PES Erase original vs Pro

David Phelmer

New member
Hey,

PES Pro has Androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione and Original has DHAA (Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid) from pine bark as aromatase inhibitors . What is the difference between these ?

Much thanks
 
David Phelmer said:
Hey, PES Pro has Androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione and Original has DHAA (Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid) from pine bark as aromatase inhibitors . What is the difference between these ? Much thanks
Click to expand...
I have used both. it's debated but the newer version is a better AI imo. I like arimistane but more for Cort control. Can't go wrong with either though. If I had to choose I would go with the new formula personally.
 
David Phelmer said:
Hey, PES Pro has Androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione and Original has DHAA (Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid) from pine bark as aromatase inhibitors . What is the difference between these ? Much thanks
Click to expand...

The Erase Pro formula ingredient you listed is the old Erase Pro.

The ingredient you listed for Erase, is the new Erase.

The DHAA is superior to Armistane in terms of AIs. DHAA takes longer to notice full effects while Armistane kicks in almost instantly. There are multiple threads about the differences between the two and a solid write up in the PES subsection on DHAA.
 
The new erase pro formula is an upgrade to the previous one. With the old product, users probably noticed more immediate leanness and a drying out affect due to a diuretic effect of one of the compounds, but the new erase pro doesn't contain this ingredient. Our new version is going to assist with the lowering estrogen levels while also promoting fat loss via PPAR agonism. There are also GDA effects with the new version as well.
 
aaronuconn said:
The new erase pro formula is an upgrade to the previous one. With the old product, users probably noticed more immediate leanness and a drying out affect due to a diuretic effect of one of the compounds, but the new erase pro doesn't contain this ingredient. Our new version is going to assist with the lowering estrogen levels while also promoting fat loss via PPAR agonism. There are also GDA effects with the new version as well.
Click to expand...
so would this be a sick stack with TTA-500 then? Or would it be too much of a good thing?
 
Pleasure.

Let us know if you need anything else. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top