this thread and in terms of recommending SERM's over PH's due to their substantially higher track record, safety and proven effectiveness
 
Don't be afraid of Prohormones if you are over 21 and a &quot;Noob&quot;

I know SARM's and SERM's are totally different compounds. I was talking SERM's in regards to the safety aspect of this thread and in terms of recommending SERM's over PH's due to their substantially higher track record, safety and proven effectiveness
But Congress bro... these PHs are legal OTC so they must be completely safe!
 
Honestly....this thread topic makes me want to leave AM all together...

You know full well those studies on 1-dhea showed unfavorable changes in in cholesterol, cardiac health and suppression of natural testosterone. None of which should be taken lightly, especially by people in the age range you known you are targeting. It seems wildly irresponsible to me to compare those kinds of products to herbal otc products, in an effort to get people to "not worry about it".

Read his sig then check his link to see whose products he sells
I thought it was funny
 
Read his sig then check his link to see whose products he sells
I thought it was funny
You mean this:
Nothing I say is medical advice and supplements only enhance and optimize your diet and exercise plan. Prohormones sold by Hi-Tech are not active and not anabolic steroids.
I sure hope it's not medical advice, as a lot of what he is saying is simply incorrect, not that medical advice is inherently correct either, but that's not really the point. He hasn't really checked back into this thread to respond to anything brought up, has he?
 
I am going to play devils advocate here and say that we actually do not have as much data on SARM safety and side effects because in general we use doses that are, in some cases, 10x higher than the clinically studied dose... So what do we really know objectively from published studies...not much. what we do know is anecdotal and people posting their bloods, etc.

As far as I know there have been no Phase l studies done on any of the popular dhea/andro compounds; specifically, ascending dose studies. LGD has been assessed in doses up to 22mg, which is definitely in the realm of what bbers ingest. The largest dose used on humans with ostarine, as far as I know, was 3mg, which is obviously a far cry from what many bbers use.

3mg ostar vs 1mg lgd vs 330mg 1-dhea....crudely, the lipid impacts are all similiar. If anything, the 1-dhea increases LDL more at those comparative doses.

Its entirely likely that those SARM effects will only increase in higher doses, they certainly wouldnt improve. But at least we have data on those compounds, we have nuthin on 4-dhea and epiandro.
 
As far as I know there have been no Phase l studies done on any of the popular dhea/andro compounds; specifically, ascending dose studies. LGD has been assessed in doses up to 22mg, which is definitely in the realm of what bbers ingest. The largest dose used on humans with ostarine, as far as I know, was 3mg, which is obviously a far cry from what many bbers use.

3mg ostar vs 1mg lgd vs 330mg 1-dhea....crudely, the lipid impacts are all similiar. If anything, the 1-dhea increases LDL more at those comparative doses.

Its entirely likely that those SARM effects will only increase in higher doses, they certainly wouldnt improve. But at least we have data on those compounds, we have nuthin on 4-dhea and epiandro.

And how long did they test these higher doses? For a full 6-8 weeks?
 
And how long did they test these higher doses? For a full 6-8 weeks?

You might be misunderstanding my intention here.

I inititally brought up SARMs for 2 reasons. One, the OP claiming andros to be safe etc reminded me of Gimelli and his similiar claims re ostarine and LGD.

Secondly, we do have some PK and safety data on SARMs. Obviously. We have none on many of the andros. Im not claiming this necessarily makes SARMs more safe. I am merely pointing out a relative epistemic vacuum. Its easier to extrapolate from something (SARM data) than nothing (andro data).
 
You might be misunderstanding my intention here.

I inititally brought up SARMs for 2 reasons. One, the OP claiming andros to be safe etc reminded me of Gimelli and his similiar claims re ostarine and LGD.

Secondly, we do have some PK and safety data on SARMs. Obviously. We have none on many of the andros. Im not claiming this makes SARMs more safe. I am merely pointing out a relative epistemic vacuum. Its easier to extropolate from something (SARM data) than nothing (andro data).

I know I’m still being devils advocate though lol
 
I see all this advice to "skip prohormones until you run a bunch of other stuff first. Let me explain why I think that this is flawed logic.

1) Prohormones are natural in the body
2) These so called "natural" herbal testosterone boosters can have negative side effects worse than prohormones such as estrogenic compounds and even boosting testosterone without reducing aromatase.
3) Testosterone boosters have been shown in studies to not impact lean mass
4) Congress gave us DHEA's as an exemption and Progestins as an exemption for a reason, so let's enjoy the benefits!
5) Faster results in your body means faster results in your life. Don't wait to enjoy success. That's like saying "Skip the $22 an hour job and start with the $13 an hour job so you can get used to money".

