an analysis of chemical nomenclature of jungle warfare - AnabolicMinds.com

an analysis of chemical nomenclature of jungle warfare

Page 1 of 11 1236 ... Last
  1. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    an analysis of chemical nomenclature of jungle warfare


    I hear this product name all the time. people are always asking me if they can stack ergopharm products with jungle warfare. so i had to look it up and figure out what it is, or what its primary active is at least

    reading the label i noticed that it was very evasive, secretive. They obviously are not concerned about FDA labelling laws cuz they violated them left and right. I also think it is doing a disservice to consumers to make every ingredient a mystery. Yes i went this way briefly with AMP when it first came out, but last year changed it to a more descriptive label

    anyway, the mystery compound here is

    17-Alkyl-4-Delta-5a-Dehydro-Etiocholan-1,6-Dien-3-One)


    this chemical name makes no sense. Alkyl refers to a hydrocarbon chain in gerneral. alkyl can mean anththing from methyl or ethyl to cyclopentyl to undecanyl to butyryl. But in my opinion it probably means methyl in this case, and they used alkyl just to be sneaky

    the next confusing aspect of this name is "4-delta-5a". Either the person that put this in the name does not understand steroid chemistry or they did not care. Bottom line, 4-delta means a double bond at the 4,5-position. 5a means there is a hydrogen atom at the 5alpha position. You cannot have both a double bond at 4,5 and a hydrogen at 5alpha. you will exceed the valence of the 5 carbon.

    then you have the dehydro abbreviation stuck in there at an awkward location in the name. i will just ignore that cuz its senseless

    the name etiocholan is next. it simply means androstan. it is common in the industry to substitute androstan with etiocholan.

    then you have 1,6-dien-3-one. Finally, some chemical nomenclature that actually makes sense. this means double bonds at 1 and 6 and a ketone at 3.

    the very odd thing about this name is that there is no reference to 17-beta hydroxyl group. All androgenic based products - whether they are anabolics, aromatase inhibitors, or dhea like compounds - have oxygen atoms at 17. So i assume it was just left out of the name either by mistake or for some reason that god only knows.


    so bottom line, i would guess it is 17alpha-methyl-1,4,6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one.

    so its a methylated version of ATD

    so this is my message to ALRI

    WHY NOT JUST PUT A NORMAL NAME IN THE INGREDIENT LIST. IF YOU NEED HELP WITH CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE FOR YOU LABELS THEN JUST ASK ME. I WOULD RATHER TAKE THE TIME OUT TO HELP YOU THEN HAVE TO CRINGE AT THE MUTILATED RESULT

  2. Lift Heavy
    bLacKjAck.'s Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  241 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,949
    Rep Power
    2082

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Arnold View Post
    I hear this product name all the time. people are always asking me if they can stack ergopharm products with jungle warfare. so i had to look it up and figure out what it is, or what its primary active is at least

    reading the label i noticed that it was very evasive, secretive. They obviously are not concerned about FDA labelling laws cuz they violated them left and right. I also think it is doing a disservice to consumers to make every ingredient a mystery. Yes i went this way briefly with AMP when it first came out, but last year changed it to a more descriptive label

    anyway, the mystery compound here is

    17-Alkyl-4-Delta-5a-Dehydro-Etiocholan-1,6-Dien-3-One)


    this chemical name makes no sense. Alkyl refers to a hydrocarbon chain in gerneral. alkyl can mean anththing from methyl or ethyl to cyclopentyl to undecanyl to butyryl. But in my opinion it probably means methyl in this case, and they used alkyl just to be sneaky

    the next confusing aspect of this name is "4-delta-5a". Either the person that put this in the name does not understand steroid chemistry or they did not care. Bottom line, 4-delta means a double bond at the 4,5-position. 5a means there is a hydrogen atom at the 5alpha position. You cannot have both a double bond at 4,5 and a hydrogen at 5alpha. you will exceed the valence of the 5 carbon.

    then you have the dehydro abbreviation stuck in there at an awkward location in the name. i will just ignore that cuz its senseless

    the name etiocholan is next. it simply means androstan. it is common in the industry to substitute androstan with etiocholan.

    then you have 1,6-dien-3-one. Finally, some chemical nomenclature that actually makes sense. this means double bonds at 1 and 6 and a ketone at 3.

