Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

What would give better results

Both could be better. Add another week for DMZ at 45 and it would be the clear winner. 50 is a very low dose for Halodrol.
 
Yea my friend a few years ago ran the haladrol cycle as his first cycle and he went from 5'9 145lbs 14ish%bf to 165lbs 12ish%bf it was the craziest **** i ever seen and he kept pretty much all of it.

*edit
So I was wondering if those are like extraordinary gains or if something like that would be possible on any halodrol cycle or a shorter cycle of something stronger like dmz?

mike33511 said:
Both could be better. Add another week for DMZ at 45 and it would be the clear winner. 50 is a very low dose for Halodrol.
Click to expand...
 
tysons93 said:
I've seen people get decent results for cycles shorter than 6 weeks.
Click to expand...

Decent and most likely not very sustainable gains. And even at four weeks of superdrol I wouldn't run it without a 6-8 week test base. if you can't invest the time or money into a longer cycle there's no reason you should be cycling at all, in my opinion.
 
I disagree because the way discovered prohormones was from my friend I posted about who ran the halodrol and I don't think he lost any size at maybe like 5lbs or something. But maybe he had good genes
rascal14 said:
Decent and most likely not very sustainable gains. And even at four weeks of superdrol I wouldn't run it without a 6-8 week test base. if you can't invest the time or money into a longer cycle there's no reason you should be cycling at all, in my opinion.
Click to expand...
 
tysons93 said:
Yea my friend a few years ago ran the haladrol cycle as his first cycle and he went from 5'9 145lbs 14ish%bf to 165lbs 12ish%bf it was the craziest **** i ever seen and he kept pretty much all of it.

*edit
So I was wondering if those are like extraordinary gains or if something like that would be possible on any halodrol cycle or a shorter cycle of something stronger like dmz?
Click to expand...


5.9 145lbs . That is why he kept gains bro. If he was 5.9 190lbs it would have been a different story :) Maybe he has some good genes who knows, But I'm calling him being light and FAR from his genetic peak :) I would say DMZ (but that is from reading not use) Good luck bro.
 
tysons93 said:
My goal is to get to 165lbs+ at sub 15% bf right now I'm 164lbs and ide guess between 17-18%.
Click to expand...

That could take probably 8 weeks naturally if you know what you're doing. Lol

You clearly know nothing, so do yourself a favor and get your diet and training together before messing with steroids.
 
Run a calorie deficit of 10% less than maintenance calories. Ruff estimate is multiply body weight x 13. Run Olympus Labs Triumph or PES Ergonine and you cant obtain goal naturally no designer steroids. Much cheaper also.
 
It's all good I already have my cycle set up just waiting to get some work done at the dentist.
dvw said:
Run a calorie deficit of 10% less than maintenance calories. Ruff estimate is multiply body weight x 13. Run Olympus Labs Triumph or PES Ergonine and you cant obtain goal naturally no designer steroids. Much cheaper also.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top