If you want to start with a prohormone 1-DHEA is an amazing place to start. Nothing crazy, nothing exotic just a good basic prohormone. If you want to take a testosterone boosting agent like RISE AND SWELL (which is amazing by the way) then even better, but there is no reason to shy away from prohormones as your first supplement!
Seriously? Wow. Kinda speechless right now.
 
You might be misunderstanding my intention here.

I inititally brought up SARMs for 2 reasons. One, the OP claiming andros to be safe etc reminded me of Gimelli and his similiar claims re ostarine and LGD.

Secondly, we do have some PK and safety data on SARMs. Obviously. We have none on many of the andros. Im not claiming this necessarily makes SARMs more safe. I am merely pointing out a relative epistemic vacuum. Its easier to extrapolate from something (SARM data) than nothing (andro data).

It was a good example IMO, because some SARMs and 2 Step DHEAs get painted with the same brush by some people. N=1 example of 20mg Ostarine for 8 weeks, and a *cough* natty PCT (which did jack IMO). Lipids looked better at the end believe it or not (but this could be due to on cycle support and being more "healthy" with the diet - as people are usually wont to do while taking something), but it KILLS testosterone production (as *anything* that attaches to the androgen receptor will). Thank you Uncle SARM. Safe is a relative term, and none are safer than food, sleep and training.
 

Attachments

  • UncleSARM Osta.jpg
    UncleSARM Osta.jpg
    185.9 KB · Views: 333
This is in regards to the DHEA based PH's NOT THE Desinger Steroids often marketed as PH's.

Do I think they should be taken willy nilly with caution thrown to the wind? No of course not and neither should any supplement for that matter.

Are they anywhere near as dangerous as some people claim? IMO NO!

Morons will always find a way to be self destructive, that is nature thinning the heard. Anyone with half a brain willing to put in minimal effort in the research department can run a pretty safe PH cycle. It's just not that complicated folks.

All that being said I would prefer people try other stuff for a while for no reason other than it would put more training time under their belt.
 
Why not get a few years of training under your belt and get the easy beginner gains and result to hormones once you get closer to your genetic potential and gains stall. Newbs shouldn't mess with hormones regardless especially when they may give up the hobby in a year especially when anyone initially starting out practically gets steroid like gains the first few years of consistent living anyways
 
Don't be afraid of Prohormones if you are over 21 and a &quot;Noob&quot;

This is in regards to the DHEA based PH's NOT THE Desinger Steroids often marketed as PH's.

Do I think they should be taken willy nilly with caution thrown to the wind? No of course not and neither should any supplement for that matter.

Are they anywhere near as dangerous as some people claim? IMO NO!

Morons will always find a way to be self destructive, that is nature thinning the heard. Anyone with half a brain willing to put in minimal effort in the research department can run a pretty safe PH cycle. It's just not that complicated folks.

All that being said I would prefer people try other stuff for a while for no reason other than it would put more training time under their belt.
See my response to you in the other thread. Actually, the Texas study on 1-andro concluded that the adverse effects on cardiovascular health is "much worse" than first-generation PHs, and "appear to be as bad as, if not worse than, those attributes to AS."

Can these PHs be ran safely? Sure, especially when pepper precautions are taken, but downplaying or brushing off these major/significant concerns and potential adverse effects is not doing anyone (besides the people selling them) any favors, and is not factually accurate. Did you even read the conclusion from that study that everyone references when talking about 1-andro?
 
I AM NOT BRUSHING OFF THE SIDES AND RISKS. Merely stating that a drop in HDL for six weeks, in the grand scheme of things. means just about jack sh*t for longterm health. If you don't believe this I will ask the cardiologist tomorrow about this. I will get their opinions on longterm risk of two six week drops in HDL.
 
I AM NOT BRUSHING OFF THE SIDES AND RISKS. Merely stating that a drop in HDL for six weeks, in the grand scheme of things. means just about jack sh*t for longterm health. If you don't believe this I will ask the cardiologist tomorrow about this. I will get their opinions on longterm risk of two six week drops in HDL.
I'm not really saying that YOU are the one downplaying or brushing off the adverse effects, but OP certainly is/was. He's the one saying PHs are safer than natural test boosters, that they increase your natural testosterone production, and that they're safe because they're legal. You didn't really say anything outlandish or unsubstantiated, but I wasn't sure if you were supporting the claims made by OP, which are, in my opinion, completely inaccurate and irresponsible. Also, it wouldn't surprise me at all if some of these people recommend >6 week cycles and/or significantly more than 2 cycles per year. Hell, they're recommending them with no OCT and OTC PCT to beginner lifters.
 