    the very odd thing about this name is that there is no reference to 17-beta hydroxyl group. All androgenic based products - whether they are anabolics, aromatase inhibitors, or dhea like compounds - have oxygen atoms at 17. So i assume it was just left out of the name either by mistake or for some reason that god only knows.


    so bottom line, i would guess it is 17alpha-methyl-1,4,6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one.

    so its a methylated version of ATD

    so this is my message to ALRI

    WHY NOT JUST PUT A NORMAL NAME IN THE INGREDIENT LIST. IF YOU NEED HELP WITH CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE FOR YOU LABELS THEN JUST ASK ME. I WOULD RATHER TAKE THE TIME OUT TO HELP YOU THEN HAVE TO CRINGE AT THE MUTILATED RESULT
    Hmmm, I can vouch for this product in that it works and works very well at that. Nice catch none the less though PA.
  3. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Gixxer82 View Post
    so in reality, its really nothing all that special?
    special is in the eye of the beholder i guess


    if my deciphering of the name represents the first time that consumers actually realize what this product contains then that really makes you scratch your chin doesn't it


    especially considering the fact that it is extremely popular

    i have to ask, why has nobody ever demanded to know what the chemical was and what was the background that suggests it is effective?
    •   
       

  4. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by bLacKjAck. View Post
    Hmmm, I can vouch for this product in that it works and works very well at that. Nice catch none the less though PA.

    what does this product do for you
  5. Elite Member
    jmh80's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,110
    Rep Power
    9661

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Arnold View Post
    WHY NOT JUST PUT A NORMAL NAME IN THE INGREDIENT LIST. IF YOU NEED HELP WITH CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE FOR YOU LABELS THEN JUST ASK ME. I WOULD RATHER TAKE THE TIME OUT TO HELP YOU THEN HAVE TO CRINGE AT THE MUTILATED RESULT
    You sir, are a good scientist. I like this.
  6. Board Moderator
    Unbreakable
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,709
    Rep Power
    986895

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Hi Patrick,

    I completely understand what you are getting at.

    Would you not agree with me that the following verbage:
    "very evasive, secretive"
    "obviously are not concerned about FDA labelling laws"
    "disservice to consumers"
    "just to be sneaky"
    "does not understand steroid chemistry or they did not care"
    "cuz its senseless"

    is more accusational and antagonizing rather than inquisitive or curious?

    You go on to say:
    "IF YOU NEED HELP WITH CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE FOR YOU LABELS THEN JUST ASK ME."

    Is it your desire to embrace or to allienate. You are a tremendous asset to the entire industry. Sometimes the approach is just so damned attacking and insinuating rather than inquisitive. I know it's your MO, but for goodness sake Patrick. Save our board the drama...again.

    Lets give the folks who make the product some time to explain themselves before the whole damn peanut gallery jumps in with their two cents.

    Please play nice. We really love having you here Patrick
  7. Lift Heavy
    bLacKjAck.'s Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  241 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,949
    Rep Power
    2082

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Arnold View Post
    what does this product do for you
    *Increased myotrophic activity

    *Favorable nutrient repartitioning

    *HPTA modulation

    *Estrogen management

    *Significant Pro-Hypertrophic capacity

    *Anti-Catabolic




    No seriously, I will say when I used it I stacked it with Bad Ass Mass, so I probably can't decipher the difference in the two as far as feeling. But on the stack I gained a lean 5lb which I was very happy with. Felt a lot of aggressive-ness and strength which would be due in part to the estro-control abilities.
  8. Elite Member
    jmh80's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,110
    Rep Power
    9661

    Reputation

    B - those scientists aren't good with people.
    You gotta give 'em a break - they don't get out of the lab all that often to deal with people, rather than just numbers.

    I should know.
  9. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by B5150 View Post
    Hi Patrick,

    I completely understand what you are getting at.

    Would you not agree with me that the following verbage:
    "very evasive, secretive"
    "obviously are not concerned about FDA labelling laws"
    "disservice to consumers"
    "just to be sneaky"
    "does not understand steroid chemistry or they did not care"
    "cuz its senseless"

    is more accusational and antagonizing rather than inquisitive or curious?

    You go on to say:
    "IF YOU NEED HELP WITH CHEMICAL NOMENCLATURE FOR YOU LABELS THEN JUST ASK ME."

