Donald Trump running for president

youngandfree said:
You mean they didn't have any when looking at the old ones?
Click to expand...

They were comparing the new ones to the ones they had to find out if there were duplicates. Surprise, there were.

So, you prefer extending a fruitless investigation and using more taxpayer dollars for nothing? How fiscally conservative of you.
 
Regardless of these new emails. She ignored a federal order to turn over emails and then distroyed them and her husband bought off the AG.

The FBI was wrong then, is wrong now and she and the system that won't prosecute her are corrupt.

This is all independent of and irrelevant to any other candidate but her.
 
David Dunn said:
Regardless of these new emails. She ignored a federal order to turn over emails and then distroyed them and her husband bought off the AG.

The FBI was wrong then, is wrong now and she and the system that won't prosecute her are corrupt.

This is all independent of and irrelevant to any other candidate but her.
Click to expand...

Invalid Link Removed
 
Misfit28 said:
They were comparing the new ones to the ones they had to find out if there were duplicates. Surprise, there were.

So, you prefer extending a fruitless investigation and using more taxpayer dollars for nothing? How fiscally conservative of you.
Click to expand...

So then when do they charge Huma and Carlos for mis handling the classified information, since neither had clearance and the emails were on their laptop? That's a separate crime.

Dont forget that comey has a conflict of interest based on his former position and his income he received and the connection that job had to the Clinton crime foundation. SAME with Loretto Lynch being compromised as the AG, and having a meeting with Slick Willie to tell her to back off. Just because they said they weren't going to do anything about hem doesn't mean there werent criminal acts committed.
 
Misfit28 said:
The FBI has reviewed her emails TWICE and found nothing to charge her OR prosecute her over. WTF.
Click to expand...
Not true. There was considerable reckless disregard for the handling of classified information but they could not prove intent. The issues many Americans have is that if it were anyone else, even a recent high ranking general, they would have been charged and prosecuted.

We've been over this. My inlaw is a very high ranking civilian in the Army securities and clearance who knows first hand what she's done and the risk to life she has put on our soldiers - my son-in-law.

Save us both the time and breath or tell it to someone who'll listen to the bull****!.

I'm moving on. Thanks
 
youngandfree said:
So then when do they charge Huma and Carlos for mis handling the classified information, since neither had clearance and the emails were on their laptop? That's a separate crime.

Dont forget that comey has a Co flick of interest based on his former position and his income he received and the connection that job had to the Clinton crime foundation. SAME with Loretto Lynch being compromised as the AG, and having a meeting with Slick Willie to tell her to back off. Just because they said they weren't going to do anything about hem doesn't mean there werent criminal acts committed.
Click to expand...

He's GOP. Anyway, they also stated that they couldn't prove intent.
 
Misfit28 said:
They were comparing the new ones to the ones they had to find out if there were duplicates. Surprise, there were.

So, you prefer extending a fruitless investigation and using more taxpayer dollars for nothing? How fiscally conservative of you.
Click to expand...

They can save all the tax dollars simply by throwing her ass to the ground and cuffing her for obstruction of justice. No need to do no more, thats 7 years in the slammer and I doubt her corpse will live that long.
 
David Dunn said:
Not true. There was considerable reckless disregard for the handling of classified information but they could not prove intent. The issues many Americans have is that if it were anyone else, even a recent high ranking general, they would have been charged and prosecuted.

We've been over this. My inlaw is a very high ranking civilian in the Army securities and clearance who knows first hand what she's done and the risk to life she has put on our soldiers - my son-in-law.

Save us both the time and breath or tell it to someone who'll listen to the bull****!.

I'm moving on. Thanks
Click to expand...

So she shared info with you?
 
ax1 said:
Do they have the software to restore the 30,000+ emails she illegally destroyed and the FBI should have thrown her in prison for already?
Click to expand...

If they did, I'm sure they would have recovered the ALLEGEDLY deleted emails in question, as they have a hard on for Clinton.
 
Misfit28 said:
If they did, I'm sure they would have recovered the ALLEGEDLY deleted emails in question, as they have a hard on for Clinton.
Click to expand...

Yeah right, you cant recover anything. Regardless if they recovered it or not her illegal intent was there, it was done the day after the subpoena and that hoe needs to be locked up. This is 100% obstruction of justice I cant believe your even debating this.
 