Out of curiosity any lab tests on lipids of users taking Alphamax XT? Genuinely curious because an increase in test and lowering of estrogen should have an effect.
 
I'm not really saying that YOU are the one downplaying or brushing off the adverse effects, but OP certainly is/was. He's the one saying PHs are safer than natural test boosters, that they increase your natural testosterone production, and that they're safe because they're legal. You didn't really say anything outlandish or unsubstantiated, but I wasn't sure if you were supporting the claims made by OP, which are, in my opinion, completely inaccurate and irresponsible. Also, it wouldn't surprise me at all if some of these people recommend >6 week cycles and/or significantly more than 2 cycles per year. Hell, they're recommending them with no OCT and OTC PCT to beginner lifters.

If you want to really get bogged down in semantics your body does create or produce the test from 4dhea, so technically one could argue it was naturally produced via an exo source of raw materials. I know that is a heavily semantic argument lol but technically lol. Either way there is no way to argue that longterm use would lead to suppression and no natural test being made.
 
Out of curiosity any lab tests on lipids of users taking Alphamax XT? Genuinely curious because an increase in test and lowering of estrogen should have an effect.
Honestly, we know that AlphaMax XT isn't going to increase testosterone to supraphysiological levels, and isn't going to crush estrogen to negligible levels either, nice false equivalency though. Saying that something will inherently harm lipids because it increases testosterone levels is simply not correct, and ignores other MoAs of various ingredients. Actually, some ingredients in AlphaMax XT have been shown to improve lipids. Like ashwagandha, which has been shown to INCREASE HDL and DECREASE LDL.
 
If you want to really get bogged down in semantics your body does create or produce the test from 4dhea, so technically one could argue it was naturally produced via an exo source of raw materials. I know that is a heavily semantic argument lol but technically lol. Either way there is no way to argue that longterm use would lead to suppression and no natural test being made.
So that means if I take Adrafinil I'm increasing my body's natural Modafinil production? Even if it's "technically/semantically" correct, it is incredibly misleading haha.
 
Honestly, we know that AlphaMax XT isn't going to increase testosterone to supraphysiological levels, and isn't going to crush estrogen to negligible levels either, nice false equivalency though. Saying that something will inherently harm lipids because it increases testosterone levels is simply not correct, and ignores other MoAs of various ingredients. Actually, some ingredients in AlphaMax XT have been shown to improve lipids. Like ashwagandha, which has been shown to INCREASE HDL and DECREASE LDL.

I said should not absolutely should. I would still like to see the labs personally. In order to be an effective product it would need to influence E/T to some extent. That gives the POTENTIAL to see a change. Hell like you said with ashwagandha it might be an overall positive one. We have seen folks blood work for E levels on Inhibit-E which uses on of the AI's from Alphamax XT and they were statistically significant with their changes. So there is a chance. I am not looking for a big AHA! LOOK YOURS IS BAD TO moments, I am genuinely interested. I wish we had labs for everything people run, it would be cool. I work in medicine and I love labs, good bad or indifferent.
 
I said should not absolutely should. I would still like to see the labs personally. In order to be an effective product it would need to influence E/T to some extent. That gives the POTENTIAL to see a change. Hell like you said with ashwagandha it might be an overall positive one. We have seen folks blood work for E levels on Inhibit-E which uses on of the AI's from Alphamax XT and they were statistically significant with their changes. So there is a chance. I am not looking for a big AHA! LOOK YOURS IS BAD TO moments, I am genuinely interested. I wish we had labs for everything people run, it would be cool. I work in medicine and I love labs, good bad or indifferent.
Actually, playing Devil's advocate here, and not suggesting that this is the case, but it could be an "effective" product without needing to actually effect testosterone or estrogen at all. You can increase endurance, body composition, performance, libido, etc (all benefits "associated with" increased testosterone and what people would look for) via other MoAs. Take forskolin for example, which has been shown to increase testosterone, but its major effects on body composition come from its effects on cAMP, not increasing testosterone. Or maca (which isn't in AlphaMax XT, but is relevant to the discussion), that can increase libido without increasing testosterone. I would, however, argue that a lot of AlphaMax XT's benefits come from other MOAs than simply increasing testosterone per se, although multiple ingredients in it have been shown to increase testosterone to at least some degree.
 