    Is it your desire to embrace or to allienate. You are a tremendous asset to the entire industry. Sometimes the approach is just so damned attacking and insinuating rather than inquisitive. I know it's your MO, but for goodness sake Patrick. Save our board the drama...again.

    Lets give the folks who make the product some time to explain themselves before the whole damn peanut gallery jumps in with their two cents.

    Please play nice. We really love having you here Patrick

    i am not gonna lie. i am not simply inquisitive or curious. I know exactly what ALRI is doing with their labelling approach. Other companies do it to. And I hate it. Its unfair to me as a competitor. I just cannot pretend to be objective in my posts as i am not. So it comes out and you find it annoying. I understand that

    I also have a pet peeve when my competitors completely f' up things chemically speaking. It makes me feel like i am a chemist competing with a bunch of others who are just "playing" chemist. How would a doctor feel competing against others that are just "playing" doctor.

    ----------------

    Anyway, concerning methylated aromatase inhibitors. i have said this before, making a 17alpha-methyl derivative of an aromatase inhibitor makes no sense.

    look at all the steroidal aromatse inhibitors on the market. They are all 17-keto compounds. This is for a reason. 17-keto steroids all have a higher affinity for the aromatase enzyme than 17beta-hydroxyl compounds (this is totally opposite than it is for the androgen receptor)

    when you make a 17alpha-methyl, 17beta-hydroxyl (as ALRI is doing there) you prevent the formation of a 17-ketone derivative. You force the compound to stay a 17beta-hydroxyl. This makes no sense. you WANT the compound to be a 17-ketone and they are forcing it to stay as a much weaker 17beta-hydroxyl

    It appears to me that ALRI is approaching aromatase inhbitors as if they were androgens. They apparently are not aware that what they did here was completely counterproductive
  10. Board Moderator
    Unbreakable
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,709
    Rep Power
    986895

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Arnold View Post
    i am not gonna lie. i am not simply inquisitive or curious. I know exactly what ALRI is doing with their labelling approach. Other companies do it to. And I hate it. Its unfair to me as a competitor. I just cannot pretend to be objective in my posts as i am not. So it comes out and you find it annoying. I understand that
    Actually it is not annoying really. I just flinch a bit knowing what is to come from this. You and I are fine. I completely understand.
  11. New Member
    r6samson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    27
    Posts
    69
    Rep Power
    153

    Reputation

    THE Patrick Arnold? Holy cow, haha...you sir helped me on my way to college major and God-willing future career. Absolutely love your work and to be honest I'm kind of awe struck. Rather meet you then any other athlete in the world. Excellent organic chemist (correct?).


    The fact with the ketone at the end though IIRC it's a carbon doubled bonded to an oxygen so would that suffice or it needs to be an aldehyde at the end of the chain? Forgive my horrible attempts to understand. I'm trying to learn.


    EDIT: Disregard my 2nd paragraph. I think I see what you're saying now with the hydroxyl group at the end (aldehyde).

    JP
  12. New Member
    Erik2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    158

    Reputation

    Requesting resources


    Thanks for the post! I find these type of posts extremely valuable! However, as a non-chemist, I had a hard time following some of the details...

    What resources can you suggest, eg textbooks, etc., that can help us, non chemists, utilize to better understand your post and what this all means? I have actually been very interested in trying to decipher the chemical nomenclatures of the various products, understand what they actually do, and be able to learn this on my own.

    Any guidance is appreciated.

    Thanks for the post.
  13. Advanced Member
    whitedevil74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    554
    Rep Power
    376

    Reputation

    Thanks PA.
  14. Board Sponsor
    Sir Savage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Age
    33
    Posts
    2,084
    Rep Power
    1187

    Reputation

    Nice one, Pat. Did you post this at M & M, too? If not, the readers there need to see it, too.
  15. Lift Heavy
    bLacKjAck.'s Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  241 lbs.
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    3,949
    Rep Power
    2082

    Reputation

    me= working on getting some ALRI folk in here to make this thing fun....
  16. Elite Member
    jmh80's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,110
    Rep Power
    9661

    Reputation

    For what it's worth - I like JW. It's a good supp.
  17. Elite Member
    jmh80's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,110
    Rep Power
    9661

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik2003 View Post
    Thanks for the post! I find these type of posts extremely valuable! However, as a non-chemist, I had a hard time following some of the details...

