HDRol has the same sides...some more severe..especially back pumps..puffy/sensitive nipples, etc...
Furaza...not even close to a comparable compound. It's non-methyl and not even used for the same thing... Hardly effective solo and the manufacturers admit that. I'm running it right now with Epi and I haven't noticed much of anything at up to 350mg...
1-AD and -4-AD... I'm by far no expert on these compounds but the searching I've done show they has significant sides also.
Osta RX- Not even a standard PH or AAS. Do some more research. It's very mild on the balls and doesn't have nearly the suppression of an AAS or PH. However, it does have sides and although they may not be as severe as Epi, Osta is very new and still very misunderstood. For god sakes, there are arguments everyday across the forums on proper dosing and dosing procedures. According to it's first commercial manufacturer " A SARM is exactly what it sounds like: a compound (not an anabolic steroid) which has the ability to stimulate the androgen receptor (much the same way as anabolic steroids). "
Cliffnote: You argument isn't nearly as valid as I thought it was going to be. You picked 5 compounds and only one or two were the same style compound as Epistane. Since it's a kinder, happier world these days I will say your opinions do matter but my results prove the positive effects of the compound I'm arguing for.