Actually, playing Devil's advocate here, and not suggesting that this is the case, but it could be an "effective" product without needing to actually effect testosterone or estrogen at all. You can increase endurance, body composition, performance, libido, etc (all benefits "associated with" increased testosterone and what people would look for) via other MoAs. Take forskolin for example, which has been shown to increase testosterone, but its major effects on body composition come from its effects on cAMP, not increasing testosterone. Or maca (which isn't in AlphaMax XT, but is relevant to the discussion), that can increase libido without increasing testosterone. I would, however, argue that a lot of AlphaMax XT's benefits come from other MOAs than simply increasing testosterone per se, although multiple ingredients in it have been shown to increase testosterone to at least some degree.

I would still want to see the test as I feel we would see changes in hormone levels and it would be cool to see if we could influence levels to some extent without neg. effects on lipids. It would be cool to see where the point of harm begins.
 
I would still want to see the test as I feel we would see changes in hormone levels and it would be cool to see if we could influence levels to some extent without neg. effects on lipids. It would be cool to see where the point of harm begins.
There may not even be a detectable "point of harm" that we can find, as there are multiple variables and MoAs at play here. Even if increasing testosterone by x% leads to a y% decrease in cholesterol ratio, that effect could be reduced, negated, or even outweighed by the effects of other MoAs of different ingredients. Realistically, we know that this sort of thing can be done, as that's a big reason why people use OCT products, to try to minimize the negative effects that PH/AAS have on lipids (and various other parameters). There also is a difference between promoting your body's natural testosterone production and introducing exogenous testosterone (or compounds that your body converts to testosterone, which is the same end result, despite the semantic differences).
 
See my response to you in the other thread. Actually, the Texas study on 1-andro concluded that the adverse effects on cardiovascular health is "much worse" than first-generation PHs, and "appear to be as bad as, if not worse than, those attributes to AS."

Can these PHs be ran safely? Sure, especially when pepper precautions are taken, but downplaying or brushing off these major/significant concerns and potential adverse effects is not doing anyone (besides the people selling them) any favors, and is not factually accurate. Did you even read the conclusion from that study that everyone references when talking about 1-andro?


Curious to see opus response to this. I think it's pretty hard to dispute any or the above
 
Honestly, we know that AlphaMax XT isn't going to increase testosterone to supraphysiological levels, and isn't going to crush estrogen to negligible levels either, nice false equivalency though. Saying that something will inherently harm lipids because it increases testosterone levels is simply not correct, and ignores other MoAs of various ingredients. Actually, some ingredients in AlphaMax XT have been shown to improve lipids. Like ashwagandha, which has been shown to INCREASE HDL and DECREASE LDL.

My issue is that not a single testosterone booster than I know has any real world results. I agree that PCT and potentially on cycle support is important and should be suggested (it's in our warning to licensee's). Testosterone boosters, even the best of them (Novedex XT and 6-OXO) have failed to produce mass gains even at the very highest levels. My conclusion stands, as long as one is aware of the slight risks and does it properly it has benefits over testosterone boosters.

Testosterone is responsible for the closing of growth plates (conversion to estrogen) and plant extracts often contain estrogenic compounds which have the dangers of making your dick stop growing and your bones to stop growing. The right prohormones taken with the proper support supplements (which the cholesterol and liver may be due to the combination with 6,7 DHB since no other natural prohormones have shown this effect) can actually help males get the gains that they desire.

Estrogen does improve lipid levels "We studied the effect of Withania somnifera (WS) root extract (ethanolic), which contains oestrogen-like withanolides for anti-osteoporotic activity."

There are numerous estrogenic compounds in herbal extracts and that's also something men need a warning for when choosing supplements. DAA can increase aromatase. I don't make products, but I do suggest always a strong and proper warning is on each bottle.
 
My issue is that not a single testosterone booster than I know has any real world results. I agree that PCT and potentially on cycle support is important and should be suggested (it's in our warning to licensee's). Testosterone boosters, even the best of them (Novedex XT and 6-OXO) have failed to produce mass gains even at the very highest levels. My conclusion stands, as long as one is aware of the slight risks and does it properly it has benefits over testosterone boosters.

Testosterone is responsible for the closing of growth plates (conversion to estrogen) and plant extracts often contain estrogenic compounds which have the dangers of making your dick stop growing and your bones to stop growing. The right prohormones taken with the proper support supplements (which the cholesterol and liver may be due to the combination with 6,7 DHB since no other natural prohormones have shown this effect) can actually help males get the gains that they desire.

