Philshred said:Sat in the subaru brz and there isn't much space inside. I'm aware that the space is the same as the scion frs though. As far as I know the Subaru brz is slightly more expensive and has more options than the frs. However it's really frustrating how much nicer the Toyota gt 86 is than both of them. Does anyone know why the hell it's not sold in NA? But imo the brz interior is very nice!
Philshred said:Funny you mentioned the Acura Rsx, it's one of my all time favs haha. How are you planning to drive in the snow with a rwd btw?
carpee said:I HAD to read this thread :/
I have an 05 rsx type-s and love it but now I'm online building the brz and seeing if I can afford it...great.
carpee said:I would trade in the rsx and probably put down an extra 1,000
supermanjow said:They are essentially the same car with the Scion being considerably cheaper.
carpee said:I'd go suby just for the winter fun
supermanjow said:Wouldn't make a lick of difference because they are both rear wheel drive.
carpee said:I dunno why I was under the impression it was all wheel drive.
I thought that's why Subaru brought it out.
![]()
mstep said:suby all day, man i miss my wrx. the brz is just awesome, only thing that woulda made it better was if it was a 2.0 turbo but cant complain considering it has one of the lsd's. that thing can drift like a horse runnin on an icey road with a glue truck behind him
and my excitement is back up hahah.
supermanjow said:Neither is all wheel drive. I don't know where you're getting your info. I've watched this car since its inception. When I found out they got rid of the AWD on it I immediately lost interest. Subaru actually worked in conjunction with Toyota to produce the Scion. It is built on the same platform and is essentially the same car. I've read multiple comparison/test drive articles that essentially boiled down to the Scion is more stylish and costs considerably less. So you get more bang for your buck with the Scion.
hvactech said:FRS is cool but the high compression puts a frown on my face
Neither is all wheel drive. I don't know where you're getting your info. I've watched this car since its inception. When I found out they got rid of the AWD on it I immediately lost interest. Subaru actually worked in conjunction with Toyota to produce the Scion. It is built on the same platform and is essentially the same car. I've read multiple comparison/test drive articles that essentially boiled down to the Scion is more stylish and costs considerably less. So you get more bang for your buck with the Scion.
I haven't test driven one yet, but their AWD is so good that its hard to break from it. I still really like it, and RWD makes sense for it. But for those of us in northern climates that love and depend upon their AWD in the winter RWD puts a little damper on it. I would like to see a winter driving review of its traction control. I know on the Chrysler 300 Car and Driver rated their RWD and traction control ahead of many FWD cars. If their TC is pretty good it's not as big of a deal under fairly normal winter driving conditions.
mstep said:u can always get winter tires, my suby had trash traction in winter and never ended pickin up winter tires. always had to rely on the hand brake (since i didnt have tractional control either) for a turn or i understeer straight into the car in my turning direction. anythin with axles in the front is horrible in the winter unless u got, traction control with winter tires or just winter tires. i hate how people think fwd is so much better than rwd in winter....or anytime of the year. just picked up a mazda proto5 and i kant stand the fwd, im afraid of the winter and sometimes when it rains, gotta pick up some new tires. anyway, its ur decision on which ud choose man as long as ur happy with it
supermanjow said:Wouldn't make a lick of difference because they are both rear wheel drive.
Philshred said:I was really interesting in getting the scion frs however I don't fit inside. Instead I'm now looking at used evo's and sti's no older then 2008. Does anyone have any advice or experience with any of these cars? Thanks!
carpee said:I've heard expensive repairs.
I'm kinda looking in the same market. I want an sti.
Yeah the sti has a much nicer interior imo with the red stitching and everything how ever it's not as roomy inside. I was also told that you only get a 6 month warranty when you buy the sti compared to the evo which is much better."salesman at mitsubishi dealership"
Frank Reynolds said:Slap the salesman that told you that..lol You get the full 3yr/36k bumper to bumper when you buy an STI.. I have owned a half a dozen of these cars. Also owned an EVO.
Both awesome cars. Depending what you are looking to get out of the car, and what you plan to do to/with it, would dictate which I would recommend.
Sti by far is better for daily driving if you don't plan to mod it much.daily driver and 'some' fun mostly in the winter...
I found and 05 sti for 15k haha. good shape just high miles
I was really interesting in getting the scion frs however I don't fit inside. Instead I'm now looking at used evo's and sti's no older then 2008. Does anyone have any advice or experience with any of these cars? Thanks!
Frank Reynolds said:Slap the salesman that told you that..lol You get the full 3yr/36k bumper to bumper when you buy an STI.. I have owned a half a dozen of these cars. Also owned an EVO.
Both awesome cars. Depending what you are looking to get out of the car, and what you plan to do to/with it, would dictate which I would recommend.
Evo's are awesome cars man.Haha thanks for the info. I was actually quite shocked when he said that. Sadly enough I have to pick between the two the evo just due to the fact that it's the only one I fit in. Nonetheless I really like the evo even though the interior is a bit bland but I won't mind making some changes to improve it![]()
mstep said:if u go sti, stayay away from 08 unless they had another engine put in under warranty. the 08s had ringland issues since it was the first of the hatches. also the evo's always had better handling stock(subys understeer) but just get some thicker sway bars and problem fixed
hvactech said:i prefer the sti over the evo for a number of reasons.
Are you planning on getting an X, or 8/9?Hey thanks for letting me know! So far the Evo i my number 1 pickIts been one of my favs for a very long time. I blame The Fast and the Furious haha
Would be interested to hear your thoughts big guy!
Frank Reynolds said:Are you planning on getting an X, or 8/9?
Boo to the MR..hahaPlanning on an x. My price range is around 30k and with that I can find an mr in very good condition with no more then 35,000kmIm scouting atm for one with no mods and color wise blue or silver.
hvactech said:well for simpler reasons the market where im at doesnt favor evo's, huge resale cost for extremely high miles, also every one i knew that owned one had problems occur when launching even at low rpm's. lastly i think its completely over rated but thats just my personal opinion. im more of toyota and bmw guy these days.
Frank Reynolds said:Boo to the MR..haha
Haha is that due to the slower 0-60? Because from what I understand it's faster on a track.
hvactech said:i have read and heard of numerous gearbox problems but cant answer the warranty question. browse the evo forums for a bit.