Breaking up a large meal... beneficial? - AnabolicMinds.com

Breaking up a large meal... beneficial?

  1. hypo's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    524
    Rep Power
    422

    Reputation

    Breaking up a large meal... beneficial?


    I have a habit of cooking a lot of food at one time, and slowly picking on it over the next few hours. For example, I'll cook up half a pack of chicken breast tenderloins on the george foreman grill and a cup or two of brown rice and eat 2 or 3 meals from it about an hour or two apart from one another.

    I know breaking up meals increases metabolism, but how far should you space your meals apart? And also is there a point when further dividing your meals will be pointless? For instance, 6 meals a day is all the seperation you need and 10 a day won't be any better.

    Thanks for any views!

  2. NPursuit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,782
    Rep Power
    1032

    Reputation

    There was a discussion about this a year or so ago, and basically the research people posted up concluded eating small amounts of food continuously throughout the day was pointless.
  3. RobInKuwait's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  269 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,272
    Rep Power
    1263

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by NPursuit
    There was a discussion about this a year or so ago, and basically the research people posted up concluded eating small amounts of food continuously throughout the day was pointless.
    What is the ideal spacing between meals?
    •   
       

  4. milwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Age
    48
    Posts
    2,460
    Rep Power
    1404

    Reputation

    eat something at least every 3 hours and include protein of some kind.
  5. RobInKuwait's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  269 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,272
    Rep Power
    1263

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by milwood
    eat something at least every 3 hours and include protein of some kind.
    I guess my question should have been: Why is a shorter time period between meals not better?
  6. dsl
    dsl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    29
    Posts
    630
    Rep Power
    441

    Reputation

    it takes the body 2-3 hours to digest a meal. so if u eat say, every 2.5 hours, then u will keep keep your metabolism at its peak. eat every hour and u will not succeed at raising your metabolism above its peak.
  7. RobInKuwait's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  269 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,272
    Rep Power
    1263

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by dsl
    it takes the body 2-3 hours to digest a meal. so if u eat say, every 2.5 hours, then u will keep keep your metabolism at its peak. eat every hour and u will not succeed at raising your metabolism above its peak.
    So are you saying that, theres no disadvantage to snacking all through the day, but theres also no real advantage......or that eating every 2-3 hours is superior to snacking through the day?

    I'm curious because often times I eat every hour, especially on training days. I've read that the 4 hours after you work out is the best time to metabolize food, and that its good to have 3 meals (including the PWO shake) during that time. I realize that a shake metabolizes in less time than solid food, but the other two whole food meals would metabolically overlap each other.
  8. exnihilo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,577
    Rep Power
    923

    Reputation

    Well, there is no increase in resting calorie expenditure (i.e. metabolism) from eating frequently. The clown is a big fan of it though so there is probably some benefit to be derived from it.
  9. dsl
    dsl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    29
    Posts
    630
    Rep Power
    441

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by RobInKuwait
    So are you saying that, theres no disadvantage to snacking all through the day, but theres also no real advantage......or that eating every 2-3 hours is superior to snacking through the day?

    I'm curious because often times I eat every hour, especially on training days. I've read that the 4 hours after you work out is the best time to metabolize food, and that its good to have 3 meals (including the PWO shake) during that time. I realize that a shake metabolizes in less time than solid food, but the other two whole food meals would metabolically overlap each other.
    well, i personally wouldn't want to graze all day-i like to get full. but from a physiological point i can't answer this . i can only rationalize that i would want to get all my calories from a meal at once rather that guess my body's rate of digestion.

    and yes, your body is primed to shuttle nutrients to your body after a workout. and i have always read to have a post-workout shake, then a meal 1 hour after. And to resume normal eating times after (which should make the 3rd meal less than 4 hours after working out).
  10. Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7016

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by dsl
    it takes the body 2-3 hours to digest a meal. so if u eat say, every 2.5 hours, then u will keep keep your metabolism at its peak. eat every hour and u will not succeed at raising your metabolism above its peak.
    You can't put any type of number on digestion. Some meals can take as long as 9 hours while other take 30-45 minutes.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  11. Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7016

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by RobInKuwait
    So are you saying that, theres no disadvantage to snacking all through the day, but theres also no real advantage......or that eating every 2-3 hours is superior to snacking through the day?

    I'm curious because often times I eat every hour, especially on training days. I've read that the 4 hours after you work out is the best time to metabolize food, and that its good to have 3 meals (including the PWO shake) during that time. I realize that a shake metabolizes in less time than solid food, but the other two whole food meals would metabolically overlap each other.
    It depends on what you're snaching on. If you eating high fats foods then it is rather pointless as the time it takes to breakdown fats and oxidize them will always overlap. However if you are eating a fairly clean diet I found great benefits in terms of overall mood, satiety and general energy levels. I beleive even though it might not have any effect on BMR I think it has several benefits on how the body utilize nutrients. The body can only utlize so many calories at one time. Even though metabolism might not be increased (I still think it does to an extent) the partitioning effect IMO is much better this way. The results I have seen greatly favor eating smaller meals with more frequency.
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  12. RobInKuwait's Avatar
    Stats
    6'4"  269 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    35
    Posts
    2,272
    Rep Power
    1263

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobo
    It depends on what you're snaching on. If you eating high fats foods then it is rather pointless as the time it takes to breakdown fats and oxidize them will always overlap. However if you are eating a fairly clean diet I found great benefits in terms of overall mood, satiety and general energy levels. I beleive even though it might not have any effect on BMR I think it has several benefits on how the body utilize nutrients. The body can only utlize so many calories at one time. Even though metabolism might not be increased (I still think it does to an extent) the partitioning effect IMO is much better this way. The results I have seen greatly favor eating smaller meals with more frequency.
    Sounds good. Thanks for the info Bobo!
  13. hypo's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    524
    Rep Power
    422

    Reputation

    putting a 2-3 hour stamp on digestion, like bobo said, isn't really too practical. Small meals will take less time, as will high GI carbs and fast absorbing proteins like whey.

    I guess I'll just keep doing what I'm doing, if you couldn't tell I'm in college with time to kill so that's the only reason I can eat every hour
  14. dsl
    dsl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Age
    29
    Posts
    630
    Rep Power
    441

    Reputation

    well , guess that u live and learn right?


    I'm curious, Bobo, if u have had any of your clients start eating 7 or 8 times a day to see if it helped them burn fat any better. Or is this really just too much?

    *don't answer if it will give away any of your trademark secrets*
  15. Dwight Schrute's Avatar
    Stats
    6'1"  221 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    41
    Posts
    12,911
    Rep Power
    7016

    Reputation

    Not really. I stick to 6. I don't tihnk increasing by only 1 or 2 is going to make too much of a difference (but you never know!!)
    For answers to board issues, read the Suggestion and News forum at the bottom of the main page.
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. breaking up clumps in CEE
    By TNASTYII in forum Supplements
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-21-2008, 10:11 AM
  2. Grace period following a break-up
    By Rodja in forum General Chat
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-18-2007, 06:13 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-12-2006, 04:32 PM
  4. Break up letter...
    By refrieddreams in forum General Chat
    Replies: 182
    Last Post: 05-05-2006, 03:16 PM
  5. on the flip side...best break up songs
    By GQsuperman#2 in forum General Chat
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 08-20-2005, 08:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in