    What resources can you suggest, eg textbooks, etc., that can help us, non chemists, utilize to better understand your post and what this all means? I have actually been very interested in trying to decipher the chemical nomenclatures of the various products, understand what they actually do, and be able to learn this on my own.

    Any guidance is appreciated.

    Thanks for the post.
    Not sure if they make a chemistry for dummies - but that might be a cheap start.

    I bet you could find some lectures at different colleges on line as to nomenclature in organic chemistry classes. It's one of the first things covered in Organic 1.
  18. O.G. Appnut
    Vitruvian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,203
    Rep Power
    85508

    Reputation Reputation

    If everything PA says is accurate, which no one seems to challenge..... then I hope plenty of people see this and stop to do some thinking for a minute. By this I am not saying to question ALRI.... I am saying don't jump on the bandwagon and ingest the next hyped product just cause everyone else said so. This kind of sh%t scares me to death..... in this case, it was fairly innocent.... but someone is going to pull this with a dangerous compound sooner or later, and all the people who followed like sheep are going to be left paying the price.

    If you can't research an ingredient ON YOUR OWN, you shouldn't even touch the darn product.

    Thank you for what I hope will be an eye opener PA.

    (Steps from soapbox.... trips, falls.....)
    Applied Nutriceuticals Representative
    Better Results Through Science
    Success occurs when everything you have is APPLIED.
    Have you heard about N.O. Uptake? ;-)
  19. Board Sponsor
    rpen22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,702
    Rep Power
    11092

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanbane View Post
    If everything PA says is accurate, which no one seems to challenge..... then I hope plenty of people see this and stop to do some thinking for a minute. By this I am not saying to question ALRI.... I am saying don't jump on the bandwagon and ingest the next hyped product just cause everyone else said so. This kind of sh%t scares me to death..... in this case, it was fairly innocent.... but someone is going to pull this with a dangerous compound sooner or later, and all the people who followed like sheep are going to be left paying the price.

    If you can't research an ingredient ON YOUR OWN, you shouldn't even touch the darn product.

    Thank you for what I hope will be an eye opener PA.

    (Steps from soapbox.... trips, falls.....)



    And thanks for the chem lesson, Patrick! I enjoy reading about and trying to understand this type of thing, so it's much appreciated.
  20. New Member
    r6samson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Age
    27
    Posts
    69
    Rep Power
    153

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jmh80 View Post
    Not sure if they make a chemistry for dummies - but that might be a cheap start.

    I bet you could find some lectures at different colleges on line as to nomenclature in organic chemistry classes. It's one of the first things covered in Organic 1.


    *Organic Chemistry I for DUMMIES sits to my right on the desk*


    I have to take OChem next year and Dad picked this up for me to get a head start. Pretty good if you ask me, but as far as reading and deciefiering steroids I don't know if I'd recommend it. Organic = Carbon so alot of the material coverd (thus far what I've covered) doesn't include the andro's, dione's, diol's, and all but rather you're typical functional groups cluster into carbon chains.


    JP
  21. Board Moderator
    Unbreakable
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,709
    Rep Power
    986895

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanbane View Post
    If everything PA says is accurate, which no one seems to challenge..... then I hope plenty of people see this and stop to do some thinking for a minute. By this I am not saying to question ALRI.... I am saying don't jump on the bandwagon and ingest the next hyped product just cause everyone else said so. This kind of sh%t scares me to death..... in this case, it was fairly innocent.... but someone is going to pull this with a dangerous compound sooner or later, and all the people who followed like sheep are going to be left paying the price.

    If you can't research an ingredient ON YOUR OWN, you shouldn't even touch the darn product.

    Thank you for what I hope will be an eye opener PA.

    (Steps from soapbox.... trips, falls.....)
    The only ones that need step up to the challenge at this point is ALRI. PA's challenge is directed at ALRI and can be disputed by them. They need be given the benefit of the doubt at this point. Whatever PA has deciphered from the label does not even mean that that is truly what is in it (remember that one).

    Don't be too naive to believe that many have not already ingested harmful drugs from any of the plethora of supplements that are being ingested by members here at AM or any board for that matter.

    Lets be civil.
  22. New Member
    Erik2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    158

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanbane View Post

    If you can't research an ingredient ON YOUR OWN, you shouldn't even touch the darn product.
    I agree with what you are saying but I'd be careful on saying something like the above. It goes too far. I keeps people from coming to these type of websites, trying to join this type of community, and asking questions.

