Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Promagnon 25 cycle...out of the woodworks

17amethyl

Member
hey guys,
as you can see new member, but certainly not new to the forum...been here for years...

anyhow, i will be running my 2nd promagnon cycle sometime in these upcoming weeks, however i will be dosing it differently
my previous cycle: i dosed it at 50mgs for 4 weeks, with proper pct, i gained roughly 8lbs of lean body mass and kept my gains...this time around, I may work up to 75mgs but will not exceed this amount, some users have went to 100mg, but i am not going to push the dosage on this methyl...for those unfamiliar with promagnon, its incredible in terms of strength and rips u to shreds, but in terms of putting on mass...not the best

i did put on about 20lbs on my bench in the cycle-->295x3 to 315x3
and my deadlift went from around 365x4 to 405x4...i should mention diet was on point, calories kept high, and pct was proper
most users complain they gain no "noticable" muscle on cycle, but it does create this misleading illusion since u significantly drop bf while putting on lean muscle gains...so you could say its a suitable recomp

in terms of advice, i'm seeking a little more in terms of this cycle...have been researching what other prohormones i could stack with this while on cycle that are not methylated (PM is methylated, not very harsh, but its toxic) in order to add some size gains to this cycle...almost considered 4-ad but its reviews are not promising

was wondering if you guys have any suggestions...if you guys are curious/interested to see how the cycle goes, i will start it as soon as my nolva comes in the mail, which should be less than 2 weeks...if enough people are interested ill record a thorough log
PCT will include:
Nolva, Activate Xtreme, Liver Support, & 6 oxo (might leave this out, the nolva might suffice)
 
hey, iam front loading a EQ and test E cycle with promagnon-25 for 4 weeks at 50mg and the last 4 days at 75mg's.....so far cycle is great....

as for your question, try to look for some cyclotren, it is non-methylated and will put on some lean mass.
 
nice...appreciate the advice
i was thinking of doing a similar test e/magnon cycle myself...glad to hear ur cycle is going well, props
ill look into cyclotren
 
How does promagnon compare to Hdrol?

You could probably stack it with 3AD (depending on what you think of it..)
 
i envy you. my first cycle was promag. i loved it. you said it didnt really put on mass well...it did on me. i have fond memories of those pink weird shaped pills. GL on your cycle!
 
yeah as already said, magnon is similar in nature to hdrol but lilpsych hit the point that its seemingly more androgenic...
in terms of results, i cant speak for hdrol since ive never tried it, but magnon produces very dry lean muscle gains- its excellent in terms of recomp effect, ive always been a person with good size, but a 4 week magnon cycle left me shredded- i never saw cable veins on my lats until taking this lol
ive had my eye on 3ad despite mixed reviews but price kinda hurts the idea & bold seems like an afforable alternative- is bold a progestin?
 
17amethyl said:
yeah as already said, magnon is similar in nature to hdrol but lilpsych hit the point that its seemingly more androgenic...
in terms of results, i cant speak for hdrol since ive never tried it, but magnon produces very dry lean muscle gains- its excellent in terms of recomp effect, ive always been a person with good size, but a 4 week magnon cycle left me shredded- i never saw cable veins on my lats until taking this lol
ive had my eye on 3ad despite mixed reviews but price kinda hurts the idea & bold seems like an afforable alternative- is bold a progestin?
Click to expand...


no it is not a progestin. And it is pretty close in price to 3AD, so its really a toss up between the two.
 
ive narrowed it down to bold, 3ad, and furazadrol

my thoughts: PM is pretty dry itself, and so is furazadrol from my research...so stacking the 2 together would be pretty dam harsh on the joints (even with fish/flax/joint support that i have)...though the androgenic to anabolic combination of PM and furaz seems somewhat favorable
3 ad is somewhat a wet compound, decent choice with decent reviews, and ill say it again, its pricey, more so than bold and furaz from the sources i have available...
and bold- chemically it seems to also be a somewhat wet compound though its reviews indicate a recomping effect...plus its effects are best seen in 6-8 week cycles, in which case shutdown is hard, coupled with the mild shutdown of PM- eh i dno

trying to make a decision and make orders before my nolva comes in, should only be another week at most...

anyhow if you guys have anymore suggestions/advice from now until then im all ears
looking for: non methylated ph/oral steroids to stack with PM, that is not a progestin...and probably a mildly wet compound
 
I've got a bottle of H-roid (promagnon clone) I plan on running soon. Keep hearing it is more androgenic than anabolic. My question is which is more desireable. I've read the definition of both and have to admit I am a bit confused.

Previously ran Epistane
Currently dosing 1-T
 
typically you want a 1:1 ration anabolic to androgenic, but newer ph/ds are aiming for higher anabolic to androgenic ratio- so to maximize positive results and minimize undesirable side effects. anabolic can be simply thought of a building effect/growth effect within your muscles and increased androgenic can be summarized as increased function/involvement of male sex hormones, which a positive side effect often is muslce growth
promagnon is solid, esp if your goals are to cut and increase strength. some argue other compounds have better anabolic:androgenic ratio but i can say that the gains are solid, promising, easy to keep, and with little sides

still waiting for the nolva in the mail and looking for a good stacker meantime to add some mass to the cycle...
 
17amethyl said:
typically you want a 1:1 ration anabolic to androgenic, but newer ph/ds are aiming for higher anabolic to androgenic ratio- so to maximize positive results and minimize undesirable side effects. anabolic can be simply thought of a building effect/growth effect within your muscles and increased androgenic can be summarized as increased function/involvement of male sex hormones, which a positive side effect often is muslce growth
promagnon is solid, esp if your goals are to cut and increase strength. some argue other compounds have better anabolic:androgenic ratio but i can say that the gains are solid, promising, easy to keep, and with little sides

still waiting for the nolva in the mail and looking for a good stacker meantime to add some mass to the cycle...[/QUOTE

Thanx, I understand the concepts between the 2 but what are the actual noticeable results in the human body between the 2. Eg. is androgenic boosting my own hormones where anabolic is more like ADDING external test etc. and if that is the case wouldn't artificially boosting my own hormone production cause more sides?

Sorry if I am not getting this right away.
Click to expand...
 
hey, you should probably just make a brief thread with this question, your questions will get a lot more recognition and more thorough explanations than i could offer/those only viewing this for purposes of promagnon
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top