ams epi 1 test or lg cut andro kit

kenny76

kenny76

Member
Hey guys im trying to decide between the two for my first (and maybe only) ph cycle. I have narrowed it down between the two and i was hoping for some opinions on the two. my diet and training are in check. Not looking for anyone to lay out a cycle for me as i have done alot of research and asked alot of questions already, just opinions on effectiveness considering everything including cost. I am cutting/recomping.

the epi 1 test i would get 8 weeks and i think i would stagger it into 6 weeks, arom-x, erase, daa for pct with a serm on hand at a cost of $140 for the epi 1 and the arom x.

cut andro i would get two kits, run for 8 weeks with the form xt, errase, daa, and same serm on hand at a cost of about 250$ for the kit with form xt.

any opinions on the 2 would be greatly appreciated as the cost difference is significant.
also would run a liver support, thinking ai cycle support. thanks
 
Anyone? Opinions of those with some first hand use of either would be greatly appreciated as im trying to figure if the extra money for the cut andro kit would be worth it.
 
macdady said:
epi 1 test looks interesting actually. Just looked it up
Click to expand...

Yeah i thought so too. With that i would probably change to more of a recomp to a lean bulk, as opposed to more recomp with the cut andro. Leaning towards epi 1 at this point for half the money.
 
Lol why not just go for a epi clone? Or hdrol? Only one steroid for a first cycle. Instead of a stack
 
want to stay non methylated, and the logs i see on the epi 1 test i dont see most using a serm, even though i will have one just in case. im not trying to get real huge or anything just want to keep it simple and add some lean muscle after going from cut to recomp and back for the last 10 months, this last cut cycle im just finishing up now i have clearly lost some strength id like to regain.
 
Dude hdrol and epi are much cheaper and will give you so much better gains. Don't worry about them being methylated, they aren't harsh on the liver really at all.
 
Well that's just not very true. They are harsh on the liver, if he want non methyl leave home be. Atlwast he is smart and has a serm unlike most of the other people I've seen as of late. He will probably get hooked like the rest of us and graduate to the fun stuff later. Let him get his toes wet
 
amiller745 said:
Dude hdrol and epi are much cheaper and will give you so much better gains. Don't worry about them being methylated, they aren't harsh on the liver really at all.
Click to expand...

One of them would probably be the logical next step if i decide to cycle again
 
kenny76 said:
One of them would probably be the logical next step if i decide to cycle again
Click to expand...
I would suggest epi as your next venture if you choose lol... there's probably a hundred logs on here to learn from too so research for cycle layout and things you need on cycle and off would be a breeze
 
macdady said:
I would suggest epi as your next venture if you choose lol... there's probably a hundred logs on here to learn from too so research for cycle layout and things you need on cycle and off would be a breeze
Click to expand...

Ive read up on the various forms of epi quite a bit already. Seems like i would be fine with it, but like you said i really just wanna get my feet wet first.
 
macdady said:
Well that's just not very true. They are harsh on the liver, if he want non methyl leave home be. Atlwast he is smart and has a serm unlike most of the other people I've seen as of late. He will probably get hooked like the rest of us and graduate to the fun stuff later. Let him get his toes wet
Click to expand...

I feel like liver toxicity is over exaggerated. I mean, saying that epi and halo are liver toxic is a dumb reason not to run them.
 
My decision was between ams epi 1 and forerunner alpha hard (epi). I chose alpha hard.

1 andro and alpha hard and then a pct. I have a test base also (rise and swell).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top