    There is a difference with people trying to research 6-oxo, 7-oxo, and 11-oxo versus people trying to break down something like: 17alpha-methyl-1,4,6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one.

    Also most of the people using these, and other compounds can understand what methylating a compound does to it and why it is necessary. But I am willing to bet the majority of people do not understand what something like: "6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one" is.

    Personally, I may be mispeaking, as I am not interested in where carbon atoms are and what ring they orbit from, but I would like to learn more about "6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one" and what type of chemicals such nomenclatures are and how this may differ from one product to another.

    Please understand I am not trying to fight, but I did not want the question to be blown off...
  23. Board Moderator
    Unbreakable
    David Dunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,709
    Rep Power
    986895

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jmh80 View Post
    B - those scientists aren't good with people.
    You gotta give 'em a break - they don't get out of the lab all that often to deal with people, rather than just numbers.
    Oh, yeah, and I'm good with people? He's a big boy, he'll be OK.
    I should know.
    This explains A LOT.
  24. O.G. Appnut
    Vitruvian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,203
    Rep Power
    85508

    Reputation Reputation

    [QUOTE=Erik2003;852344]
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanbane View Post

    If you can't research an ingredient ON YOUR OWN, you shouldn't even touch the darn product.
    QUOTE]

    I agree with what you are saying but I'd be careful on saying something like the above. It goes too far. I keeps people from coming to these type of websites, trying to join this type of community, and asking questions.

    There is a difference with people trying to research 6-oxo, 7-oxo, and 11-oxo versus people trying to break down something like: 17alpha-methyl-1,4,6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one.

    Also most of the people using these, and other compounds can understand what methylating a compound does to it and why it is necessary. But I am willing to bet the majority of people do not understand what something like: "6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one" is.

    Personally, I may be mispeaking, as I am not interested in where carbon atoms are and what ring they orbit from, but I would like to learn more about "6-androstatrien-17beta-ol-3-one" and what type of chemicals such nomenclatures are and how this may differ from one product to another.

    Please understand I am not trying to fight, but I did not want the question to be blown off...

    I understand what you are saying here... but comments like mine are not what will keep people away from the lifestyle and industry.... it's the potential negative side effects that will surface one day that will have a much greater impact. What I stated is a simple, sad but true fact: We need to be careful. I am directing this at people who see a new product, start a thread asking what the 17 methyl ethyl killya diol is, get an answer like "my buddy put on 30 lbs of muscle in 1 month... and he didn't even need PCT" and order it up. I am not saying you need to be able to fully recognize a compound on your own, but you need to go a little further than asking strangers on a forum.


    Summary: Ask questions. Get answers from others. Make your own, informed decisions.
    If a company won't discuss what something is..... there's a reason they don't want you to know. You gamble on what that reason is yourself.
    Applied Nutriceuticals Representative
    Better Results Through Science
    Success occurs when everything you have is APPLIED.
    Have you heard about N.O. Uptake? ;-)
  25. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by B5150 View Post
    Actually it is not annoying really. I just flinch a bit knowing what is to come from this. You and I are fine. I completely understand.

    i met author and he is a nice guy. he is not an egotistical prick like alot of the others.

    i read his product labels and stuff though and it pushes my buttons. it really goes deep with me. alot of it has to do with the fact that alri, and similar companies sell all these synthetic steroid analogs left and right. consumers are awed by it and think to themselves that they are the vanguards of the supplement industry - the smartest and most innovative out there (and i am a hasbeen cuz i don't have a new steroidal product every 3 months). and that hurts my pride

    these folks don't really understand that i can not, and will not play on that field. I cannot because i am the one that will get arrested if i sell this stuff cuz of who i am. I will not because i want a legitimate future for my company and that is not consistent with grey market designer steroidals.

    but on top of that, i see some of the stuff that comes out and it is so frustrating because if i COULD play that game i would introduce stuff so much better. it drives me nuts!!

    well anyway, i guess if i did not have my company and was younger and starting out i might join the designer game. i understand that. i don't fault these people for doing it. maybe my only wish is that people would understand my perception and position in the whole matter
  26. O.G. Appnut
    Vitruvian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,203
    Rep Power
    85508

    Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by B5150 View Post
    The only ones that need step up to the challenge at this point is ALRI. PA's challenge is directed at ALRI and can be disputed by them. They need be given the benefit of the doubt at this point. Whatever PA has deciphered from the label does not even mean that that is truly what is in it (remember that one).

