Stenadrol vs. DMZ

Loneyboy

Banned
Looking into differences between the two. I understand that DMZ would be dryer, but would like some input on what results would be like in terms of size and strength.

Would run either with a base of 75mg of tr3st. 6 week cycle. Heavy bulking cals, going for as much size and strength as possible.
 
Heres acouple links to strong supplement shop on some info about both. Both of these PH's are great for bulk and size. Hope this helps.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
Some people like dmz more than msten and the other way around. What I get from it all is that msten is a better bulker, but dmz is better with recomping and strength
 
LeanEngineer said:
Heres acouple links to strong supplement shop on some info about both. Both of these PH's are great for bulk and size. Hope this helps.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

The info on the DMZ is good. I meant stenadrol as in methylstenbolone and dimethandrostenol. As in olymups' stenadrol. Does anyone here have any experience with both of these compounds and how they would fare in terms of bulking?
 
Abe Lincoln said:
Some people like dmz more than msten and the other way around. What I get from it all is that msten is a better bulker, but dmz is better with recomping and strength
Click to expand...

OK, that's some good info. I'm really interested in the strength aspect, size is second on my priorities. Would the dimethandrostenol in stenadrol benefit the strength gains?
 
Loneyboy said:
The info on the DMZ is good. I meant stenadrol as in methylstenbolone and dimethandrostenol. As in olymups' stenadrol. Does anyone here have any experience with both of these compounds and how they would fare in terms of bulking?
Click to expand...

Oh sorry about that.
Invalid Link Removed
 
Loneyboy said:
The info on the DMZ is good. I meant stenadrol as in methylstenbolone and dimethandrostenol. As in olymups' stenadrol. Does anyone here have any experience with both of these compounds and how they would fare in terms of bulking?
Click to expand...

I know tommurph ran a stenadrol log and put some serious size on with it.

Edit: Just saw you posted in there. Guess you already knew.
 
frankz2 said:
I know tommurph ran a stenadrol log and put some serious size on with it.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I've been following his log. Can't find a number on how much he's gained so far however. I do find msten very intriguing, but I suppose I am curious about the synergy of running dimethandrostenol alongside.
 
for what its worth, im 10 days into a solo dmz cycle by ironmag labs. so far its rather weak. only things i have noticed is my muscles are harder. thats really about it. no gains in strength yet. no lethargy, no back pump and normal BP. its only 10 days in. so it may not be in full effect. take it for what its worth.
 
clk said:
for what its worth, im 10 days into a solo dmz cycle by ironmag labs. so far its rather weak. only things i have noticed is my muscles are harder. thats really about it. no gains in strength yet. no lethargy, no back pump and normal BP. its only 10 days in. so it may not be in full effect. take it for what its worth.
Click to expand...

I've already ran a cycle of DMZ and loved it. Ended at 60mg and put on 16 pounds. Just looking to get some different compounds under my belt. What are you running that isn't impressing you? Maybe bump your dose up.
 
Loneyboy said:
I've already ran a cycle of DMZ and loved it. Ended at 60mg and put on 16 pounds. Just looking to get some different compounds under my belt. What are you running that isn't impressing you? Maybe bump your dose up.
Click to expand...

hmmm...well maybe i will have to up the dose then. how long did you run it for? so far the DMZ isnt impressing me.
 
clk said:
hmmm...well maybe i will have to up the dose then. how long did you run it for? so far the DMZ isnt impressing me.
Click to expand...

my cycle was DMZ: 30/30/40/40/60/60, Tr3st: 75/75/75/75/75/75
 
Stenadrol is a dry compound as well. Either would be a good choice, especially if paired with Tr3st, to put on some size and gain strength. Finishing a DMZ solo cycle myself and have gained 11 pounds, next to zero BF, and all lifts are up significantly. Eating at only 300-500 cals above maint.
 
Hey bro I've running Msten and Tren for 3/12 weeks now and I've put on 14 lbs. and strenght has went up drastically
 
jmyers said:
Hey bro I've running Msten and Tren for 3/12 weeks now and I've put on 14 lbs. and strenght has went up drastically
Click to expand...

**** bro those are some great gains! increase on big 3?
 
Yeah buddy!! All my lifts now have gone up b/t 15-90 lbs. and that's no joke bro. By the end of my first week some of my lifts were up by 10 lbs.
 
Some of the characteristics of Msten
- Increases Lean Muscle Mass
- Increases Strength & Power
- Helps with Cutting (getting lean)
- Does Not Aromatize (convert to estrogen)
- No Bloating or Water Retention
- Fuller Muscles
- Mind-Boggling Pumps
 
clk said:
for what its worth, im 10 days into a solo dmz cycle by ironmag labs. so far its rather weak. only things i have noticed is my muscles are harder. thats really about it. no gains in strength yet. no lethargy, no back pump and normal BP. its only 10 days in. so it may not be in full effect. take it for what its worth.
Click to expand...

Im starting week 3 of DMZ today (LGI)- strength went up at the end of week one, muscles are hard as shiet but no weight gain. I feel great in the gym but at this point I would have to say Triumphalis was superior. That **** made me look like I was on SD. Hoping DMZ in the next few days really starts to kick in.
 
good deal man! hopefully mine starts doing something. i upped the dose yesterday. i have felt absolutely nothing since ive started it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top