Estrogen does improve lipid levels "We studied the effect of Withania somnifera (WS) root extract (ethanolic), which contains oestrogen-like withanolides for anti-osteoporotic activity."

There are numerous estrogenic compounds in herbal extracts and that's also something men need a warning for when choosing supplements. DAA can increase aromatase. I don't make products, but I do suggest always a strong and proper warning is on each bottle.
There is so much wrong with this post I don't even know where to start, so I suppose the beginning is as good a place as any. Let's go:

No one is even coming anywhere close to saying that PHs don't have benefits over testosterone boosters. Nice straw man. I completely agree that PHs will yield significantly greater gains in strength and size than testosterone boosters, but also does come with more significant potential adverse effects. Can they be managed? Yes, but that doesn't change the fact that the risks are present, and can be significant, and should be considered and addressed, not shrugged off. As for no testosterone booster producing results, they won't produce results by increasing testosterone per se, but I can show you numerous studies showing that ingredients like ashwagandha, forskolin, etc have been shown to improve body composition, endurance, etc. Granted, it's not close to the same degree as PHs, but it's not "nothing," and they also do, whether you want to admit it or not, have a more favorable safety profile than PHs. Both natural products and PHs have their place. You trying to write off the natural products completely is incorrect.

Are you really recommending prohormones to people whose growth plates are still growing? And even more, recommending them for the purpose of maximizing growth potential for adolescents and young adults? That's asinine. I'm almost at a loss for words. Can we get an Admin in here to see if these recommendations and suggestions are really something we should be allowing and condoning?

As for you mentioning estrogen in regards to ashwagandha, you just love playing with semantics and wording to completely pervert actual meanings and conclusions, don't you? Ashwagandha has been shown in numerous studies to improve testosterone, body composition, endurance, sexual function, etc. What is the practical application of you mentioning estrogen in regards to ashwagandha except fear mongering? There is none.

Your last paragraph is beyond laughable. It's the pot calling the kettle black, except the pot is vantablack, and the kettle is actually dark grey. You think that we should warn people about the estrogenic compounds in ashwagandha? But you're the one recommending prohormones to new, inexperienced, uneducated lifters, claiming that they're "safe because they're legal." Not that they can be ran safely if the potential adverse effects are monitored and minimized, but that they're "safe" by virtue of being legal. You also claimed that these PHs increase your natural testosterone production, which is, at best, a terrible perversion of the semantics of the matter, and completely contrary to the truth, which is that these PHs will lead to at least some level of suppression, if not shutdown, of natural testosterone production upon cessation of use.

I could probably type pages and pages about all the things you've said that are, at best, misleading, and, at worst, completely incorrect and irresponsible, but I think I've made my point(s) clear already, as evidenced by the many people liking, agreeing with, and repping me for my comments and concerns. At this point, I'm just wasting my time going back and forth with you, and you still haven't even addressed most of the points/issues/concerns I presented, but only responded to your own made up questions and concerns, as that's the only way you are able to make an argument that makes even a little sense.

To liven things up a bit, here are a series of pictures of Arnold that demonstrate the sequence of my initial responses to the majority of your posts. There's just so much that makes me go, "what, did you really just say that," followed by a facepalm upon realizing that you did actually say what I thought you said, and finally laughing, as if I didn't laugh about it, I'd cry at the insanity of it all. It's all one big joke really.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
You have your opinions and that's great. I think that prohormones are reasonably safe for men over 21 (what I suggest to licensee's) and certainly are candidates for on cycle support if one worries about such things (I do not).

We can disagree and I don't think my opinion is laughable nor reckless and I have compared less studied ingredients that could have way worse effects that no one discussed. Boosting testosterone has shown ZERO activity in building additional muscle mass with diet and exercise. They do contain estrogenic compounds or at least create more estrogen with the "boosting" and they often don't have estrogen inhibitors or aromatase inhibitors.

I don't think my suggestion that men understand the risks use prohormones.

We can leave it at that I suppose and I am ok with you and I disagreeing on the topic, but at the same point it's not irresponsible to use an herbal testosterone booster with rat studies that show estrogenic effects in rats? Estrogen can close growth plates and things like 1-DHEA and Epiandrosterone don't convert into estrogen and I would personally be more concerned with a young man using an herbal booster than a prohormone that doesn't convert.
 
Back
Top