Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Good news for 1,3....GO USPLABS! :)

Thank You for sharing NP... This is more than USPlabs, more than an ingredient; This is a step forward for the entire industry.
 
You are exactly right and you guys are now (and have been) my heroes! Keep up the great work! It definitely benefits us all!
 
im just glad some one is fighting this. big pharma really has to much control imo.
 
One more study has been submitted....

Probably is the INDUSTRY doesn't care about the science....I give DMAA 6 months (much longer than the hate began 2 years ago!). I hope that I'm wrong...

Don't blame the establishment(government) here blame the competition......
 
Here is just my thought. If the government deems DMAA is not in Geranium (when in fact it is)- Would there be anything illeagle about using 'concerntrated Geranium oil' in the ingredients which is essentially an extract for DMAA. It would mean you could not use synthaised geranium but it would mean you could use the extract.
 
borobulker said:
Thank You for sharing NP... This is more than USPlabs, more than an ingredient; This is a step forward for the entire industry.
Click to expand...

Great post!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top