My thoughts on SUP3R PCT

ironwiz

Member
I recently finished running SUP3R PCT and i am very impressed with this products and the results i experienced.

I ran it for 4 weeks with Clomid for 3 weeks after running LGD for 12 weeks at 12mg.

My strength and size continued to rise slowly and i felt very alpha. I experienced increased libido and morning wood.

The product does have an amazing ingredient profile.

I'm wondering why people don't run this solo for 8 weeks as an natty test boosting cycle?
 
Good point. I have 2 bottles waiting for my pct. it would be a waste on cycle but I don't know if it would be any good as a bridge?
 
SUP3R PCT is aimed to be a standalone otc PCT, or supplement to a SERM PCT. It is not a dedicated 'test booster' product, but rather a multi-faceted post cycle health optimiser :D

Olympus now has a dedicated, comprehensive test booster...TEST1FY.

To crudely analogise, SUP3R PCT is like a high end multivitamin, whereas TEST1FY is by comparison much less broad and more focused, like a vitamin k or b complex.
 
As far as a natty test boosting cycle goes, I would not use it because of the DAA. However, DAA is great for PCT. That distinction is the reason why sup3r pct is only for pct IMO
 
As far as a natty test boosting cycle goes, I would not use it because of the DAA. However, DAA is great for PCT. That distinction is the reason why sup3r pct is only for pct IMO

can you elaborate? why would this be great for PCT but not for test boosting?
 
There is a study that DAA reduces test levels in healthy men but another study shows increases in men with low T.

Assuming this is what the previous poster meant, then his implication that DAA is a no go for test boosting is overgeneralised as by the same token it would be a good test booster for men with Low T! I'm not convinced that the finding DAA raises test in hypergonadal men directly translates across to otherwise healthy men on a cycle who may be temporarily suppressed. Ive not seen any research to back this up or that has shown these men, the majority of whom would run a SERM anyway, would recover faster and more completely with DAA than without. It's an anecdote or placebo in my opinion! But that's a separate argument. I have noticed that DAA has become less and less mentioned on the PCT thread over time
 
I've ran DAA in PCT and as a standalone and liked it both times. No bloodwork either way
 
Ive never done cycle before. It's just an observation that DAA as a standalone test booster is being used less and less while I still see it mentioned in people's pct stacks. I have also heard of people having prolactin issues with it while using it as a standalone. With that said, I would personally never use it in a test boosting stack but would definitely consider it if I cycled and wanted an OTC pct.
 
The prolactin issue would come into play regardless of whether you were on cycle or not. Given your assertions are based on your anecdotal observations of usage I suppose it all comes down to one's opinions
 
The prolactin issue would come into play regardless of whether you were on cycle or not. Given your assertions are based on your anecdotal observations of usage I suppose it all comes down to one's opinions

Oh yeah without a doubt. But us natty builders tend to take less risks with supplements. If I see multiple people having prolactin issues with a supplement then count me out. People who cycle tend to take more risks. And even the prolactin issues I am just going off of forum posts on various websites.
 
Back
Top