Pec.Major
Well-known member
Thanks. I was looking at Tomatidine in another thread, but I haven't seen any supplements with that ingredient.
Titan from Antaues Labs is the only one available at the moment.
Thanks. I was looking at Tomatidine in another thread, but I haven't seen any supplements with that ingredient.
But you're in range, why spend the money anyways. No additional results even if it raised values within range. (As many studies do show btw, unfortunate you've had no luck)
No real results from it anyways though aside from libido.
The results come to those who are lower than their natural set point, lowered by age or something else.
Because another common myth, widely propagated on this board, is a 100 to 200 point bump from bottom of the 'Normal' range can make a significant difference to your well being, mood and energy. Broscience I suspect as since using 'non-natty' alternative ,that have significantly increased my test Ive not noticed any marked improvement to mood, energy etc. A large part of this is placebo I reckon

So you are affirming my point?
![]()
Yes! It's taken me 5 yrs to arrive at this realisation
Another common myth on this forum is that an ingredient commonly referred to as, or included in, a "test booster" won't have any effects on body composition or performance simply because it won't increase normal testosterone levels to supraphysiological levels, which ignores other potential MoAs that these ingredients may work via. For example, both ashwagandha and forskolin have research showing that they can give you a little boost in testosterone, and also that they can improve body composition and/or some aspect of performance, but their primary MOAs are not increasing testosterone, so it's largely irrelevant that they won't increase testosterone to supraphysiological levels; think about ashwagandha's role as an adaptogen and forskolin's effect on cAMP. Does that mean that these ingredients should be considered as something other than "test boosters?" Is that just semantics? I still think they have a place in a "test booster" as they do technically increase testosterone, and will provide benefits associated with increased testosterone, even if those benefits aren't technically coming from increased testosterone, although testosterone will still be a bit elevated. But really, if you already have normal t-levels, what are you taking a booster for? Simply to raise a number on a lab sheet that you know won't actually have practical effects as it's still in the normal range? It's more likely that these people use a "test booster" for benefits they think of when they think of testosterone; strength, body composition, mood, libido, etc. If a product provides you with these, isn't that more important than if your already normal testosterone levels increased by 50 or 200 points?Because another common myth, widely propagated on this board, is a 100 to 200 point bump from bottom of the 'Normal' range can make a significant difference to your well being, mood and energy. Broscience I suspect as since using a 'non-natty' alternative ,that has significantly increased my test Ive not noticed any marked improvement to mood, energy etc. A large part of this is placebo I reckon
or spiked...I know what you're saying, I guess I'm try to say is that people with normal t-levels shouldn't automatically ignore all "test boosters" because they won't increase their levels to supraphysiological levels, as effective test boosters (that may be better called something else, who knows), can still provide the benefits they're looking for, within reason of course. I'd put things like AlphaMax XT, Testify, and M-Test in this category; they're labeled as "test boosters," and they may not increase testosterone levels to supraphysiological levels, but they can still provide people with normal testosterone levels with benefits including improved body composition, mood, libido, etc. I know that you know this, but I'm just trying to clarify things for anyone who may be reading this and thinking that anything labeled a "test booster" isn't for them because they have normal testosterone levels. The key is to just look for ingredients that have studies/research showing benefits in healthy people with normal t-levels, not just people with low-T.^I barely view those as test boosters anymore.
Forskolin is better known as a fat loss agent rather than a T-booster everywhere I see it come up, and Ash is an adaptogen first a foremost to me.
I know your point though and well said. A lot of great ingredients have additional hormonal benefits that can sometimes lead to it being labeled a Test-booster when it may actually be "better" at something else as with your examples.
But we can agree that shopping with the intent to get a product that (claims to) raise your testosterone is not in their best interest.
A testosterone increase still within physiologic range has no impact on aesthetics or strength/performance that we have seen in study.
The few times you see test boosters having positive results the participants are either deficient or advanced in years to a point that drop-off from their normal level could have started. (Middle aged+ I would then consider it)
Going above range won't happen on anything natural. If it does, let us know because that s#]/ is goldor spiked...
This is the honest truth. Have you thought about using a SERM like Clomid. Not natty but it will boost your test without most of the sides that come from traditional TRT protocols. Take my word a far better use of your money than the options mentioned above
Can't talk about it on here. Some good threads on how to use it in the Anabolics boards. Where to get it?...you need to do your own google research .
Arachidonic acid
Tomatidine
Ursolic Acid
Tribulus
Ecdysterone
Creatine
HMB
etc.
Ecklonia Cava
epicatechin
phosphatidic acid
Never heard Tribulis called a natural anabolic.
Its more similar in action to HCG, and boosts your LH / FSH levels, which In turn boost
your testosterone levels. And there is only a handful of brands that have been standardized
to get the correct amount of saponins and phytosteroids, so most Tribulis is bunk.
Know any of the good brands?
Have you looked into Gut Health Ultimate for your stomach issues? It's a very strong prebiotic. I have been using it a few months now and I might never stop.Yeah, although if it causes gi tract issues I'm probably better off not taking it.
Have you looked into Gut Health Ultimate for your stomach issues? It's a very strong prebiotic. I have been using it a few months now and I might never stop.
Yeah reflux is no joke. Good luck with your surgery.I'll look into it. In 2-3 weeks I'm going to have surgery for my acid reflux. I forget the term for it, but they tighten the connection at the base of the esophagus. I also have a hiatal hernia that the surgeon is going to fix. I know my stomach will still be acidic after the surgery, but at least I won't get reflux or rarely get it I hope.
Yeah reflux is no joke. Good luck with your surgery.
Ecklonia Cava
epicatechin
phosphatidic acid
Never heard Tribulis called a natural anabolic.
Its more similar in action to HCG, and boosts your LH / FSH levels, which In turn boost
your testosterone levels. And there is only a handful of brands that have been standardized
to get the correct amount of saponins and phytosteroids, so most Tribulis is bunk.
I am blown away that with the title of this post the answer wasnt "No" in the first response ultimately ending the thread.
How did you achieve 73 responses, lol
This page has some good information on it + lists the studies on each respective attributeWhat exactly does Epicatechin do? I can't find any info on it at all.
This page has some good information on it + lists the studies on each respective attribute
Invalid Link Removed
Depending on the dosage used, I would say yes.Read that it raises LH. Does that mean it should be cycled?
Depending on the dosage used, I would say yes.
I'm not familiar with the dosing protocols on (-)epi, but in terms of leutinizing hormone, I would suggest getting it checked professionally to see if it's been elevated or not. This will help you assess the time off needed, etc.More of a hard cycle off(like a month or two off), or can it be cycled similar to let's say longjack, as in 5 days on 2 off?