m trn 1.5mgs
Trenadrol 30mg`s Invalid Link Removed
its not realy the same is it?
No. Trenadrol is a dienolone precursor. No one is sure what M-TRN actually is. I believe Patrick Arnold & Matt Cahill say it is actually 17b-methoxy-trenbolone, but don't quote me on that...
Also, it's against the forum rules to post a link to another online store, as Nutraplanet is the Official store of AM.com.
Do you happen to have a link to that?Trenadrol was also tested by PA. Its wasn't pro-dienelone. It had an MW of 288 I think (same as Trenbolone IIRC). Those who have run trenadrol seem to agree!! Its also labeled 17b-methoxy-trienbolone, which I have been lead to believe is not a logical nomenclature. Same goes for m-trn
Do you happen to have a link to that?
A Kilo rep stated that it was prodienolone, and it's also dosed the same as other prodienolone products. A ton of steroids have similar and even the same MW, including 288. I believe testosterone has a MW of 288.
Do you happen to have a link to that?
A Kilo rep stated that it was prodienolone, and it's also dosed the same as other prodienolone products. A ton of steroids have similar and even the same MW, including 288. I believe testosterone has a MW of 288.
I actually have a few bottles of trenadrol and am about to stack it with CEL Hdrol...anyone have good results from trenadrol...thanks guys
I loved it except for the fact it killed my cardiovascular endurance and gave me gyno (which I'm currently successfully treating with letro). It kicks in fast and allowed me to hit several PR's before I had to can it. Just watch the sides and raise the dose slowly if you decide to run it....basically, know this stuff has VERY strong effects on your body, both positive and negative.
u know anything about xtreme tren? wat dose did u run trenadrol?
I can't believe you made me go there to search for that... my head hurts now.Its on the BB forums. It may not have MW 288 (it was something like that though). The MW didnt match up to what it should have been when tested.
I saw it was said that trenadrol has a MW of 270, but that does not mean it had the same peaks as trenbolone, so it didn't exactly "match" tren. Epistane has a MW of 270, too.tnick7 said:It matched up to trenbolone.
There were also emails from Kilo employees posted that state it is "estra-4,9." Granted, that could imply it's a 3,17-dione like the other "Tren" products, or that could only be a small piece of the nomenclature. Perhaps it is methylated, and is a methyldienolone precursor. The dose seems kind of high, and I have used neither, so we would need someone that has to be able to compare them.tnick7 said:The daughter of the owner of Kilosports also posted on DA stating that it in fact was methylated!
I can't believe you made me go there to search for that... my head hurts now.
You are right about the molecular weight difference. Trenadrol supposedly tested at 270, while estra-4,9-diene-3,17-dione is 280 (I believe).
On the other hand, PA seemed to confuse the "estra-4,9" products and the "methoxy-trn" products as far as which one is which...
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
I saw it was said that trenadrol has a MW of 270, but that does not mean it had the same peaks as trenbolone, so it didn't exactly "match" tren. Epistane has a MW of 270, too.
There were also emails from Kilo employees posted that state it is "estra-4,9." Granted, that could imply it's a 3,17-dione like the other "Tren" products, or that could only be a small piece of the nomenclature. Perhaps it is methylated, and is a methyldienolone precursor. The dose seems kind of high, and I have used neither, so we would need someone that has to be able to compare them.
Did they actually say estra-4,9-diene-3,17-dione, or just "estra-4,9?" I'm wondering if the nomenclature may contain estra-4,9, but be something other than the prodienolone products that keep popping up (such as having a 17a-methyl or a methoxy ether, etc.)...? :think: