Old vs new (epi,halo,tren vs this new 1,4 andro crap)

Steele17

New member
So I got my own stock pile of epi halo dmz and tren... Probably enough for two more cycles. All this hype on the 1,4,and epiandros has me curious but not convinced on how well they work. PH are already slightly weak compared to AAS so how would a precursor to a prohormone, stack up against halo,epi etc.... Also my supplier in town runs a store and has no problem selling dmz products via debit cards.. But my last stop through he had something by muscle sport science called mayhem it was a halo, max lmg, and dmz stack. The dosage was 15,20,10mg per pill and the directions say to dose twice a day... Now the guy at the store swears by this stuff he had only a handful left and was actually keeping some for himself, he also made me pay cash. Any one ever hear of it?
 
I think you already know the answer to your own question regarding the ph/andro comparison. It's not a mystery.
 
Yes, my opinion is same like yours. I run few cycle 1 andro with 4 andro and epiandrosterone, had some gains but it depense of dosage. Liver values went up like on methyls even with ordinary cycle supports and tudca.
 
gigante35 said:
Yes, my opinion is same like yours. I run few cycle 1 andro with 4 andro and epiandrosterone, had some gains but it depense of dosage. Liver values went up like on methyls even with ordinary cycle supports and tudca.
Click to expand...
Like on methyls now ??
 
gigante35 said:
Yes, my opinion is same like yours. I run few cycle 1 andro with 4 andro and epiandrosterone, had some gains but it depense of dosage. Liver values went up like on methyls even with ordinary cycle supports and tudca.
Click to expand...

I thought these andro compounds were supposed TO be non toxic unlike the methlyated products
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top