Socalmk6gti said:
There is a thing called morals and integrity and character. I'm sorry, but I am NOT a lawyer if I was and someone confessed to me something of this extremity I would feel the need to report it. There comes a point in time where we accept responsibility for our actions; and the actions around us that we choose to support or deny. If as a lawyer you had a client confessing to the murder/rape of a young woman; I would feel inclined to decline the case on moral and ethical reasoning. If you don't stand for your own beliefs, you aren't going to stand for much. Stand for something you believe in, be proud, and be willing to die for it.

Just my 2 $0.02
Click to expand...

Yes, and Trump is a paragon of virtue, right?
 
Misfit28 said:
If they did, I'm sure they would have recovered the ALLEGEDLY deleted emails in question, as they have a hard on for Clinton.
Click to expand...

ALLEGEDLY?? ?

"They had nothing to do with work," Clinton added. "I didn't see any reason to keep them ... no one wants their personal emails made public, and I think most people understand that and respect that privacy."
 
Misfit28 said:
Because they don't have enough to indict her. **** some people are just plain dense.
Click to expand...

No, you are completely wrong. Lets see you pull off what she did and how fast you get indicted. If you delete 1 email after being issued a subpeana you will be indicted. **** some people are just plain dense.
 
ax1 said:
No, you are completely wrong. Lets see you pull off what she did and how fast you get indicted. If you delete 1 email after being issued a subpeana you will be indicted. **** some people are just plain dense.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not.
 
safest places in case of wwIII

10. Switzerland
9. Tobalu
8. New Zealand
7. Bhutan.
6. Chile
5. Iceland
4. Greenland
3. Malta
2. Ireland
1. Fiji
 
Gutterpump said:
If no evidence has been shown and nothing has been proven, this is purely conjecture and conservative propaganda. Sounds like you're their puppet ;)
Click to expand...

Invalid Link Removed

Some Hillary supporting admin page asked for proof she did a crime from her emails on Facebook then blocked me from commenting after posting this, once blocked they post "See no one can provide evidence!" Lol.
 
Gutterpump said:
If no evidence has been shown and nothing has been proven, this is purely conjecture and conservative propaganda. Sounds like you're their puppet ;)
Click to expand...

We have evidence she destroyed and cleaned the hard drives. Obstruction of justice = 7 years prison blowing Bubbles
/story
 
ax1 said:
We have evidence she destroyed and cleaned the hard drives. Obstruction of justice = 7 years prison blowing Bubbles
/story
Click to expand...

The DOJ which was heavily infiltrated by the Clinton's during the '90's even gave immunity to the aid that helped her destroy the hard drives.
Invalid Link Removed
 
Gutterpump said:
If no evidence has been shown and nothing has been proven, this is purely conjecture and conservative propaganda. Sounds like you're their puppet ;)
Click to expand...
There's evidence and it's been shown. They claimed they couldn't find intent so no charges.

I may not hsve meant to kill you when I shot you but it makes me no less guilty of manslaughter.

Her husband fixed the problem for her. He did it right here on the Tarmac in AZ when he met privately on unoccupied aircraft with the AG just days before to talk about their grandkids.
 
You people in here honestly think Trump is less crooked? Not only is there loads of proof that he's a crooked businessman, and always been crooked, but there's all his personal character faults too that y'all would have to deal with. Not to mention ongoing criminal cases.
 
Gutterpump said:
You people in here honestly think Trump is less crooked? Not only is there loads of proof that he's a crooked businessman, and always been crooked, but there's all his personal character faults too that y'all would have to deal with.
Click to expand...

Absolutely, she is a genocidal military industrial complex terrorist which we have LOADS of proof. Even if Dump was more crooked its not an excuse for any of Hitleries actions.

What matters MOST is that Hitlery have violated during her public office on countless occasions, and we have proof right in her policies and actions.
 
Gutterpump said:
You people in here honestly think Trump is less crooked? Not only is there loads of proof that he's a crooked businessman, and always been crooked, but there's all his personal character faults too that y'all would have to deal with.
Click to expand...
Not the point. Yet you keep comparing. Because he is all you say doesn't mean she's not guilty but when faced with the abundance of proof you keep comparing them. Still not the point.
 
Dump is the larger crook, hands down. The guy is constantly in court, settling out of court or being sued. How can you just ignore his sheer # of court cases for his shadiness?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top