    Don't be too naive to believe that many have not already ingested harmful drugs from any of the plethora of supplements that are being ingested by members here at AM or any board for that matter.

    Lets be civil.
    Agreed B5150.

    I am definitely not stating anything negative towards ALRI at all. I use, enjoy, and trust a couple ALRI products myself. Simply riding the coattails of a point that this situation MAY illustrate quite well.
    There are other instances that highlight the point better (think any case where an ingredient is questioned, and mysteriously.... the company never responds or responds with lies).
    Applied Nutriceuticals Representative
    Better Results Through Science
    Success occurs when everything you have is APPLIED.
    Have you heard about N.O. Uptake? ;-)
  27. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by r6samson View Post
    THE Patrick Arnold? Holy cow, haha...you sir helped me on my way to college major and God-willing future career. Absolutely love your work and to be honest I'm kind of awe struck. Rather meet you then any other athlete in the world. Excellent organic chemist (correct?).


    The fact with the ketone at the end though IIRC it's a carbon doubled bonded to an oxygen so would that suffice or it needs to be an aldehyde at the end of the chain? Forgive my horrible attempts to understand. I'm trying to learn.


    EDIT: Disregard my 2nd paragraph. I think I see what you're saying now with the hydroxyl group at the end (aldehyde).

    JP

    an aldehyde is hc=o. you cannot have a aldehyde at C17. that is because it is because it is "secondary" (bound to a carbon that already has two bonds). to have an aldehyde that carbon would need room for another hydrogen to bond to (make sense?)

    you seem like you are just learning organic. it will all come to you in time. its like a new language - just takes alot of practice before it becomes second nature
  28. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik2003 View Post
    Thanks for the post! I find these type of posts extremely valuable! However, as a non-chemist, I had a hard time following some of the details...

    What resources can you suggest, eg textbooks, etc., that can help us, non chemists, utilize to better understand your post and what this all means? I have actually been very interested in trying to decipher the chemical nomenclatures of the various products, understand what they actually do, and be able to learn this on my own.

    Any guidance is appreciated.

    Thanks for the post.
    unless you are some unique super genius (or someone with infinite patience and discipline) you are never going to self teach yourself organic chemistry. you need to go to school for years to pick it up
  29. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by bLacKjAck. View Post
    me= working on getting some ALRI folk in here to make this thing fun....
    come on, lets not make this another fight.
  30. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by jmh80 View Post
    For what it's worth - I like JW. It's a good supp.
    if you like it then thats all that matters

    my opinions on it were valid and valuable, but i did not say the product had to suck

    but there may be better choices out there, like regular ATD

    or perhaps even alri lucked out and despite the fact that established science says the methylated ATD should be inferior to straight ATD, it actually is better for some reason
  31. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanbane View Post
    If everything PA says is accurate, which no one seems to challenge..... then I hope plenty of people see this and stop to do some thinking for a minute. By this I am not saying to question ALRI.... I am saying don't jump on the bandwagon and ingest the next hyped product just cause everyone else said so.
    if there is a general point to be taken home here, then this is it
  32. New Member
    Erik2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    158

    Reputation

    [QUOTE=Lanbane;852354]I totally agree with your point. And I do admit, that I was paranoid in thinking the comment was aimed at my question. Sorry.

    One thing to note, and it is kind of funny. In reading the book Legal Muscle, one resource stated that the medical community has acknowledged that they have lost the edge in knowledge about AASs'. The resource stated that the formost experts may actualle be the users (of AAS).

    Based on my very limited experience (and no organic chemistry) much of my research is unfortunately the forums, and decifering alot of what is said, argued and people's results.

    I am still trying to find out how to decifer what some products are, eg Mass FX, JW, etc. I used the Mass FX line (after research), was careful and really found it to be beneficial. Now I want to try ALRI's products. I think there may not be alot of info out there because these forums and these products may be the cutting edge of non steroid supplementation.

