If I am unable to find a training partner to spot me for bench press, would a smith machine bench be an effective alternative? I always do dumbbell bench press after barbell bench to work my stabilizer muscles.
rckvl7 said:No. Bench inside a power rack. Granted you still won't have someone to help lift off, but you won't be in danger of getting stapled under the weight. Smith Machines are a travesty.
The increased stability on the smith press is going to change up the way your muscles are recruited to perform the motion. Smith machines aren't interchangeable with the bench press.
Believe it or not, the smith machine was actually a prototype to the modern day leg press. I've never seen anyone use them for their originally intended purpose.
I don't think it sucks. Just overrated.
I mainly dislike it when I see people doing squats on it, as it leads way to awfully botched form, increased egos, and accelerated joint degradation. But then I pause for a moment and remind myself, hey, at least they're making the attempt to work legs.
Dorian Yates used it almost exclusively(for legs) to win the O. If it works use it I say. Personally I don't, but I like doing free ATG squats quite a bit. Most people are embarrassed to work legs and rightly so, its usually the worst body part haha.
Dorian Yates also knew how to squat![]()
Dexter Jackson does the same thing. In the case of bodybuilding (as finesse as it sometimes seems) the lacking lateral motion prevents stabilizing muscular development along the torso, leading to a smaller waist. Naturally, this makes the sweep, the lats, and the shoulders look bigger.
The people I have in mind don't quite fit in this category. Instead they are novice, don't know how to squat, and use the smith machine for fear of getting caught underneath the bar. The problem of course is that they tend to develop really bad form. Also, the term ATG doesn't quite come into play with the particular stereotype I have in mind; if you don't know how to squat, chances are you haven't figured out the difference between parallel and a 90 degree bend in your knee, let alone the concept of going below parallel.![]()
Yea I agree with you, he did know how to squat first, then utilized that knowledge to focus on different parts of the leg muscle. He said his legs never grew till he did that. I know the people whom you speak of as well haha, 3/4 squats on the smith by rail thin legs...same thing on the leg press. Its like hey..your not fooling anyone here lol.
The majority of bodybuilders these days seem to rely on machines to get the job done. I think the technology behind some of these newer machines, like hammer strength, have found a fairly happy medium between isolating the primary muscles and keeping the exercise a compound motion. It works wonders for building size, but I wouldn't quite recommend it for functional strength. Naturally, Dorian's testimony about how his legs never grew until he did that is a primary example.
If I am unable to find a training partner to spot me for bench press, would a smith machine bench be an effective alternative? I always do dumbbell bench press after barbell bench to work my stabilizer muscles.