vkg1
Member
Can anyone tell me why it is not common to simply take an aromatase inhibitor to counteract the natural increase in aromatase enzyme during the early years of dropping free T that comes naturally with aging?
I am 35 and have much lower libido than I did a few years ago. I also seem to exhibit all the classic symptoms of low T. Likewise, I have all the classic changes of my bosy that are associated with increasing estrogen/aromatase. My T tests fine. It makes me wonder if I could just lower aromatase it wouldn't have the same effect as turing back the clock to when I did not have these symptoms (ie my aromatase was lower).
Please correct me if my premise is flawed. My notion is that our free T starts to drop with aging first largely as a result of aromatase levels increasing. Therefore, it seems logical to me that a key to extending one's youth free-T-wise, would be to keep aromatase levels low as when younger. I wonder, then, if it would be a good idea for me to consider some kind of treatment with regular low-level doseage of an AI.
I am 35 and have much lower libido than I did a few years ago. I also seem to exhibit all the classic symptoms of low T. Likewise, I have all the classic changes of my bosy that are associated with increasing estrogen/aromatase. My T tests fine. It makes me wonder if I could just lower aromatase it wouldn't have the same effect as turing back the clock to when I did not have these symptoms (ie my aromatase was lower).
Please correct me if my premise is flawed. My notion is that our free T starts to drop with aging first largely as a result of aromatase levels increasing. Therefore, it seems logical to me that a key to extending one's youth free-T-wise, would be to keep aromatase levels low as when younger. I wonder, then, if it would be a good idea for me to consider some kind of treatment with regular low-level doseage of an AI.