    Well, right now I have to thank MST in providing me the opportunity to test their products.
  33. Featured Author
    Patrick Arnold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    4,119
    Rep Power
    554324

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by B5150 View Post
    The only ones that need step up to the challenge at this point is ALRI. PA's challenge is directed at ALRI and can be disputed by them. They need be given the benefit of the doubt at this point. Whatever PA has deciphered from the label does not even mean that that is truly what is in it (remember that one).
    l.
    yeah i thought about that.

    i am very confident that what this contains is 17alpha-methylATD

    if an alri rep comes on here and confirms it then fine

    if an alri rep comes on here and tells everyone that it is a different compound, and specifically says what that compound is, then fine

    but if a rep comes on here and denies it is methylATD, yet refuses to state what the real compound is, then everyone here should be upset. you have the right to know what you are taking
  34. Banned
    rockhard_4eva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Age
    33
    Posts
    154
    Rep Power
    0

    Reputation

    Thanks for the info Patrick.
  35. New Member
    BLACK747's Avatar
    Stats
    5'7"  231 lbs.
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    470
    Rep Power
    341

    Reputation

    interesting
  36. New Member
    Erik2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    129
    Rep Power
    158

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Arnold View Post
    unless you are some unique super genius (or someone with infinite patience and discipline) you are never going to self teach yourself organic chemistry. you need to go to school for years to pick it up
    Just searching for something to read to help understand some of the products.

    I researched the Anabolics 2007 book, and it was getting bad reviews. Thought some of you knew of a good book on the subject.
  37. O.G. Appnut
    Vitruvian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    5,203
    Rep Power
    85508

    Reputation Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Arnold View Post
    yeah i thought about that.

    i am very confident that what this contains is 17alpha-methylATD

    if an alri rep comes on here and confirms it then fine

    if an alri rep comes on here and tells everyone that it is a different compound, and specifically says what that compound is, then fine

    but if a rep comes on here and denies it is methylATD, yet refuses to state what the real compound is, then everyone here should be upset. you have the right to know what you are taking
    Clear and to the point... the way we like it.

    Sidenote: On another thread, maybe even another forum, I remember reading questions about a companies ingredients, with methyl ATD at the heart of the controversy. Was it JW, or another product and/or company altogether? Anyone else read this? I'm wondering if answers were given there............
    Applied Nutriceuticals Representative
    Better Results Through Science
    Success occurs when everything you have is APPLIED.
    Have you heard about N.O. Uptake? ;-)
  38. New Member
    tgass's Avatar
    Stats
    6'2"  185 lbs.
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Age
    31
    Posts
    161
    Rep Power
    216

    Reputation

    Quote Originally Posted by Lanbane View Post
    Clear and to the point... the way we like it.

    Sidenote: On another thread, maybe even another forum, I remember reading questions about a companies ingredients, with methyl ATD at the heart of the controversy. Was it JW, or another product and/or company altogether? Anyone else read this? I'm wondering if answers were given there............
    Yes i remember that, it was a huge threat on BB.com, and after a while nothing was concluded as the threat just got deleted "mysteriously"...
  39. Elite Member
    jmh80's Avatar
    Stats
    5'10"  180 lbs.
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,110
    Rep Power
    9661

    Reputation

    It was confirmed as methyl ATD (from my feeble recollection).

    Yes - JW ignited controversy over the possibility of increasing liver values (AST/ALT). ALRI decided to have folks get blood work taken.

    I'm taking part - in a month or so (when I finish MassFX and Hyperdrol).
  40. Elite Member
    stxnas's Avatar
    Stats
    5'8"  195 lbs.
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Age
    33
    Posts
    9,977
    Rep Power
    969164

    Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation Reputation

    Correct me if I'm wrong (which I might be), but I thought that was ADED...from what I understand, ADED is a metabolite of ATD...although I have only seen this mentioned in conjunction with ALRI products.

    EDIT: Oh ****, sorry...I thought there was only one page to the thread and just realized there are two...sorry if I just repeated something already said.
    RcB Since 09-06-2011 20:55 EST, Post 49
  

  
 

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-18-2009, 02:55 AM
  2. The Efffects of Jungle Warfare & Pro-Anabol on Riseboi
    By riseboi in forum Supplement Logs
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 07-06-2007, 01:45 PM
  3. Possible adverse side effects of Jungle Warfare...
    By storm88 in forum Supplements
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-09-2006, 08:19 AM
  4. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-08-2006, 11:31 PM
  5. An Analysis of the Relative Safety of Ephedra
    By Sheesh in forum Supplements
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-05-2003, 05:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Log in
Log in