Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

New from Platinum Nutraceuticals

Rocket3015

Rocket3015

Legend
I just got a heads up and Platinum Nutraceuticals has a new supplement in the works that is cutting edge. Keep a look out !
 
De__eB said:
Went to website

Saw GW-510516 advertised as a "SARM"

Left.
Click to expand...

Peroxisome proliferator receptor modulator doesn't have the same ring and being that the Peroxisome proliferator receptors have a hand in the steroid receptors its the main reason that it is put into the class of sarms.
 
BigGame84 said:
There's a rumor going around on other forums that Platinum Nutra is run by the former owner of Shredded Labs. Supposedly there's emails to prove it. Just what I've heard.
Click to expand...

ah. I have read the same thing and asked our boss about it. I guess the rumor got started because the old owner wanted to invest in PN but they went a different direction. We are a completely different company. I remember SL had problems with one product and it killed their rep. Which is one of the reason that all of your good companies ( us included) test every batch of raw product that get to us. We also are giving getting away from the prop blends so that consumers know what they are getting.
 
BigGame84 said:
Is Platinum Nutra going to provide results of 3rd party testing of their products?
Click to expand...

It is something I will have to ask the boss about. But for now we will have to let the first round of logs speak for them selves
 
Rocket3015 said:
I just got a heads up and Platinum Nutraceuticals has a new supplement in the works that is cutting edge. Keep a look out !
Click to expand...

Back to being on topic who gave you this inside info? what info were you given that I wasn't lol
 
McCrew530 said:
Peroxisome proliferator receptor modulator doesn't have the same ring and being that the Peroxisome proliferator receptors have a hand in the steroid receptors its the main reason that it is put into the class of sarms.
Click to expand...

lol, by that logic, literally everything is a SARM.
 
ELROCK said:
It gets lumped in the SARM category mainly for convenience reasons.
Click to expand...


The convenience of unaware customers thinking it is actually a sarm and buying it?

That doesn't even make sense.

I guess we should rename xgels SARMgels or something, since apparently things thtat have no direct AR activity at all are called SARMs for convenience sake.
 
De__eB said:
The convenience of unaware customers thinking it is actually a sarm and buying it?

That doesn't even make sense.

I guess we should rename xgels SARMgels or something, since apparently things thtat have no direct AR activity at all are called SARMs for convenience sake.
Click to expand...
Im sensing some hostility. But for conversation sake what would you classify it as?
 
McCrew530 said:
Im sensing some hostility. But for conversation sake what would you classify it as?
Click to expand...

it's a PPAR agonist, I don't mean to be hostile, really, I just think that there's enough of a misinformation void surrounding a lot of research chems already without miscategorizing things.

PPAR agonists have different contraindications than SARMs. Now, most people who are utilizing research chemicals are for the most part diligent about making sure their lab rats don't have any conflicting issues.

But at a time when more of these investigational type compounds are making their way into more mainstream companies, these things are frontfacing to a much more naive group of customers than when rc products were more obscure.
There is also the huge gulf in the market where a lot of prohormones used to be, and with it a lot of the same naive irresponsible users that were making their way into case studies on steroid toxicity.

For those reasons, clear and accurate information is of utmost importance.

Just my take.
 
De__eB said:
it's a PPAR agonist, I don't mean to be hostile, really, I just think that there's enough of a misinformation void surrounding a lot of research chems already without miscategorizing things.

PPAR agonists have different contraindications than SARMs. Now, most people who are utilizing research chemicals are for the most part diligent about making sure their lab rats don't have any conflicting issues.

But at a time when more of these investigational type compounds are making their way into more mainstream companies, these things are frontfacing to a much more naive group of customers than when rc products were more obscure.
There is also the huge gulf in the market where a lot of prohormones used to be, and with it a lot of the same naive irresponsible users that were making their way into case studies on steroid toxicity.

For those reasons, clear and accurate information is of utmost importance.

Just my take.
Click to expand...

Good point.
 
Haha, noooooo, not me! :nono:
 
De__eB said:
it's a PPAR agonist, I don't mean to be hostile, really, I just think that there's enough of a misinformation void surrounding a lot of research chems already without miscategorizing things.

PPAR agonists have different contraindications than SARMs. Now, most people who are utilizing research chemicals are for the most part diligent about making sure their lab rats don't have any conflicting issues.

But at a time when more of these investigational type compounds are making their way into more mainstream companies, these things are frontfacing to a much more naive group of customers than when rc products were more obscure.
There is also the huge gulf in the market where a lot of prohormones used to be, and with it a lot of the same naive irresponsible users that were making their way into case studies on steroid toxicity.

For those reasons, clear and accurate information is of utmost importance.

Just my take.
Click to expand...

The web guy was supposed to have taken care of this issue, The label itself does not say SARM, it reads PPAR. We will get the new info added to the website to avoid these types of problems with consumers
 
PNutra said:
The web guy was supposed to have taken care of this issue, The label itself does not say SARM, it reads PPAR. We will get the new info added to the website to avoid these types of problems with consumers
Click to expand...

Thank you for setting the record straight Boss!
 
PNutra said:
If you want it you shall have, we test all our raws before production. I will make sure we get labs up in our section
Click to expand...
labs is where it's at. I hope more and more companies start doing this.
 
PNutra said:
If you want it you shall have, we test all our raws before production. I will make sure we get labs up in our section
Click to expand...

Just a friendly bump, I'm sure many would like to see these...when you get a min to post them :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top